Axis

Members: 17,876
Threads: 35,132
Posts: 408,552
Online: 317

Newest Member:
musicmylve

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > General Discussion > Weapons & Technology in WWII
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Weapons & Technology in WWII Discussion about the Weapons, War Machines and the technology it took to create them during World War Two.


Reply
 
LinkBack (3) Thread Tools
  3 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2003, 12:21 PM
Onthefield's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 596
Salute!: 1
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Onthefield is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

During World War II, M1 Garands were shipped to all our major allies -- Great Britain, Nationalist China and all Latin American allied belligerents. After their liberation, we reequipped the entire Free French Army, then did the same for Belgian, Philippine and some Italian forces. Allied fighting forces from occupied countries included those from Poland, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and Greece. In the immediate aftermath of the war. M1 Garands were furnished to Norway, Denmark, Italy, the Japanese Defense Forces, South Korea and the new States of Israel. Some of these rifles were returned in later years and more were shipped during the Cold War as military aid. How many hundreds of thousands of the 6 million M1 Garands were sent overseas as military aid will probably never be known. Meanwhile, those M1 Garands that served with U.S. forces saw service from the Korean peninsula to the Dominican Republic before being retired. A very few were supplied to civilian match shooters through the Director of Civilian Marksmanship program and many hundreds of thousand more were destroyed, cut up with torches or band saw, or crushed and sold for scrap metal. So, as a rule of thumb, any M1 Garand marked with an importer's stamp has probably had the vast majority of its parts replaced.
Well the M-1 seems to be a really good weapon and according to what I've read, this gun has proven it's designer noteworthy and the gun an amazing piece of technology. Being the first semi-automatic designated service rifle, this is a sweet gun; also serving in all theaters in World War II as well as Korea and the beginning of Vietnam being replaced by the short lived M-14 and then later the M-16. [img]smile.gif[/img]

[ 11. October 2003, 07:23 AM: Message edited by: Onthefield ]
__________________
Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it- Sun Tzu
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2003, 04:40 PM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 10,254
Salute!: 89
Saluted 243 Times in 139 Posts
Martin Bull has disabled reputation
Cool

That's interesting - I've never read before that the M1 Garand was used anywhere by British forces. The logistical problem of incompatible ammunition must mean that they were stored somewhere ?

I know that old P14 and Ross Rifles were issued to the Home Guard in .303 rimmed & that small numbers of M1 carbines carried unofficially by airborne forces. Thompsons and .45 Colt Pistols were issued so supplies of .45 ACP were available.
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2003, 11:58 PM
No.9's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,398
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
No.9 is an unknown quantity at this point
I've never read before that the M1 Garand was used anywhere by British forces.

What did you expect No.1 Commando used in Torch when they were issued American helmets and weapons?

No.9
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old October 12th, 2003, 12:25 AM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 10,254
Salute!: 89
Saluted 243 Times in 139 Posts
Martin Bull has disabled reputation
There you go - I'm always ready to learn.... [img]smile.gif[/img]
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old October 12th, 2003, 11:11 AM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 17,853
Salute!: 707
Saluted 367 Times in 261 Posts
Kai-Petri has disabled reputation
Post

Sorry for changing the subject here but did the British use the US uniforms because the French would not discuss things with the British? I think I´ve read something like this. How many British wore US uniforms and I think I read as well that the British were lead by US commanders as well to make it easier for the French to co-operate and surrender??

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old October 13th, 2003, 10:34 AM
Onthefield's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 596
Salute!: 1
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Onthefield is an unknown quantity at this point
The M1 Garand was in the words of General Patton "The greatest battle implement ever devised". You must remember that in the early 1900's that no other governments were thinking of mass producing a self-loading service rifle. The idea to mass produced a self-loading rifle with interchangeable parts was beyond the realm of most governments with their decentralized armament manufactures. The design of a self loading rifle started as early as 1919 with several examples being produced in limited quantity. In 1929 the grandfather of the Garand rifle came to be. It's designer was a brilliant man named John Cantius Garand. His idea of a gas operated self-loading rifle remains one of the most accurate and reliable designs to this day. The first Garand rifle was chambered in .276 caliber, which was in favor with the military at its time of design. In 1932 it was decided to switch the caliber to the popular and already stockedpiled .30-06. 1936 marked the beginning of the end of all military bolt action service rifles. with the adoption of the "U.S. Semiautomatic Rifle, Caliber .30, M1". With the thoughts of another European war approaching production was stepped up. It was decided that the M1 was to be placed on a priority list for war production items. And Winchester expressed interest in receiving a production contract. Winchester received their contract in 1939 to produce the M1. World War Two produced over 4 million Garands.

http://www2.fwi.com/%7Efwalter/Garandpage.htm

A little history about the M-1 Garand is always a good thing.
__________________
Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it- Sun Tzu
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old October 14th, 2003, 11:56 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 306
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smoke286 is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

I think your misquoting Patton I believe he actually made that statement about the jeep
__________________
Ain't no rocket scientists in the firehall
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old October 15th, 2003, 06:16 AM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 10,254
Salute!: 89
Saluted 243 Times in 139 Posts
Martin Bull has disabled reputation
I've seen the quote about Patton and the M1 Garand cited in several firearms books.

