Axis

Members: 6,499
Threads: 18,469
Posts: 231,107
Online: 203

Newest Member:
Cpt. Spanky

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > Theaters of the Second World War > War in the Pacific
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


War in the Pacific The Sino-Japanese War, the attack at Pearl Harbor to the atomic bombing of Nagasaki

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old May 9th, 2008, 09:19 PM
mikebatzel's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NEPA/Scranton(close enough)
Posts: 1,260
Salute!: 49
Saluted 34 Times in 29 Posts
mikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nice
Default Battle of Kolombangara - July 1943

After the inconclusive Battle of Kula Gulf, RADM Ainsworth was eager to again engage the Japanese, thinking he had put a serious hurt on them. The Japanese would only make him wait a week. The American campaign to take Vila was not going particularly well, and a Tokyo Express run threatened to tip the balance in favor of the Japanese. Ainsworth had since been reinforced to compensate for lost and damaged ships and his Force now consisted of the light cruisers Honolulu, St Louis, and HMNZS Leander, and destroyers Nicholas, O’Bannon, Taylor, Jenkins, Radford, Ralph Talbot, Buchanan, Maury, Woodworth, and Gwin

On the night of 12-13 July the Japanese where on there way to reinforce Vila. The Japanese force, led by RADM Izaki, consisted of two parts. The Transport group, consisting of destroyers Satsuki, Minazuki, Yunagi, and Matsukaze, and the Support Group consisting of light cruiser Jintsu and destroyers Mikazuki, Yukikaze, Hamakaze, Kiyonami, and Yugure. The Japanese also had a new invention that would debut in the battle. A brand new radar-location devise would allow the Japanese to see where the Americans where by sensing the electronic impulses created by radar.

At 0036 a PBY Catalina spotted the Japanese column some 26 miles distant from the task force moving southwest. Ainsworth deployed the force in a single column with half the destroyers in the van and half in the rear of his cruisers.
Detecting the Japanese on radar at 0100 with visual contact a mere three minutes later, Ainsworth once again believed he had achieved complete surprise on the Japanese force. Once again he was dead wrong, as the new radar-detection devise apparently had a range much greater than the radar itself. Izaki had actually known of the Allied presence for nearly two hours. Ainsworth turned his cruisers 30 degrees stb and ordered the van destroyers to increase speed for torpedo attack.

Izaki was able to use the new device to accurately plot the approach of the Allied ships. The Japanese began to launch torpedoes at 0108 followed by the US destroyers at 0110 with a range of 10.000 yards. As the torpedoes got underway, Jintsu turned on her searchlights and opened fire. The Allied cruisers replied by 0112 and just five minutes later Jintsu was already dead in the water at the time she was struck by an American torpedo. By 0130 Jintsu would be on the receiving end of close to 3000 shells fired her way (of course not all hit her).

Around the time Jintsu was being hit by a torpedo, Ainsworth ordered his force to move south. Leander would make the turn wide and at 0122 suffered severe damage at the hands of a Japanese long lance. Radford and Jenkins would escort her away from the battle to safety.

Mikazuki stayed with Jintsu while the other four destroyers of the support group sped north to reload the torpedo tubes. Reloading was completed by 0140 and the Japanese turned back south to catch the remaining allied ships. Ainsworth had sent Nicholas, O’Bannon, and Taylor to chase the Japanese and at around 0140 they finished off the sinking Jintsu with a few more fish.

The battle should have ended here with the remaining forces heading in opposite directions but both turned back towards each other. Ainsworth had once again assumed a great victory and turned back north to finish of any cripples. At 0156 Honolulu detected a group of ships on radar. Ainsworth, not knowing the exact location of his own destroyers, attempted to identify the ships o no avail. Finally, to assist in the identification, Ainsworth ordered the ships lit up with star shells. At 0205 the ships where illuminated and it was observed that they where turning north in a way that made it appear like they had just launched torpedoes. The Allied task force was ordered to turn so the ships guns could fire.

Before any shots could be fired St Louis was struck in the bow by a torpedo as well as Honolulu in the same location. In addition Honolulu was hit in the stern with a dud. Gwin took one amidships, and Buchanan collided with Woodworth in an attempt to comb the torpedoes. Gwin would be scuttled the next day.

