|
|  |
 |
Members: 6,501
Threads: 18,474
Posts: 231,135
Online: 267
Newest Member:
nazi_akash |
|
|
| Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two |

July 30th, 2008, 09:49 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Israel
Posts: 11
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
TheRedBaron, what is your messege refered to? Is it refered to the PTRD 14, or to the "sheaf"?
__________________
In certario tu nactus juris suo!
|

July 30th, 2008, 10:01 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: An underground bunker...
Posts: 2,114
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
Multy headed grenades were first used by the Germans in WW1 and copied by the Soviets.
__________________
"Watch that Fu*ker, he'll 'ave someones eye out!" King Harold at Hastings 1066.
|

July 30th, 2008, 10:13 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 153
Salute!: 3
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRedBaron
Mate... You best not be implying that the British Infantryman was anything less than superb.
As for learning stuff... I dont think the boy who thinks the Tiger II is the best tank should throw stones....
|
ok, maby somthing a bit diffient i picked the tiger 2 because of the big gun, Panther any better? it set the basic design for the leopared 1 and 2 btw. i cant spell worth crud today dont know why.
__________________
|

July 30th, 2008, 11:24 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: An underground bunker...
Posts: 2,114
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
Quote:
Originally Posted by german mauser k98k man
ok, maby somthing a bit diffient i picked the tiger 2 because of the big gun, Panther any better? it set the basic design for the leopared 1 and 2 btw. i cant spell worth crud today dont know why.
|
The Leopards have no design heritage to the Panther other than they all have turrets and tracks.
You watch too many 'Discovery Channel' programmes.
The Leopard I owes more to the M48 than the Panther.
As for the Panther... Hmmm... Good gun... Poor engine, poor transmission, early ones had a habit of bursting into flames, armour spalling...
Face it... the Germans didnt build perfect tanks.
__________________
"Watch that Fu*ker, he'll 'ave someones eye out!" King Harold at Hastings 1066.
|

July 30th, 2008, 11:25 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 7,029
Salute!: 16
Saluted 66 Times in 58 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
The cylindrical warhead was also available as a hand grenade without the stick under the designation Handgranate 43. This cylindrical warhead could be used for other purposes: combined with a pressure-activated trigger they served as mines.
Several Handgranate 43 warheads could also be combined with a Stielhandgranate to make a large explosive grenade bundle. This combination of one Stielhandgranate 24 with 6 of the same warheads without the stick was very popular and often referred to as the " Geballte Ladung" ("forceful/big charge")  by the troops although this designation is rather colloquial and was actually semi-officially in use for an engineer weapon. The complete weapon combination looked like a flower with the grenade stick of the central Stielhandgranate as the stalk and the Hd.Gr.43 warheads surrounding it like petals (see sketch at right). It was often used as an improvised makeshift AT weapon.
Hand Grenade Handgranate
__________________
For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.
|

July 31st, 2008, 12:05 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 153
Salute!: 3
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
so the americans did? btw. the T34 was the best tank of ww2.
__________________
|

July 31st, 2008, 12:13 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: An underground bunker...
Posts: 2,114
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
Quote:
Originally Posted by german mauser k98k man
so the americans did? btw. the T34 was the best tank of ww2.
|
LOL... make ya mind up.
Why would you choose that tank?
I can think of a few problems with it but I would love to hear your arguments for it...
I would say either the Centurion, JS-III or Pershing were the better tanks as they were the last ones to arrive and therefore by definition should have been the 'best'.
Its all pointless. Its the crew that make the difference.
Just look at Hermann Bix taking on KV-1s with a 38t...
__________________
"Watch that Fu*ker, he'll 'ave someones eye out!" King Harold at Hastings 1066.
|