I wonder when and in what context he said it ?
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old October 15th, 2003, 09:21 AM
Onthefield's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 596
Salute!: 1
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Onthefield is an unknown quantity at this point
Unhappy

Martin, Patton said that about the M-1 in the report to the Ordance Department during the fighting at Bataan on January 26, 1945

"Under combat conditions it operated with no mechanical defects and when used in foxholes did not develop stoppages from dust or dirt. It has been in almost constant action for as much as a week without cleaning or lubricatio. In my opinion, the M1 Rifle is the greatest battle implement ever devised." General George S. Patton Jr. reported to the Ordnance Department on January 26, 1945.


__________________
Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it- Sun Tzu
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old October 16th, 2003, 10:03 AM
Onthefield's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 596
Salute!: 1
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Onthefield is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

THE M1-D GARAND SNIPER RIFLE

This rare firearm was adopted during World War II and saw continued service through the Korean and Vietnam Wars. The most noteable difference between the M1-D and the standard M1 Service rifle lies in the scope mounting system. The "D" incorporates a special barrel which is fitted with an integral mounting block or "base". The scope mount is attached to this by a large knurled knob, allowing for easy installation and removal of the telescope unit. The M84 scope is steel bodied with an adjustable post and cross hair sighting system. It's unique and rugged design allows for complete disassembly and repair as well a field-simple adjustments for windage and elevation.

The gun was good enough to make a sniper rifle out of it as well as an infantry weapon.
__________________
Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it- Sun Tzu
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old October 19th, 2003, 12:05 PM
Onthefield's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 596
Salute!: 1
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Onthefield is an unknown quantity at this point
The M1 Garand was the weapon of choice for infantry. The M1 Carbine, half the weight and with a less powerful cartridge, was the weapon of choice for support troops, and others not primarily involved in infantry combat. It was designed to meet combat needs less demanding than the M1 Rifle, but more than can be met by the M1911A1 pistol. It was more convenient to use than the M1, and less intrusive to their other duties, while still much more effective than hand guns.

The M1 Carbine: the War Baby. Baby because it was so much a 3/4 scale rifle; War Baby because it was the product of an urgently conceived requirement equally urgently satisfied by "Carbine" Williams and his colleagues at Winchester.

The Carbine was intended to "fill the gap" between the 9+ pound, full power M1 Rifle and the capable, but limited by its caliber, M1911A1 pistol. The intended user was the officer, the artilleryman, the signalman, the truck driver and the like, for whom the M1 Rifle was just too big and inconvenient to be practical, but who also needed a weapon with more useable reach than the pistol. At any but point-blank ranges the Carbine was easier to hit with than the pistol, too. More than 6 million Carbines were produced by a plethora of contractors, from hardware manufacturers to jukebox companies.
http://www.fulton-armory.com/M1_Carb.htm
__________________
Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it- Sun Tzu
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old November 3rd, 2003, 02:54 PM
Onthefield's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 596
Salute!: 1
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Onthefield is an unknown quantity at this point
Does anyone have any good pictures of the M1 Garand or any of the other guns I mentioned that they can put on here?
__________________
Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it- Sun Tzu
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old November 4th, 2003, 02:15 PM
Onthefield's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 596
Salute!: 1
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Onthefield is an unknown quantity at this point
Does anyone have any info on the P08 Luger, I can't seem to find anything good. Greatly appreciated!
__________________
Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it- Sun Tzu
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old November 4th, 2003, 02:24 PM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 10,254
Salute!: 89
Saluted 243 Times in 139 Posts
Martin Bull has disabled reputation
Unhappy

The Luger has its' very own Forum at : -

http://www.lugerforum.com/

With great picture galleries and plenty of historical info.
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old November 5th, 2003, 12:53 PM
Onthefield's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 596
Salute!: 1
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Onthefield is an unknown quantity at this point
Thanks Martin!!! I'm definetly going to scrounge some information off there.
__________________
Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it- Sun Tzu
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old November 14th, 2003, 08:16 PM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 17,853
Salute!: 707
Saluted 367 Times in 261 Posts
Kai-Petri has disabled reputation
Post

8.8 cm PAK 43/41 A emergency solution due to shortage of carriages for the PAK 43, the last barrel married with the carriage of the FH 18 and the sFH 18 wheels, too heavy, loved for his punch and hated for the difficulties to move

The Pak 43 / 41 was the preferred weapon for mobile anti-tank crews while the Pak 43 with its 360' traverse was more suited for semi-fixed positions

A pic for 43/41:

http://www.smhq.org/history/pak43-41.jpg

--------------

The Pak 43



When mounted on a carriage like that of the old Flak 18, the new 88 is called the 8.8-cm Pak 43.

http://www.lonesentry.com/new88mm/

The weight difference is clear:

