Axis

Members: 6,501
Threads: 18,474
Posts: 231,135
Online: 279

Newest Member:
nazi_akash

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > General Discussion > Weapons in WWII
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #26 (permalink)  
Old January 4th, 2005, 06:10 PM
T. A. Gardner's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,534
Salute!: 2
Saluted 26 Times in 19 Posts
T. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of light
Post

I would add that, at least, the US got better at coordinating CAS as the NW Europe campaign went on. Initially for example US L-4 Grasshoppers did not carry aircraft radios to communicate with fighter bombers they were later equipped with these allowing a more real time response. By Nov 44 it had become common place with at least 1st and 3rd US Armies to have figher bombers on station accompanying advancing columns and have those aircraft directed on targets by L-4s and ground controllers with the columns.
I would agree in large part with Zetterling's findings where ground attack aircraft were not being directed onto targets by either ground or air controllers. On their own, it is difficult for fast ground attack aircraft to locate targets and subsequently effectively attack them.
It is also obvious that where they can, like in the case of railroads, they were very effective.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old January 5th, 2005, 08:12 PM
Mahross's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Cabinet War Rooms
Posts: 1,485
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mahross is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Here is a link to Zetterlings article:

http://web.telia.com/~u18313395/norm...s/article.html

Its good but is effective outlining what Ian Gooderson argued in his book. While it is true not many tanks were destroyed allied aircraft, especially the typhoon, had a certain morale effect similar in away to what the Tiger tank had on allied tank men. This is someting significant missed int he historiography.

It is true that in the CAS role it was very hard to pinpoint a stationary target but a moving one was easier. The best use for the aircraft was in the Battlefield Interdiction Role i.e. stopping the reinforcements and supplies reacginh the frontline. by the time of normandy the allied TAF were effectivly able to cordon the area off and seriously hinder the movement of german forces into the battle zone. This was probably their most significant contribution to the campaign.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old January 15th, 2005, 04:22 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: utah
Posts: 918
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
chromeboomerang is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Well, ran across this little bit of data from a book titled aircraft of ww2 by Jim Winchester.

The FW 190 could also carry a bomb called the sc1000, which weighed 3.968 lbs. " The " largest & most powerful bomb carried by any fighter of the war.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Allies