Overall the battle was a huge Allied defeat. The Japanese where able to land another 1200 troops on Villa with the loss of one cruiser, While the Allies suffered three heavily damaged cruisers and one sunk destroyer. Other than the Jintsu all other Japanese ships escaped without damage. However, the allies did achieve the result of preventing KulaGulf from being used again by the Japanese to resupply Munda setting up the future battle of VellaGulf.



__________________
"Like so many of our people, we have now had a personal experience of German barbarity which only strengthens the resolution of all of us to fight through to final victory."-King George VI
"Casualties many; Percentage of dead not known; Combat efficiency; we are winning."-Colonel David M. Shoup-Saipan
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old May 12th, 2008, 10:59 PM
mikebatzel's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NEPA/Scranton(close enough)
Posts: 1,260
Salute!: 49
Saluted 34 Times in 29 Posts
mikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nicemikebatzel is just really nice
Default Re: Battle of Kolombangara - July 1943

Another pic of the USS Honolulu. this from the side


Just curious. does anyone read these obscure battle posts? I will keep writing anyways because the men who fought them deserve to be remembered. As I said just curious.
__________________
"Like so many of our people, we have now had a personal experience of German barbarity which only strengthens the resolution of all of us to fight through to final victory."-King George VI
"Casualties many; Percentage of dead not known; Combat efficiency; we are winning."-Colonel David M. Shoup-Saipan
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old May 12th, 2008, 11:27 PM
Devilsadvocate's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: St. Helens, OR
Posts: 783
Salute!: 6
Saluted 29 Times in 25 Posts
Devilsadvocate is a jewel in the roughDevilsadvocate is a jewel in the roughDevilsadvocate is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Battle of Kolombangara - July 1943

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebatzel View Post
Another pic of the USS Honolulu. this from the side


Just curious. does anyone read these obscure battle posts? I will keep writing anyways because the men who fought them deserve to be remembered. As I said just curious.

I don't know about any others, but I read them. To me the Battle of Kolombangara is not obscure, any more than First or Second Naval Battles of Guadalcanal. There is an excellent eyewitness account of the Battle of Kolombangara by the Executive Officer of the Maury DD-401 in the book "South Pacific Destroyer" by Russell Crenshaw. Crenshaw started out as gunnery officer of the Maury and served through much of the Solomon's campaign. His version differs a bit from yours, but only in a few details which is understandable The USN/RAN forces suffered from poor communications during the battle which accounts for much of the confusion apparent on the Allied side.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old May 13th, 2008, 02:24 AM
Slipdigit's Avatar
Good Ol' Boy
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Deep in the Heart of Dixie
Posts: 5,350
Salute!: 55
Saluted 49 Times in 42 Posts
Slipdigit is a name known to allSlipdigit is a name known to allSlipdigit is a name known to allSlipdigit is a name known to allSlipdigit is a name known to allSlipdigit is a name known to allSlipdigit is a name known to allSlipdigit is a name known to all
Default Re: Battle of Kolombangara - July 1943

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebatzel View Post
Just curious. does anyone read these obscure battle posts? I will keep writing anyways because the men who fought them deserve to be remembered. As I said just curious.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilsadvocate View Post
I don't know about any others, but I read them. To me the Battle of Kolombangara is not obscure, any more than First or Second Naval Battles of Guadalcanal. There is an excellent eyewitness account of the Battle of Kolombangara by the Executive Officer of the Maury DD-401 in the book "South Pacific Destroyer" by Russell Crenshaw. Crenshaw started out as gunnery officer of the Maury and served through much of the Solomon's campaign. His version differs a bit from yours, but only in a few details which is understandable The USN/RAN forces suffered from poor communications during the battle which accounts for much of the confusion apparent on the Allied side.
Ditto for me, Mike. I read them to see if there is anything I might be able to add. Keep it up, Old Boy!
__________________
Best Regards,
JW

Flag of the State of Alabama
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
guadalcanal, kolombangara, pacific, pto, solomons

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To the Last - Kursk Salient, July 1943 razorboy Modelling 2 April 27th, 2008 11:30 AM
Battle of Kursk July 1943 the greatest tanks battle milos31 WWII Films & TV 3 December 12th, 2007 11:01 PM
July 20 jpatterson WWII Today 0 July 20th, 2005 03:44 PM
605 Sqn loss 27 July 1943 Stevin Information Requests 4 September 7th, 2003 07:43 PM


Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Allies