For Pak 43/41 4380 kgs and Pak 43 3650 kgs
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old November 20th, 2003, 08:58 PM
Onthefield's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 596
Salute!: 1
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Onthefield is an unknown quantity at this point
Unhappy

Some interesting stuff about the Thompson Sub Machine Gun.
Despite its excellent test performance, the Thompson was not adopted for use by either the US Army or Marine Corps. Still, Thompson contracted with Colt for the manufacture of 15,000 guns, designated "Thompson Submachine Gun, Model of 1921". The 15,000 guns manufactured by Colt lasted until the eve of World War II. In 1940, the U.S. Army ordered 20,000 Thompson submachine guns; in 1941 the Army ordered an additional 319,000.
__________________
Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it- Sun Tzu
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old November 21st, 2003, 03:56 AM
No.9's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,398
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
No.9 is an unknown quantity at this point
Supplementary trivia

In 1940 Britain had precisely 40 in its arsenal. There could have been more, made in Britain, but prior to this time, BSA (Birmingham Small Arms) declined a license to manufacture. The new Commandos were to use these, but, only being 40 there obviously wasn’t enough to go round. So, to start with, the guns were drawn as required before an operation, and returned afterwards.

On the first Commando raid, Operation Collar, the guns were issued just prior with little more instruction than of the 'pull this, squeeze this' variety. On the night, CO Ronnie Tod found himself midway between the Commando’s boat and some Germans moving down the beach. Swinging into action, Ronnie raised his Thompson, pulled back the bolt, and the magazine dropped out!!! (good one Ron)

No.9

[ 23. November 2003, 11:18 PM: Message edited by: No.9 ]
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old November 21st, 2003, 04:51 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 274
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tony Williams has a spectacular aura aboutTony Williams has a spectacular aura about
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Onthefield:
The design of a self loading rifle started as early as 1919 with several examples being produced in limited quantity.
The first self-loading rifles were made in the 19th century, and several were used in WW1 (the Germans in particular used Mauser and Mondragon self-loaders as aircraft armament). The first army to officially adopt a self-loader as standard was (believe it or not) the Mexican army before WW1 which selected the Mondragon, although I'm not sure they ever received them as WW1 got in the way.

In WW2 the German and Russian armies both used large quantities of self-loaders. However, these were all reserved for special units as they were considered too complex, expensive and difficult to maintain for standard issue. The US Army was therefore the first major army to issue a self-loader as its standard infantry rifle. There was nothing very special or new about the Garand's design, but it was a well-thought out and reliable weapon.

Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and Discussion forum
__________________
Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old November 21st, 2003, 05:39 AM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 10,254
Salute!: 89
Saluted 243 Times in 139 Posts
Martin Bull has disabled reputation
Arrow

Thanks for the info Tony and BTW, good to see you on the Forums again !
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old December 3rd, 2003, 05:11 PM
Onthefield's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 596
Salute!: 1
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Onthefield is an unknown quantity at this point
Does anyone know what type of machine guns were used by the 101st airborne division and also I've always wondered how the men jumped with their guns? Were they attached to them or in their foot bags and if they were attached how were they so that they wouldn't fall off?
__________________
Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it- Sun Tzu
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old December 3rd, 2003, 05:33 PM
Friedrich's Avatar
Ace
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Citizen of the world, though quite misantropic!
Posts: 6,506
Salute!: 15
Saluted 26 Times in 16 Posts
Friedrich Is actually quite decentFriedrich Is actually quite decent
Here are some 'Garand' pictures:




And a photo of Soviet 'Tokarev' and 'Simonov' rifles:

__________________
"War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." - Jean Dutourd, French veteran of both world wars

"A mon fils: depuis que tes yeux sont fermes les miens n’ont cessé de pleurir." - Mère française, Verdun
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old December 3rd, 2003, 06:53 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 478
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Eisenhower is an unknown quantity at this point
OTF,
I believe the guns were broken down and split up between the gunner and assistant gunner. As for how they were attached, I think it was up to the person. There are a lot of accounts of gunners losing their bipod or actual gun because they lost their footbag, but I think it would make sense to strap it to your chest like a regular rifleman would with his garand or something. As for the gun itself, I'm really not sure. I'll look some more.
__________________
You are about to embark on the great crusade towards which we have striven these many months - Eisenhower
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old December 3rd, 2003, 07:23 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 478
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Eisenhower is an unknown quantity at this point
Okay, after looking for a bit more I know that they were 30 cal. machine guns and I'm guessing they were Brownings?! I dunno...here's a great model I found on another forum...pretty nice.
there's tons more models, but I'm saving em for the weapons quiz
__________________
You are about to embark on the great crusade towards which we have striven these many months - Eisenhower
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old December 4th, 2003, 12:49 PM
Onthefield's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 596
Salute!: 1
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Onthefield is an unknown quantity at this point
Unhappy

I hear you Ike but thanks for the info. I was wondering about that because I'm now reading Band of Brothers, all this talk about Ambrose has got me interested in his other books I haven't read.
__________________
Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it- Sun Tzu
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2010, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.

Allies