|
|  |
 |
Members: 6,501
Threads: 18,474
Posts: 231,135
Online: 280
Newest Member:
nazi_akash |
|
|
| Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two |

February 29th, 2004, 06:18 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,572
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Maybe some of the weapons"experts" here might help.In general,what kind of force did the Stalin organ have?I,m aware we had a version as well as the Germans.From what I read everyone feared them.Is it like a mortar round[or more powerful]?Penetrate armor?What about range? 
__________________
|

February 29th, 2004, 07:44 PM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,224
Salute!: 15
Saluted 45 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
|
The Russian 'Katyusha' and German 'Nebelwerfer' both entered service about a month apart. They are basically referred to as 'rocket artillery'.
The Katyusha came in 82, 132 and 300mm sizes, the Nebelwerfer in 150, 210, 280 and 300mm. Warhead weight varied but was usually in the region of 22kg HE. Range was around 5km. The rocket shells had quite thin casings and relied on blast to create a shock-effect.
Armour-piercing rounds were not used as the weapon could not be accurately aimed ; the idea was to 'saturate' a defended area ,usually immediately prior to an infantry assault.
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

February 29th, 2004, 10:52 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,534
Salute!: 2
Saluted 26 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
For the Soviet flavors:
82mm 1kg propellant (black powder), 3.05 kg explosive filler, overall weight 8kg. Range was about 5 km depending on weather.
132mm 7.08kg propellant, 18.5 kg explosive filler, overall weight 42.5 kg. Range about 8.5 km.
300mm 72kg overall weight range about 2.8 km. Fired from a fixed frame launcher.
310mm An improved 300mm rocket replacing it in 1944. 92.5 kg weight 4.8 km range or 94.6 kg and 4.5 km range.
All of these were high explosive only, unlike their German equivalents which could have HE, smoke or, incendiary warheads depending on model.
|

March 1st, 2004, 09:06 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Citizen of the world, though quite misantropic!
Posts: 6,393
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
My grandfather has told me about the dreaded Katyushas, that were incredibly inaccurate. There was a lot of noise, smoke, many explosions but little damage, because they rarely hit something, but when they did...  they had really terrible effects.
__________________
"War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." - Jean Dutourd, French veteran of both world wars
"A mon fils: depuis que tes yeux sont fermes les miens n’ont cessé de pleurir." - Mère française, Verdun
|

March 2nd, 2004, 11:53 AM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,877
Salute!: 104
Saluted 35 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Terrible weapons and truly effective in creating havoc!
I just remember reading about the 1941 Barbarossa campaign how Germans had trouble in some cities with Russian defence. Other measures would not work but a barrage by Nebelwerfers always worked. I know it was the same with Katjushas...

__________________
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:23 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |