Axis

Members: 6,450
Threads: 18,400
Posts: 230,105
Online: 256

Newest Member:
jrhess3

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > General Discussion > Weapons in WWII
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old May 8th, 2007, 07:36 PM
FLOZi's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wakefield, Yorkshire, England
Posts: 30
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
FLOZi is an unknown quantity at this point
Default OQF 75mm vs M3 75mm

Hello folks, long time since i popped in here.

I know the OQF 75mm was a bored-out 6pdr firing US ammunition (with the HE filler removed), I was wondering how much the performance differed with the standard US M3 as used in the Sherman, and which particular rounds were issued.

wikipedia suggests that the OQF was longer, and therefore with a greater MV and penetration. As well as:

Quote:
A much improved anti tank shell was developed. This was a APCBC (Armour Piercing Capped, Ballistic Cap) shot design. It had a muzzle velocity of 2,600 ft/s (790 m/s) as opposed to 2,030 ft/s (620 m/s) for the older M61 APC shell. US documents1 showed the round as available for both the M3 75 mm and ROQF 75 mm. Other sources2 indicate the shell saw use by the British only. The performance of the new shell was a vast increase: penetrating 102 mm at 500 yards (460 m) at 30 degree angle of impact. Actual availability and usage of this round is unclear. According to some British tables M72 AP had a penetration performance of 114 mm at 100 yards and 102 mm at 500 yards, so it is possible the 30 degrees angle of impact is a transposition error for 0 degrees. This is interesting as US M72 has a penetration performance of 101 mm at 100 yards.
Obviously, wikipedia is never the most reliable of sources, and I was wondering (hoping) if anyone here knew any better.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old May 13th, 2007, 02:46 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 274
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tony Williams has a spectacular aura aboutTony Williams has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: OQF 75mm vs M3 75mm

The British 75mm was actually a couple of inches or so shorter than the US M3 (although longer than the M2) but the difference was too small to matter.

No 75mm made 2,600 fps - the figure is around 2,030 fps. Penetration was around 70mm/500 yards/30 degrees.
__________________
Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old May 15th, 2007, 02:19 AM
FLOZi's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wakefield, Yorkshire, England
Posts: 30
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
FLOZi is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: OQF 75mm vs M3 75mm

Thanks for confirming Tony - both here and Tank-Net.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
German 75mm L/70 Martin Bull Weapons in WWII 27 August 1st, 2002 09:07 AM


Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Allies