Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Thoughts On Erwin Rommel

Discussion in 'WWII General' started by Smiley 2.0, Dec 2, 2014.

  1. Smiley 2.0

    Smiley 2.0 Smiles

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2014
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    180
    Location:
    The Land of the Noble Steed
    I recently bought a book called The History Buff's Guide to World War II by Thomas R. Flagel. Its kind of a general book that gives top ten rankings of different things in World War Two such as best generals, important battles, etc. Its kind of general but it has a lot of interesting facts. One particular list caught my eye. It was titled Top Ten Worst Military Commanders. It gave commanders that deserved to be put there such as Hermann Goering, Toyada Soemu, etc. But what shocked me was that at #7 was Erwin Rommel. I will put some info below.


    The author describes him as someone who frequently disobeyed orders, whose "maverick, reckless exploits were lethally out of place." It also says that he displayed "a contempt if not ignorance of logistics," and refused to cooperate with other officers. The author also implies that the only reason why he was victorious in most cases was because he only faced inexperienced troops, and how he left his men in Africa to escape to the more quieter western theater where he "wasted time and resources on the tactically futile Atlantic Wall," and that he "augmented," his already "inflated status." He basically criticizes Rommel for everything that he had done. I personally believe that Rommel was a genius and brilliant tactitian and general but he had some flaws. But the author seemed to go all Open Season on everything wrong with Rommel.
     
  2. Diesera

    Diesera New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2014
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well his hot temper is an problem . Even insult a general
     
  3. belasar

    belasar Court Jester

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    8,515
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Funny, I have read many book on military commanders throughout history and a common theme for the most famous, and those with victories under their belt is many of the same flaws quoted. Temper, a tendency to interpret their orders, to act independently of colleagues seem all too commonplace in the great captain's of history.

    He who dares, wins.
     
  4. Smiley 2.0

    Smiley 2.0 Smiles

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2014
    Messages:
    1,450
    Likes Received:
    180
    Location:
    The Land of the Noble Steed
    That is a new information for me regarding his temper. I never knew that Rommel had a temper.
     
  5. belasar

    belasar Court Jester

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    8,515
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Almost every high ranking commander of any note has some reputation for tempers. Often they are for show as much for actual anger. Most commanders realize that the margin for victory can be very small or dependent on acting in a narrow window of time.
     
  6. bronk7

    bronk7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2013
    Messages:
    4,753
    Likes Received:
    328
    Location:
    MIDWEST
    he got very far in NAfrica.....I'd say that was very good
     
  7. mac_bolan00

    mac_bolan00 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    20
    if you were rumored to have been romantically linked with coco chanel, you couldn't have been all grumpy and obnoxious.
     
  8. harolds

    harolds Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,898
    Likes Received:
    372
    Oh, when was this mac_bolan00? I knew Rommel fathered an illegitimate child before he married Luci but never heard about this. Please elucidate!
     
  9. Tamino

    Tamino Doc - The Deplorable

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    305
    Location:
    Untersteiermark
    His "victories" weren't lasting and the Führer pulled him from Africa to save reputation of his favorite propaganda general from a catastrophic defeat. Without the Führer's intervention, Rommel could have been "Paulus" of North Africa.



    Myths are just fine but have nothing in common with the reality.
     
  10. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,461
    Likes Received:
    2,207
    This was discussed twice earlier I think. Here´s one of the threads:

    http://www.ww2f.com/topic/4809-rommel´s-second-family/
     
  11. Sheldrake

    Sheldrake Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,773
    Likes Received:
    568
    Location:
    London UK
    Thanks for the heads up. This is why I don't buy books entitled "the history buffs guide to..." Who is Thomas R Flagel? Is he a respected historian or a hack commentator offering superficial opinions in a populist style for Christmas? ?

    Thinking about it Maybe its the kind of book to leave around to raise the blood pressure of the less commercially successful historical authors. A copy or two left at the GAGm of the Beritish Commission for Military History might thin the ranks of the old and bold. ;)
     
  12. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,461
    Likes Received:
    2,207
    I think personally that often to make a book sell you have to have something "new" in the book. For instance a Finnish historian made a book on that we could have survived ourselves the massive Red Army summer attack of 1944. No, we did not need the Kuhlmey Stukas, the 5,000 Panzerfausts, their Stug´s or German 122nd infantry division... I do believe you, yes... ;) ;)
     

Share This Page