|
|  |
 |
Members: 6,501
Threads: 18,473
Posts: 231,124
Online: 247
Newest Member:
nazi_akash |
|
|
| Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two |

February 18th, 2001, 04:06 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bflo NY USA
Posts: 95
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
Sure, they kept Werner & co. out of the Volksturm Battalions, but was the German Rocket-bomb program just so much "Sturm und Drang"
Consider:
On the order of 10,000 V-1s launched...
2,500 or so hit ANYTHING, let alone something worthwhile.
V-2: Better, but basically a collosal investment to deliver a "thousand-pounder"
Would Germany have been better off using these resources elsewhere altogether?
Would defensive efforts like the "Wasserfall" anti-aircraft rocket have been a better focus?
Comments.....
------------------
Novus Ordo Seclorum
|

February 18th, 2001, 07:10 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Piscataway, NJ USA
Posts: 607
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
If they had a "Wasserfall" program i still think the $$ and material would have been better off in the jet program. I don't think they could have effected the war on a great scale. While the jets had the possibility of slowing the war more than antiaircraft missles.
|

February 20th, 2001, 01:19 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bflo NY USA
Posts: 95
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
True!
Especially given the consideration that Heinkel had a jet ready to go in '42...
Presume the Me262 to have been a better aircraft, but Willy Messerschmitt had better political connections, and Heinkel never DID get their big bomber off the ground thanks to Milch's crazy requirement that all bombers be capable of dive bombing!
------------------
Novus Ordo Seclorum
|

August 8th, 2001, 10:15 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 308
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
Forgive my late reply
The Vergeltungswaffen programs started long before the war even before the nazi;s came into power, it was regarded a way to bypass the Versaille treaty by using not registered weapons.
__________________
Wenn ist das Nunstrück git und Slotermeyer? Ja!.. Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
Monty Python's Killing Joke
|

August 8th, 2001, 10:16 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 308
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
Forgive my late reply
The Vergeltungswaffen programs started long before the war even before the nazi;s came into power, it was regarded a way to bypass the Versaille treaty by using not registered weapons.
__________________
Wenn ist das Nunstrück git und Slotermeyer? Ja!.. Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
Monty Python's Killing Joke
|

August 8th, 2001, 10:33 PM
|
 |
GröFaZ 
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,032
Salute!: 44
Saluted 54 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Welcome aboard popski, and a nice first comment too.
As popski said, and many people forget, the germans started rocket research in the 20's, back when von Braun was a 17 year old aspiring rocket scientist.
Most people also don't know that the pioneer of modern rocketry was a american named Robert Goddard. Early on, German scientists used many of his patents to further their nascent rocket program.
__________________
WWII Forums Rogues Gallery - send in your photo!
Comments, questions or feedback? Contact me at
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance." Socrates
|

August 9th, 2001, 02:10 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bflo NY USA
Posts: 95
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Point taken, my good popski, and thanx for that data, which I was unaware of!
And Herr Otto, (did you have plastic surgery to look like Erwin Rommel or is it merely an amazing coincidence?  )
I do realize both that the German rocket program was begun before the nazi epoch, and that R.Goddard's research, while largely ignored in America, was pored over by the German "rocket men"...
Nonetheless kammeraden, I stand by my earlier comments.
Without a nuclear warhead, the V-rockets were impressive white elephants at best. They just didn't DO enough to justify the resources they consumed. Even way-out stuff like the Me-163 Komet was a better use of rocket tech, although the thought of climbing into what was basically two tanks of explosive liquid with wings and guns bolted on and a hole at the back must have made a few pilots queasy!
__________________
Novus Ordo Seclorum
|

August 9th, 2001, 03:39 AM
|
 |
Expert
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 14,564
Salute!: 76
Saluted 34 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
Glad to see you hier Popski.
Also, just in case it might be of interest to you, I happen to know a man who worked with Werhner von Braun, he is also an ex-Heer Artillerie Offizier.
__________________
Lost are only those, who abandon themselves) Hans-Ulrich Rudel.
|

August 9th, 2001, 02:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 308
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
G'day mates
The use by the germans of the Me 163 is indeed a sort of kamikaze fighter. Because of priorities in the weapondevelopment in other area's and the limited resources in material and personal the defensive weapons were developed late during the war. The Me 163 would not have been used if the germans weren't so despirate. If you weren't shot down in air or on the ground you had the chance of being dissolved alive.
Popski[/list]
__________________
Wenn ist das Nunstrück git und Slotermeyer? Ja!.. Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
Monty Python's Killing Joke
|

June 23rd, 2002, 11:57 PM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,224
Salute!: 15
Saluted 45 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
V2s - lest we forget
I'd just like to chip in here. I shan't argue whether resources could have been better used ( I think Me262 personally )
But my mother lived in East London throughout the war and has always told me that her family didn't fear the Blitz ( they could cope with the thought of aircraft ), the V1s were hated ( big blast )- but 'you could hear them coming'. The V2 was something different - no warning at all from a clear blue sky.
The ordinary public were really scared by these things and my Mum has always thought that if Germany had had a lot of them, or earlier, who knows ? Another 'What If?'.
But - they were not ineffctual.
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

June 24th, 2002, 02:54 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Citizen of the world, though quite misantropic!
Posts: 6,393
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
Another what if was the initial development of a new electric huge submarine, capable of launching V2s vertically. Specially to bomb the USA's Eastern cities... It was just on paper, but I think the allies kept that idea and how are sub Boomer nowadays?
__________________
"War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." - Jean Dutourd, French veteran of both world wars
"A mon fils: depuis que tes yeux sont fermes les miens n’ont cessé de pleurir." - Mère française, Verdun
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:11 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |