Axis

Members: 5,680
Threads: 17,395
Posts: 216,755
Online: 289

Newest Member:
rwelch1874

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > General Discussion > Weapons in WWII
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old January 17th, 2005, 01:45 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: utah
Posts: 918
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
chromeboomerang is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

The Corsair could outturn,outclimb, & outroll the Mustang. Could also take more battle damage. Later versions were as fast or faster than Mustang, more heavily armed to boot. Why then was it not considered a better plane than the mustang?

Eric Brown did not consider it to be at top of his list. Wonder if any US flyers flew both & had any comments to make. Anybody know?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old January 17th, 2005, 12:58 PM
TA152's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,028
Salute!: 11
Saluted 7 Times in 4 Posts
TA152 is a jewel in the roughTA152 is a jewel in the roughTA152 is a jewel in the roughTA152 is a jewel in the roughTA152 is a jewel in the rough
Post

I think the early Corsair got off to a bad start because it was supposed to be a carrier plane and the Navy pawned it off to the Marines because the visiablity was too poor to operate off carriers until modifications were made to it. By then the Hellcat was established.

In the Korean War the Corsair did well off carriers but it had many changes made to it by then such as going from a three blade prop to a four blade with bigger engine, a blown clear canopy instead of a birdcage type and I think they made the pilots seat so you could raise and lower it during landings and take offs to improve visiblity.

Anouther reason I can think of is that the Pacific theatre was second fiddle to the European theatre as far as the press and leaders were concerned and the Corsair was not used much in Europe so it got less press and public relations. As they say "image is everything". ( I don't agree but the press does ). Anouther press issue I can think of is more aces were in Mustangs so they got more public relations than the Corsair pilots. If you were around in the 1970's there was a TV show called "Black Sheep Squadon" and then the Corsair got more publicity than the P-51.

I can also think of more North American press advertisments on their products than I can for ChanceVoight. If you look at WWII issues of Nationl Geographic you can see this really well.

The Corsair was an excellent aircraft but you have to advertise your greatness.
__________________
Work Harder ! Millions on welfare are depending on you.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old January 17th, 2005, 07:11 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: utah
Posts: 918
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
chromeboomerang is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Good points. this topic was covered at another site. One person mentioned that the Corsair even had better range than the Mustang. The Mustang was a great plane, but I think a bit overrated.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Allies