Axis

Members: 5,144
Threads: 16,679
Posts: 206,908
Online: 207

Newest Member:
bigtone

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > General Discussion > Weapons in WWII
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old August 8th, 2003, 04:32 PM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,081
Martin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of light
Cool

Just about every combatant nation issued grenade launchers to their footsoldiers. The books are full of technical specs and photos - but - WERE THEY ANY USE ?

I've read no end of first-hand combat accounts from all sides : all describe using handguns, smallarms, mortars, grenades, entrenching tools, knives - even throwing rocks - but I can't recall one that describes using the grenade-launcher.

Judging from the number of 'dug-up' launchers which are found, it seems to me that - along with the gas mask - the grenade launcher was the first thing that soldiers liked to consign to the nearest ditch !

Any thoughts ?
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old August 8th, 2003, 04:58 PM
Mahross's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Cabinet War Rooms
Posts: 1,485
Mahross is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Martin I have just finished Martin Marix Evans '1918 Year of Victories' and in their some of the comments made by US soldier make me think they found them quite effective and actually liked them. They just said dont fire it from the shoulder [img]graemlins/no.gif[/img]

I've never read any reference to them in ww2 to though. But didn't US rangers use them at Pointe du Hoc and on D-Day.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old August 8th, 2003, 07:36 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 324
Greenjacket is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Most of what I've read about them concerns the First World War - the British Army apparently used them to great effect combined into small tactical teams with Lewis guns, hand grenades, and rifles with fixed bayonets.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old August 8th, 2003, 11:59 PM
T. A. Gardner's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,235
T. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really nice
Post

Well, from photographic and many histories written by veterans, at least the US made widespread use of rifle grenades. The M7 launcher was provided on a scale of one per squad. A favorite from pictures, particularly for urban fighting, was to replace the M1 rifle grenade (a base onto which a standard fragmentation grenade was clipped) with a 60mm mortar bomb. The M9A1 anti-tank grenade was also used but not as widely as the bazooka.
As many of the German rifle grenades were small and relatively worthless as weapons they may have seen less use.
__________________
Truth is stranger than bullshit!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old August 9th, 2003, 12:23 AM
No.9's Avatar
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,398
No.9 is an unknown quantity at this point
I’ve heard WWII vets mention them on occasion, but with infinitely less frequency than the 2 inch mortar and certainly without affection. The cup launchers fitted the Enfield’s, but used to ruined the rifle thereafter as an accurate bullet weapon. Hence, the operator had to carry a second weapon and, this being the case, the 2 inch mortar was much more versatile and effective than a rifle grenade.

The blank to launch the grenade was a longer and more substantive charge than the regular bullet, so the selected rifle was normally banded in one or two places with wire or a steel strap. Firing made a much larger bang than a normal round, one man told me he attributes his deafness in one ear to being next to one these things went it was fired.

No.9
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old August 9th, 2003, 06:36 AM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,081
Martin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of light
Arrow

Many thanks for your input, everyone.

From the material it would seem to be another case of WWII being fought with WW1's weapons. I can understand that in a static situation, with the enemy close by in a known location, and with room to set one's weapon up in concealment, the rifle grenade would be useful. That pretty well describes trench warfare.....

But WWII was of course far more fluid thus rendering the grenade launcher of limited use. For the record, the well-known group of photos of 12th SS HJ men in a Normandy farmyard clearly show a G Gr Ger 98k launcher fitted to a K98 but otherwise, 'action' photos seem fairly rare....
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old August 11th, 2003, 03:11 PM
T. A. Gardner's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,235
T. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really nice
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Martin Bull:
Many thanks for your input, everyone.

From the material it would seem to be another case of WWII being fought with WW1's weapons. I can understand that in a static situation, with the enemy close by in a known location, and with room to set one's weapon up in concealment, the rifle grenade would be useful. That pretty well describes trench warfare.....

But WWII was of course far more fluid thus rendering the grenade launcher of limited use. For the record, the well-known group of photos of 12th SS HJ men in a Normandy farmyard clearly show a G Gr Ger 98k launcher fitted to a K98 but otherwise, 'action' photos seem fairly rare....
Action photos of US troops using rifle grenades are much more common. The US grenade launcher having been liberally supplied (on checking the issue was 7 per squad but most squads only kept one or two). The M9A1 anti-tank grenade was very popular. It was as effective as the bazooka round and the troops liked it because they didn't have to carry an extra, bulky, weapon to use it. The M1 with grenade launcher fitted could still be used as a standard rifle so there was little to detract from the use of the grenade launcher. Against bunkers and in urban fighting US troops made liberal use of these weapons finding them accurate enough to fire the grenade through the firing port of a bunker or the window of a house at up to 50+ yards.
So, while the German rifle grenades were not widely used due to their relative ineffectiveness and the complexity of the launcher cup etc, and the British one for reasons described earlier in this thread, the US did use rifle grenades frequently in combat.
__________________
Truth is stranger than bullshit!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old August 11th, 2003, 05:13 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 74
Langemann is an unknown quantity at this point
I am the proud owner of a German WWII rifle grenade launcher and pouch. The only items that I am missing is the sight and the take down tool. It is a two piece construction with the locking mechanism being made out of cast iron with the tube being machined. The blank round used to fire the grenade is a normal size 8mm blank that is either crimped or wood tipped.

From the research that I have done, it seems that the HE rounds performed considerablly better than the AP. It seems that the Heer and the SS competed in the field of grenade rounds, as the SS had their own "Special" AP rounds that were larger and did more damage than their Heer counterparts.

Langemann
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old August 11th, 2003, 07:38 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Myllykoski, Finland
Posts: 60
Juha Tompuri is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Hi!

