|
|  |
 |
Members: 5,156
Threads: 16,691
Posts: 207,112
Online: 125
Newest Member:
teejay |
|
|
| War in the Pacific The Sino-Japanese War, the attack at Pearl Harbor to the atomic bombing of Nagasaki |

March 24th, 2005, 01:59 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Greater Chicago Metropolitan Area
Posts: 724
|
|
|
Honestly I don't know why I was so shocked when I saw this article in the paper today. Pleasantly shocked, but shocked nonetheless.
Sculpture in China honors U.S. Flying Tigers of WWII
March 23, 2005
BEIJING -- China has erected a memorial to the Flying Tigers, a band of U.S. fighter pilots who defended China against Japan during World War II, the government said Tuesday.
The sculpture wall was erected in Kunming, capital of the southwestern province of Yunnan, where the Tigers maintained their planes, the official Xinhua News Agency said, citing memorial designer Yu Chuan.
Construction of the memorial was timed to mark the 60th anniversary of the end of World War II, Xinhua said. Local officials hope it can become a major tourist attraction.
The Tigers were a volunteer band of U.S. military men sent in secret to Asia by President Franklin D. Roosevelt before the United States entered World War II. They joined an air force organized for China by Claire Lee Chennault, a retired U.S. Army colonel.
The memorial, measuring 13 feet tall and 490 feet wide, features a sculpture of Chennault and scenes of the Tigers' victories and their cooperation with local Chinese, Xinhua said.
The Flying Tigers had fewer than 100 pilots and 55 planes. They flew for only nine months, until U.S. forces arrived in China in May 1942 and absorbed the unit.
The Tigers have become a potent symbol of Chinese-U.S. unity, and communist authorities readily overlook the fact that they fought for the leftists' bitter enemies -- the Nationalists who ruled China in the 1930s and '40s.
AP
__________________
Bill Murray
Why do we press harder on the remote control when we know the batteries are getting weak?
|

April 16th, 2005, 08:29 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,943
|
|
I just now noticed this post. It is surprising that they would put up a sculpture at this point in time. Most of them are probably dead by now.
Do you know of any books that give a "balanced" view of the Flying Tigers ? All the stuff I read on them make them out superheros but if they were so good why were they discontinued ? The PR on them is really good but is it true do you think ?
I know I would not want to take on a Zero or Oscar in a P-40. [img]graemlins/no.gif[/img]
__________________
Work Harder ! Millions on welfare are depending on you.
|

April 16th, 2005, 11:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Polska
Posts: 71
|
|
I believe that David Lee "Tex" Hill is still alive, he was in 2003.
I know that Witold Urbanowicz died years ago.
__________________
Co nam obca przemoc wziela,
Szabla odbierzemy
|

April 17th, 2005, 12:40 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 66
|
|
Yes Mr "Tex" Hill is still alive. And for the Doubting Thomas, Mr Ta 152....yes they were that good...they kicked some jap @ss...
__________________
Semper Fi,
Texas Fred
|

April 17th, 2005, 04:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Greater Chicago Metropolitan Area
Posts: 724
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TA152:
I just now noticed this post. It is surprising that they would put up a sculpture at this point in time. Most of them are probably dead by now.
Do you know of any books that give a "balanced" view of the Flying Tigers ? All the stuff I read on them make them out superheros but if they were so good why were they discontinued ? The PR on them is really good but is it true do you think ?
I know I would not want to take on a Zero or Oscar in a P-40. [img]graemlins/no.gif[/img]
|
From what I have read about the Flying Tigers they were effective enough, in the limited numbers that they could put up in the air as compared to the Japanese, so long as they stuck to Chennaults tactics. Attack from above, and never try to outturn or climb with a Zero or Oscar.
There is currently an article in WWII History Magazine that profiles a young Navy flyer who signed on with the AVG and it provides a figure for the number of Japanese planes that the Tigers accounted for as compared to their losses in combat. And I was frankly shocked not so much as to how many Japanese planes they accounted for but more as to how few pilots the AVG lost during that time frame. As I am not home right now I can not provide the exact numbers but I will be able to get them for you within the next day or so.
__________________
Bill Murray
Why do we press harder on the remote control when we know the batteries are getting weak?
|

April 17th, 2005, 11:38 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Greater Chicago Metropolitan Area
Posts: 724
|
|
Ok, the magazine was the May 2005 edition of World War II and the article was titled "A Flying Tiger's War". This article gives a brief overview of the war service of Peter Wright who resigned his commission in the US Navy when he was an ensign serving on the aircraft carrier Yorktown when he was recruited in June of 1941. The figures given by the article claim that the AVG shot down 297 aircraft while losing only 7 pilots themselves.
The only book in my personal library that I have read is "A Flying Tiger's Diary" by Charles Bond Major Gen. (ret) USAF. and Terry Anderson
Briefly looking at the book again it's claim on enemy planes shot down list 299 as confirmed which is pretty much in line with the 297 listed in the article mentioned before. Bond also lists that a suprisingly low number of only 10 AVG pilots were lost due to combat and gose on to mention that the AVG never had more 70 trained pilots or 49 planes ready for combat at any time during their time in China.
__________________
Bill Murray
Why do we press harder on the remote control when we know the batteries are getting weak?
|

April 18th, 2005, 12:27 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,943
|
|
Thanks for the informatin Bill. I guess there was alot of politics or something going on to not continue Gen. Chennault's tactics in the US armed forces. No one else had a 42 to 1 kill ratio during the war in the Pacific. I guess that is what I meant to ask in the first place, If it was such an effetive group why was it discontinued and the tactics not used anymore.
__________________
Work Harder ! Millions on welfare are depending on you.
|

April 18th, 2005, 01:16 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Greater Chicago Metropolitan Area
Posts: 724
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TA152:
Thanks for the informatin Bill. I guess there was alot of politics or something going on to not continue Gen. Chennault's tactics in the US armed forces. No one else had a 42 to 1 kill ratio during the war in the Pacific. I guess that is what I meant to ask in the first place, If it was such an effetive group why was it discontinued and the tactics not used anymore.
|
Another point that this article does indeed mention is Chennaults changing to a two plane formation of lead and wingman from the, at that time, traditional 3 plane formation of lead and 2 wigmen. This would be a tactic that the US Navy would adopt before the end of the war.
__________________
Bill Murray
Why do we press harder on the remote control when we know the batteries are getting weak?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:57 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |