Posted 15 January 2011 - 09:16 PM
Posted 15 January 2011 - 09:46 PM
As much as I dislike the idea, I wouldn't be surprised if the Seahawks show up better than people expect them to. Don't ask me why, might be because so many pundits made such a big deal of how they got in the playoffs and whether they deserved to be there. Might give them the "underdog" attitude that is an intangible but sometimes awesome advantage when the game is played.
The Jets have two chances in Foxboro, slim and none. If the Pats loose at home to the Jets, I will be speechless.
Edited by brndirt1, 15 January 2011 - 11:17 PM.
Posted 16 January 2011 - 01:00 AM
Posted 16 January 2011 - 05:02 AM
Wars are rarely fought in black and white, but in infinite shades of grey
(Poppy is occasionaly correct, or so I hear)
Posted 16 January 2011 - 05:22 PM
I expect Chicago to win, but they have lost to Seattle this year. They are both different teams at this meeting though, but stranger things have happened. If they take the 'hawks for granted, they could be rudely surprised.
Posted 16 January 2011 - 10:09 PM
Posted 16 January 2011 - 10:21 PM
Posted 17 January 2011 - 03:29 PM
Posted 17 January 2011 - 06:59 PM
Posted 17 January 2011 - 07:45 PM
Anybody know if the Lions won? Oh wait...
Not to get too far off subject, but I think the Lions are on the rebound and if they weren't in such a "tough" division they could be even better. But hey, the Vikings are going to be in their place next year I think, bottom of the heap. They don't have a "francise QB" in the mix to go with the rest of their talent like the Lions, Bears, and Packers do.
Posted 17 January 2011 - 09:38 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users