About armour penetration and warhead weight (about):
-M9A1 AT Rifle grenade: 113g warhead, 100mm
penetration
-2.36 in Rocket Launcher M1: 227g warhead, 120mm penetration
-SS Gewehr Panzergranate 61: 240g warhead, 125mm
penetration

Regards, Juha

[ 11. August 2003, 02:40 PM: Message edited by: Juha Tompuri ]
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old August 13th, 2003, 04:37 PM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,081
Martin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of light
Arrow

Thanks again, everyone !

Your launcher set sounds nice, Langemann. I too have a mint condition pouch , with a very relic condition G Gr Ger K98k launcher from the Ardennes battlefield. But it's an interesting piece of ordnance and prompted me to raise this thread....
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old August 13th, 2003, 05:31 PM
Stefan's Avatar
Cavalry Rupert
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sheffield/Herts, England
Posts: 3,679
Stefan is a jewel in the roughStefan is a jewel in the roughStefan is a jewel in the roughStefan is a jewel in the roughStefan is a jewel in the rough
Post

I can't help thinking that for an infantryman a rifle grenade would be fantastic, it would provide them with a way of chucking grenades far further than by hand without needing to carry a large mortar around with them. Also, there are things a grenade launcher could do that a morter can not, for example put grenades through windows and gun ports.
__________________
There's no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is nothing good in war. Except its ending.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old August 13th, 2003, 07:18 PM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,081
Martin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of light
That's what I was wondering, Stefan - it's just slightly odd that they're hardly ever mentioned in first-hand accounts of infantry combat
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old August 14th, 2003, 04:24 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 74
Langemann is an unknown quantity at this point
During this past year, I actually put a rifle grenade round through a window of a 2nd story building. At Camp Gruber, OK for this past year's D-Day event, I put a round through a window and took out 4 GI's at about 150 yards. Based on this single event, I can only imagine how much a weapon of this type must have boosted the front line troops morale when it was used on the field.

Truely a very unique experience!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old August 15th, 2003, 06:07 AM
No.9's Avatar
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,398
No.9 is an unknown quantity at this point
Speaking with a veteran today of No.1 Commando who was in Burma, I asked about issue and use of cup dischargers. He said they were not often issued and when they were it was usually 2 per Troop, a Troop usually being @ 65 men. The cup had two sprung clips that allowed simple snap fitting on an enfield. However, the rifle used was no longer suitable for normal accurate bullet fire so only dedicated rifles were used and the men carrying them usually also carried a Colt .45 pistol. The extra strength blank needed produced a very violent trigger action and the gunner had to adopt a technique to avoid breaking his finger.





“They were not of much use in the jungle as you could usually throw a grenade as far as the vegetation would allow.”

A while ago there was a discussion on use of shotguns in WWII. As they were popular in Nam jungle fighting I asked him about WWII. He said they never had any nor did he ever hear talk of any.

No.9
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old August 15th, 2003, 06:14 AM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,081
Martin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of light
Arrow

Thanks, No. 9 - that's interesting stuff. [img]smile.gif[/img]
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old August 16th, 2003, 04:21 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Waukegan, Illinois
Posts: 310
Greg A is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

My dad said when he was in the Army in the early 60s they still used the M-1 Garand and he trained with the rifle grenade. He said it was pretty much useless in terms of accuracy and the moview like SPR where they show the soldier firing from the shoulder just isn't true. He said that it would bust your shoulder if you fired it that way.

Greg
__________________
"There are times when a Corps Commander's life does not count"
-General Winfield Scott Hancock at Gettysburg, July 3, 1863
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old August 17th, 2003, 11:23 PM
TheRedBaron's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: An underground bunker...
Posts: 2,112
TheRedBaron has a spectacular aura aboutTheRedBaron has a spectacular aura about
Post

Yet again a topic when I aint got the books with me... dam being on holiday!!!

I do have some primary german sources which discuss the use of rifle grenades but it seems from reading them that they may well have been a case of too much hassle in a fluid battle situation and much more useful in positional defensive fighting. The Germans certainly used them, I have several photos of them in use, oddly mainly on the Eastern Front, but one from Normandy. I would have thought a light mortar would be of far more use???
__________________
"Watch that Fu*ker, he'll 'ave someones eye out!" King Harold at Hastings 1066.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old August 21st, 2003, 09:40 AM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,081
Martin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of light
Thanks to Deutsche e-bay(!) have just added a Gross Gew. Pz. Gr. rifle grenade to my collection, in mint condition and at very reasonable cost.

Ian V. Hogg in his 'Encyclopedia Of Infantry Weapons Of WWII' sums it up by saying :

'The number of different ( German ) rifle grenades developed and issued was so great that to devote a whole page to each would take more space than can be afforded ( in this book )...'
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old August 31st, 2003, 01:52 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 198
Major Destruction is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Hearsay only.

American troops involved in the N Africa landings used anti-tank rifle grenades fired from the Springfield rifle (from the shoulder), and destroyed at least two Somua tanks.

June 13 1944, Rendezvous with Destiny (a great resource) page 238.
Quote:
Col Chase and Cpt Mulvey crawled over to Ostrander, a rifle grenadier (with 506th PIR) "Why don't you fire at it" [a tank with the command hatch open], the Fox CO asked.
"The tank's to far away, sir and I only have a few rounds left"
"Fire anyway. I'll get you more" said the Colonel.
The first grenade bounced off the tank. Ostrander loaded again and fired. Hollywood was out-Hollywooded. The grenade dropped smack inside the tank........killing the crew.
__________________
If dogs don't go to heaven, I'd like to go where they go.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old September 13th, 2003, 09:24 AM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,081
Martin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of light
Unhappy

Here's an interesting photo : -

http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?...tem=3242335028
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Allies