Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Russian Fighter Buzzes US Ship

Discussion in 'Military History' started by Poppy, Apr 14, 2014.

  1. Poppy

    Poppy grasshopper

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    7,740
    Likes Received:
    820
  2. USMCPrice

    USMCPrice Idiot at Large

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    5,168
    Likes Received:
    2,140
    Location:
    God's Country
    It doesn't matter. It was all just symbolic anyway. The US sent the ship as a symbolic measure, though the US spokesperson appears to be speaking out of both sides of their mouth when they describe it's presence;

    "The USS Donald Cook has been conducting routine operations in international waters east of Romania."

    and

    "said the deployment is part of an effort to reassure allies and partners in the region."

    The administration is trying to intimidate Putin into complying with the demands of the US and other western powers. Putin is thumbing his nose at the US because he knows the US has declawed it's military the last several years. Nothing more than that, two spoiled children showing off their toys.
     
  3. rkline56

    rkline56 USS Oklahoma City CG5

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Messages:
    1,194
    Likes Received:
    215
    Location:
    CA Norte Mexico, USA
    Anyone think this gets patched up before the G-8 meeting? Or will it be the Magnificent Seven (always a good choice)?
     
  4. green slime

    green slime Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,150
    Likes Received:
    584
    "The frigate is likely to replace the USS Donald Cook." So this is part of a drawdown already? Ah, to be a politician....

    Isn't it more likely to be a Su-24MR (Fencer-E: Dedicated tactical reconnaissance variant) or Su-24MP (Fencer-F: Dedicated electronic signals intelligence)? Buzzing a USN Destroyer then makes sense.

    The 43rd Independent Naval Shturmovik (Assault) Air Squadron - HQ at Gvardeyskoye, Crimea - has 18x Su-24M, and 4x Su-24MR.
     
  5. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    20,829
    Likes Received:
    3,054
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    But it wouldn't need to get anywhere near a ship to pick up sigsint, never mind make 12 passes.
     
  6. green slime

    green slime Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,150
    Likes Received:
    584
    That depends on what they were hoping to provoke with the flybys, and what the other aircraft was loitering in the area. If the flyby's were photographic reconn (Su-24MR), and the distant loiterer sigint (Su-24MP)?

    There were only 10 sigint Su-24MPs produced. Where they are stationed ordinarily I have no clue.
     
  7. PzJgr

    PzJgr Drill Instructor

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2000
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    890
    Location:
    Jefferson, OH
    Nothing new. When I served on board the USNS Observation Island, we got buzzed every time we got close to station off the Kamchatka Peninsula. We also got shadowed by some ship for a while.
     
  8. Poppy

    Poppy grasshopper

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    7,740
    Likes Received:
    820
  9. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    9,567
    Likes Received:
    3,072
    10 Bum salute...
     
  10. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    20,829
    Likes Received:
    3,054
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    Be tempted myself...
     

Share This Page