Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Why did the Japanese love bayonets so much?

Discussion in 'Small Arms and Edged Weapons' started by Zefer, Sep 2, 2009.

  1. Smithson

    Smithson Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    5
    The japanese believed that the way to die was bye tranditional ways and by you own actions not the actions of you gun
     
  2. Smithson

    Smithson Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    5
    im sorry for the terrible spelling my keyboards broke
     
  3. Chesehead121

    Chesehead121 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    2
    That attack on the tank must have scared the bjesus out of the rest of the crew when they found out...:eek: And imagine if he didn't go all:eek:tto_pistolfire:....
     
  4. Chesehead121

    Chesehead121 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    2
    Maybe the USMC planes had bayonet lugs XD! although I actually did hear on a show called "Dogfights"(anyone heard of it) that a Zero rammed a Dauntless or some plane... can't remember. Well... as you may have expected, the Dauntless won, and the Zero went down in flames with part of its wing torn off. The Dauntless returned to base, that was its 3rd kill of the day. So I guess the Dauntless was actually dauntless.... (Dauntless::muscleman: Zero::mad:)
     
  5. surfersami

    surfersami Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    33
    It all boils down to having sharp, shiney pointy things on the end of a weapon for close combat. The Japonese used a charging type battle plan a lot of the time. A spear would have been as or more effective, with bayonette attached the standard rifle was a long weapon. I think given the right circumstances, a Zulu short spear would be more effective if properly used. On the other hand, early in the island hopping campains a good machine gun placement really depleated and decimated the bonzai charges. Maybe some of the VETS who faced one could chime in and shed some light here.
     
  6. Triple C

    Triple C Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,599
    Likes Received:
    230
    Try WW2F's veteran subforum. SW Pacific Vet said that in his experience, the Japanese bonzai charge was foolish and they never had a chance against a well-placed 50 cal. HMG. Slaughtered like sheep was his expression.

    Strange that they never figured that out from European experience during WWI.
     
  7. froek

    froek Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    You think they are doing a banzai attack against a .50??
    You use banzai attacks were they won't expect it and not at a place where a grenade is much better...
     
  8. Hanz Gooblemienhoffen

    Hanz Gooblemienhoffen Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2009
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    3
    To be honest there is more to the Japanese favour of bayonet tactics.

    One could compare it to the American belief in Tank Destroyer tactics. Americans believed the tank shouldnt fight other thanks but that tanks should be engaged by specialized TD's..whether you believe this was good or not it was the belief at the time.

    So too did Japan believe that the bayonet would be the dominate weapon of the Pacific campaign. Now before you go and dismiss this idea as "foolhardy" take a look at the Japanese situation. Fighting in Asia (esp. china) meant that Arm. tactics and major engagements like those in Europe between highly industrialized nations would not happen.

    Japanese tactics and weapons like the Nambu and Knee mortar were designed with the idea that infantry would always be the primary weapon of the ground war.

    Neither would there be a tremendous amount of HMG's and other fast firing weapons. The LMG, Artillery and major infantry engagements would be the norm. In that case the bayonet would be more than decisive.

    Japanese soldiers also typically had more bayonet training than a NA or Euro would ever have thought possible. in fact Japanese infantry spent more time perfecting close combat and long marchs than any other subjects.

    To a large degree these tactics bore fruit. Japanese troops, unlike many Allied ones also knew that, because they were a "foot" army, they were often short of supplies, both they and their supplies often followed on foot...so ammunition was not always in such great supply that they could be "generous" with its use.

    While bushido plays a role its even deeper than that. Japanses infantry tried to cultivate "hara" (roughly translated to "guts"). In this way it was not an accident that Japanese troops seemed "fearless" in charging Allied positions. It was not an accident, it was intentional that Japanese troops tried to get into close combat as this is where thier strength really lay. Japanese troops endured incredibly physically demanding training that would be considered excessive to all but the most highly trained "commandos" of Western armies..all in the hopes of building "hara".

    It was only as Japanese troops came up against better armed US and British troops that were armed with a proliferation of MG's of both a heavy and light caliber that the failure of these tactics really was "illuminated".

    It seems foolish, and no doubt there was a real lack of imagination in charging a .50, but these tactics had proved successful earlier in the war and if left with few options it certainly offered a death that would be "grand".

    I dont want to give the impression that the Japanese military did not realise or understand that they were at a disadvantage to better armed Western powers. They certainley were aware..but again appreciate thier position: they were an industrial nation but not with unlimited resources.

    They realized that to fight Western powers the single most paramount need was a strong Navy and Air Force and think they succeeding in that. But this meant that things like tanks and the like were not possible and in many cases not fit for combat in the PTO.

    Thus they relied on infantry on the ground ( as the resource of men they did have) and the most important weapon that resource has was the bayonet.
     
    Totenkopf likes this.
  9. Karma

    Karma Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2009
    Messages:
    517
    Likes Received:
    93
    I wholeheartedly agree. Very well thought out.

    Indeed the Japanese emphasized their land doctrine on infantry units, and without the support of heavy armor or a promised supply line, Japanese soldiers were often taught to endure hunger, thirst and pain to live off the land whenever possible to provide a self-sustaining army. Therefore rations of Japanese forces seem definitely meager in proportions compared to Western rations.

    Training was also taken from a hard approach. My grandmother lived near the 7th District Army Headquarters in Hokkaido and often witnessed the training of soldiers herself. She once saw a drill sergeant bring out a langstroth beehive in front of the soldiers at attention and let loose all the bees. And throughout the whole session, the soldiers were not to move a single muscle as the bees swarmed around and stung them. Those that failed knew that even more pain would follow afterwards. I don't think testing the pain threshold was the norm in most IJA training but it certainly wasn't taken as unusual. After all, this was an organization that permitted officers to physically strike those of a lower rank.