July 31st, 2008, 06:33 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 7,029
Salute!: 16
Saluted 66 Times in 58 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zergwraith
I think THE WEAPON was a sheaf of granades that the Soviet soldiers hand-made, and used against Wermacht tanks. All you need to do to put the tank out of action, is to throw the sheaf on the tank, mostly no matter on which part of the tank. Comparing to the american "sticky bomb", which you must to adjust to the tank's track, to put the tank out of order.
You can think that I'm writing that, only because I am russian, and I am a patriot of my nation... well, partialy yes :-), but just think about it, and compare the "sheaf" to the "sticky bomb".
Maybe some people didn't know about the even existence of such weapon, but the Soviet soldiers hand-made it. They took a few RGD granades, binded it together, and got a mortal weapon.
|
The "stickey bomb" was not an American invention but British. The 74 S.T. Grenade or "Sticky Bomb ". The US did not have a "Sticky Bomb".
Sticky bomb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
What you seem to be describing is the improvised munition featured in "Saving Private Ryan". As regards to the hand grenade you metioned there is this,
The cylindrical warhead was also available as a hand grenade without the stick under the designation Handgranate 43. This cylindrical warhead could be used for other purposes: combined with a pressure-activated trigger they served as mines.
Several Handgranate 43 warheads could also be combined with a Stielhandgranate to make a large explosive grenade bundle. This combination of one Stielhandgranate 24 with 6 of the same warheads without the stick was very popular and often referred to as the " Geballte Ladung" ("forceful/big charge")  by the troops although this designation is rather colloquial and was actually semi-officially in use for an engineer weapon. The complete weapon combination looked like a flower with the grenade stick of the central Stielhandgranate as the stalk and the Hd.Gr.43 warheads surrounding it like petals (see sketch at right). It was often used as an improvised makeshift AT weapon.
Hand Grenade Handgranate
__________________
For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.
|

July 31st, 2008, 07:08 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where Iron Crosses grow
Posts: 7,956
Salute!: 99
Saluted 81 Times in 61 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRedBaron
I would say either the Centurion, JS-III or Pershing were the better tanks as they were the last ones to arrive and therefore by definition should have been the 'best'.
|
Those tanks were complete crap as compared to the M-5 in the recconaissance job. Thinking of it, they were even worse as compared to wheeled vehicles 
__________________
"On average it took five Panthers to take out a Sherman. Four would be in a ditch out of fuel or broken down, the fifth one just blows away the Sherman before breaking down." 
|

August 20th, 2008, 08:01 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 51
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
My favorite is the ENfield and the Kar 98k
also the potato masher and the bren gun
__________________

"War does not determine who is right, only who is left"- unknown...
|

August 20th, 2008, 08:15 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where Iron Crosses grow
Posts: 7,956
Salute!: 99
Saluted 81 Times in 61 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
All completely useless as far as Naval Gunfire Support is concerned. Does this thread have any point at all?
__________________
"On average it took five Panthers to take out a Sherman. Four would be in a ditch out of fuel or broken down, the fifth one just blows away the Sherman before breaking down." 
|

August 21st, 2008, 03:17 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 7,029
Salute!: 16
Saluted 66 Times in 58 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Za Rodinu
All completely useless as far as Naval Gunfire Support is concerned. Does this thread have any point at all?
|
Not at all  LOL.
__________________
For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.
|

August 27th, 2008, 01:55 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: GB
Posts: 96
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
[quote=reddog2k;150025]I would have to say the T-34 or the Tiger.
>>The Tiger was a excellent tank with it's heavy armor, and large gun it was almost invincible in combat, but it had it's drawbacks mainly that it was difficult to produce, and the Germans were unable to support them. Many Tigers were abandoned because of mechanical failure, running out of fuel, and running out of ammunition.<<
I think the production figures were around 1200 tiger1's and 484 tiger 2's with 90 Posche tiger variants tanks reused as Elephant. The lost to breakdown and abandon figure was 70%.
>>The T-34 was the best tank during the first 2 years of the war. It's 76mm gun could fire could fire a shell at a speed of roughly 2500 feet per second twice as fast as the Panzer IV's 75mm gun could fire. The T-34s sloped armor was able to deflect most projectiles. In addition to this the T-34 was cheap and easy to produce and maintain. During production the T-34 required only one fifth the amount of steel a Panther needed.<< I Ithink the production level was about 44,000 vs around 50,000 for shermans. Though the russians also made numerous other heavy tanks and sp guns .
|

