Axis

Members: 4,317
Threads: 15,303
Posts: 191,543
Online: 250

Newest Member:
norwaypegasus

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > Theaters of the Second World War > War in the Pacific
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


War in the Pacific The Sino-Japanese War, the attack at Pearl Harbor to the atomic bombing of Nagasaki

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old June 28th, 2007, 02:18 PM
nimitz's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 21
nimitz is on a distinguished road
Default Fuso class

Displacement 34.700 tons
Length: 212,75m
Width: 30,64m
Depth: 9,69m
Speed 24,7kts
Crew 1.396
Armament 12 14in/45 (6x2)
16 5,5in/50 (16x1)
8 5in/40 DP (4x2)
20 25mm AA
Aircraft 3 Aircraft
Source (Lars Juel Mosbaek)

Fuso :



Yamashiro :

__________________

De Pearl Harbor à Hiroshima
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old June 28th, 2007, 03:12 PM
T. A. Gardner's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,025
T. A. Gardner is a jewel in the roughT. A. Gardner is a jewel in the roughT. A. Gardner is a jewel in the roughT. A. Gardner is a jewel in the roughT. A. Gardner is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Fuso class

Fuso and Yamashiro represent the two oldest battleships in service with the IJN during WW 2. These two ships had several weaknesses in their design that by WW 2 were serious deficiencies for first line service (ie use in the battleline versus say, fire support of amphibious operations).

The first, and probably most important was that their deck armor was very thin by WW 2 standards. This leaves them extremely vulnerable to heavy shell hits.

The second is that their internal subdivision was haphazard. This is excerbated by the disposition of the turrets and their magazines. In this class it could take as much as 15 minutes or more to get the ship fully to general quarters. This is due to narrow passageways, low overheads, lack of quick acting hatches and a maze of poorly laid out compartments. An additional problem was that the 3rd deck was the damage control deck, as was common in WW 1 as opposed to the 2nd deck that most navies were adopting or modifying their ships to by WW 2.

Another problem was that as these ships aged and underwent repeated modification their stability became more marginal. Because Japanese shipbuilding techniques of the period were by no means uniform it is not known exactly what these ship's metacentric height was. It is likely that they had not been inclined recently to determine what that height was as this was not regular practice for the Japanese at the time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
USS Borie DD 215 Clemson Class docshakes Information Requests 1 May 3rd, 2005 04:22 PM
Class A uniform 5-0-duce Militaria 0 September 1st, 2004 10:04 PM
Fletcher Class Destroyer Mahross Weapons in WWII 3 September 12th, 2003 04:39 PM
EK1st Class prices Kiwi Ace Militaria 9 February 27th, 2003 07:30 PM
Essex class Ron War in the Pacific 4 October 7th, 2000 07:49 AM


Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Allies