    Bayonets were an integral part of a IJA soldier's training, to the point where even a martial art was formed, called Jūkendō. In the Russo-Japanese War, to make up for the difference in height of the Russians and the Japanese, the latter had to improve their skill in close quarter combat. And as everyone knows, combat prior to the Pacific War meant that whatever the Japanese were going against were deemed "inferior" in terms of firepower and combat skill. This they learned the hard way in the Pacific where they were cut down before they could use their bayonets effectively. Soldiers back then were called 肉弾 nikudan. Literally translated to "human bullet". Because they didn't have any bullets to shoot, all they had left was to charge the enemy for one last effort.
     
  10. Mehar

    Mehar Ace

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    1,366
    Likes Received:
    115
    Correct me if I'm wrong but in most cases were Banzai charges not done when ammo, supplies, etc were low or depleted?

    Really depends on how many people are running th charge and if they "bottleneck" to be cut down like that.
     
  11. Hanz Gooblemienhoffen

    Hanz Gooblemienhoffen Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2009
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    3
    Actually bayonet charges were not only used when out of ammo, but certainly this was a factor.

    I recall in the book: Tales by Japanese Soldiers of a number of occasions..esp at night where Japanese infantry were told to empty their rifles!!! in preparation for night charge.

    While this seems counter intuitive (and honestly i think its silly), but the idea was that no one would accidently or through fear fire a round early and alert the Brit forces of the eminent attack.

    This was another technique used by Japanese inf to negate Allied superior firepower. Night bayonet attacks were in a strange way a good technique..when it worked..as trying to rush MG positions in the daytime wouldn't work.

    There is much made of "Japanese suicide" attacks..but only in a few occasions were they truly intended to end the lives of the Japanese...the idea was to kill the enemy..even if the idea was technically flawed cause the enemy had many MG's. Really only on the island campaigns where it was clear there was no escape, no retreat and no hope for re-enforcement do you see what can fairly be called a "mass suicide by mg".

    Its interesting though how we characterize the Japanese actions as "suicide" charges and when allied nations fight to the last man we think of it as a "heroic" last stand.

    To me its a little like the idea that all Russian troops were simply feed into the German MG's in solid waves of human fodder. While this happened it really wasn't the norm. Its also a lot like the idea that every Tiger simply drove up killed 10 Shermans and went home.

    What is amusing is how a few of these incidents have become so famous that we consider it the norm now.
     
  12. Triple C

    Triple C Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,599
    Likes Received:
    230
    That's what the veteran said. Hundreds of Japanese dead piled before their positions. Banzai charge was the standard response of sorts to default to when things went wrong for the Japanese. They believed in the bayonet, and they also believe in washing the shame of defeat away with your own blood.
     
  13. Triple C

    Triple C Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,599
    Likes Received:
    230
    Hanz,

    This is reasonable doubt but in case of the Japanse Imperial Army, everything you read about human wave assaults actually were true. So often did they use this tactic that the Japanese commander in Guadacanal had to forbid it by formal order, and deny his subordinate commander's request for permission to charge--time and time again!

    Massed human bayonet attacks was common on the Eastern Front for 1941 and thereafter occurred as relapses of a bad habit. The Japanese never realized that it was a bad habbit and kept on doing it til the very end.
     
  14. Hanz Gooblemienhoffen

    Hanz Gooblemienhoffen Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2009
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    3
    Sorry Triple,

    I tried to say that "they did occur"...however they really aren't the norm for the Japanese Campaign from the start. As I say in my post its really only on the island campaigns that you see these types of "suicide" charges. They occur in other theatres; such as in Burma campaign..but here they are a technique to overcome Allied superior firepower rather than to commit mass suicide.

    As well on the Russian front im trying to make the point that not every battle/engagement involves Russians simply throwing their lives away, as human fodder. Again I freely admit it happens..but it leaves many the impression that Russian and Japanese soldiers are simply fodder that each and every time only rush MG's...this simply isn't true.

    No more than to say that no Sherman ever got the better of a Tiger. This too is not true...though the impression persists and takes on a "its been said 100 times so its true and happens every time".

    This simply isnt true.
     
  15. Triple C

    Triple C Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,599
    Likes Received:
    230
    In the case of the Russians, I agree. However, for IJA, massed bayonet charges remained to be a regular part of their tactical repertoire. Banzai charges were incessant, especially if the Japanese find the situation deteriorating. Numerous attacks recorded during Guadalcanal, Buna-Gona, Iwo, Okinawa, etc.
     
  16. Triple C

    Triple C Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,599
    Likes Received:
    230
    08: 314th HQ Intelligence Team

    Story told by a Japanese American soldier caught in the Okinawa battle. Note the prevalence of banzai attacks and the lateness of this battle in chronology.

     
  17. surfersami

    surfersami Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    33
    Thank you Karma for your insite into this. I was always fascinated with the Japanese ability to motivate themselves to the point of this type of attack. I think in the war on the Asian mainland these attacks were probably very effective and quite terrifying.
    I often wonder to the mindset of being superior to those you are fighting against, close combat would be the ultimate proof of concept.
     
  18. Kobalt04

    Kobalt04 Dishonorably Discharged

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2009
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    1
    Because they were such lousy shots with all types of firearms.
     
  19. STURMTRUPPEN

    STURMTRUPPEN Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    611
    Likes Received:
    4
    they loved bayonets cause of the quick kill they inflicted
     
  20. Sentinel

    Sentinel Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    47
    Really? I think the many sailors killed by superb Japanese naval gunnery might have a different opinion.
     
    Totenkopf, Karma and A-58 like this.

Share This Page