August 27th, 2008, 02:15 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: GB
Posts: 96
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
>>I think THE WEAPON was a sheaf of granades that the Soviet soldiers hand-made, and used against Wermacht tanks. All you need to do to put the tank out of action, is to throw the sheaf on the tank, mostly no matter on which part of the tank. Comparing to the american "sticky bomb", which you must to adjust to the tank's track, to put the tank out of order.
You can think that I'm writing that, only because I am russian, and I am a patriot of my nation... well, partialy yes :-), but just think about it, and compare the "sheaf" to the "sticky bomb".
Maybe some people didn't know about the even existence of such weapon, but the Soviet soldiers hand-made it. They took a few RGD granades, binded it together, and got a mortal weapon.<<
If you want a candidate for the best improvised anti tank weapon that worked so well it was retained till the 1950's the PIAT Projector Infantry Anti Tank projected a two pound bomb from an improvised projector that was more powerful than the bazooka and could project bombs to considerable distances but was originally only developed as a weapon for local defense volunteers.
It allowed the firer to fire from inside an AVF or a building as there was no flame back blast so it was more than handy in street fighting. It used a powerful spigot spring for initial launching before the charge fired.
For terifying weapons both to the enemy and the crew the Northorp projector takes some beating hundreds were built in 1940 it fired a glass projectile of phosphorpus to destroy tanks . It worked but was so dangerousit was withdrawn once the invasion was no longer likely.
|

August 27th, 2008, 09:09 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Way down under
Posts: 1,705
Salute!: 24
Saluted 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
MIke, DO you have any references for your statments. A bundle of grenades knocking out a tank? The Germans had a similar design, the panzerfaust was much mor destructive.
The question needs to be more specific, because we could argue the Aircraft was the best weapon of ww2. Capable of battling over any terrain, whether it be snow, mud or even ocean, and was capable of destorying Battleships, the heavist tanks, devastating to infantry formations, and could and did hold up entire armies such as the Germans during the Normandy Invasions.
__________________
They shall grow not old as we that are left grow old Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We shall remember them. Lest We Forget
|

August 27th, 2008, 03:13 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 7,029
Salute!: 16
Saluted 66 Times in 58 Posts
|
|
Re: The best weapon of WW2?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zergwraith
I think THE WEAPON was a sheaf of granades that the Soviet soldiers hand-made, and used against Wermacht tanks. All you need to do to put the tank out of action, is to throw the sheaf on the tank, mostly no matter on which part of the tank. Comparing to the american "sticky bomb", which you must to adjust to the tank's track, to put the tank out of order.
You can think that I'm writing that, only because I am russian, and I am a patriot of my nation... well, partialy yes :-), but just think about it, and compare the "sheaf" to the "sticky bomb".
Maybe some people didn't know about the even existence of such weapon, but the Soviet soldiers hand-made it. They took a few RGD granades, binded it together, and got a mortal weapon.
The "stickey bomb" was not an American invention but British. The 74 S.T. Grenade or "Sticky Bomb ". The US did not have a "Sticky Bomb".
Sticky bomb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
What you seem to be describing is the improvised munition featured in "Saving Private Ryan". As regards to the hand grenade you metioned there is this,
The cylindrical warhead was also available as a hand grenade without the stick under the designation Handgranate 43. This cylindrical warhead could be used for other purposes: combined with a pressure-activated trigger they served as mines.
Several Handgranate 43 warheads could also be combined with a Stielhandgranate to make a large explosive grenade bundle. This combination of one Stielhandgranate 24 with 6 of the same warheads without the stick was very popular and often referred to as the " Geballte Ladung" ("forceful/big charge")  by the troops although this designation is rather colloquial and was actually semi-officially in use for an engineer weapon. The complete weapon combination looked like a flower with the grenade stick of the central Stielhandgranate as the stalk and the Hd.Gr.43 warheads surrounding it like petals (see sketch at right). It was often used as an improvised makeshift AT weapon.
Hand Grenade Handgranate
__________________
For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:11 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |