|
|  |
 |
Members: 6,450
Threads: 18,400
Posts: 230,098
Online: 342
Newest Member:
jrhess3 |
|
|
| Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two |

June 13th, 2007, 07:27 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,019
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Type XI hoax.....
I was just wondering if anybody had heard of the supposed find of a Type XI U-Boat that had been found...Again, this has probably been discussed on the forum time and again; however, no search returns any thread started about "Type XI," so, here goes. The story is here: www.uboatwar.net/XI.htm I wonder how the marine company that is reported to have found a boat "w/turrets" can boast such a claim when all records at the U-Boat Archive in Cuxhaven-Altenbruch claim otherwise. Could such construction of these boats been so super-secret that no records would have existed?
|

June 13th, 2007, 07:37 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,019
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
Interesting information on Types here: http://www.sharkhunters.com/typeadditional.htm
Can anyone find a picture of what the type would have looked like with the Arado seaplane hanger?
|

June 13th, 2007, 07:42 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where Iron Crosses grow
Posts: 7,849
Salute!: 93
Saluted 75 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
Well, there is no type XI mentioned in Uboat.net ...
http://uboat.net/types/index.html
__________________
"On average it took five Panthers to take out a Sherman. Four would be in a ditch out of fuel or broken down, the fifth one just blows away the Sherman before breaking down." 
|

June 13th, 2007, 07:52 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,019
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Za Rodinu
|
Look a litttttle closer: www.uboat.net/maps/us_east_coast.htm
Still, with all the prestige that uboat.net has regarding German submarine information my historian mentality would have me remain open to other possibilities.
|

June 13th, 2007, 11:52 PM
|
 |
Alte Hase 
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,716
Salute!: 21
Saluted 28 Times in 23 Posts
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
be careful with any info from sharkhunters............
|

June 14th, 2007, 12:21 AM
|
|
Dishonorably Discharged
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 91
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
I believe I've seen that recently, maybe in an Encyclopeadia of Weapons of WW2?
If I recall correctly, it was on inter-war designs proposed but never built, during the inter-war theory by many navies of turreted submarines like the French Surcouf?
The Type 21 did have turrets but only for AA mounts and they were sleakly designed to minimize wake resistance under-water.
I've seen designs in books, not just suspect stuff on web, of plans for 6", 8" even battleship lone gun on a sub, so the sub would be more like a pop-up giant pistol that like a sling-shot would have to point her bow at each target.
But apparently the 'turret submarines' fell by the wayside for the most part.
|

June 14th, 2007, 01:27 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,019
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Balderdasher
I believe I've seen that recently, maybe in an Encyclopeadia of Weapons of WW2?
The Type 21 did have turrets but only for AA mounts and they were sleakly designed to minimize wake resistance under-water.
|
Yeah, I got the thread idea from Encyclopedia of Weapons of World War II.
And, just to make sure we're on the same footing here, we're talking about the Type XI not the Type XXI.
The following is another interesting article on the Type: http://www.geocities.com/lief99/U-boats_u-cruiser.html
If the Type IX and Type X took considerably more time to dive than the Type VII, which was a serious consideration when crews had a choice on which one to serve, I can't help but wonder how much longer the turreted beast would have taken.
The following is taken from http://www.rense.com/general56/supsec.htm and can be found just below the boats specifications (if you want to go straight there) with the remainder of the argument FOR the existence of the Type XI.
"Very little is known about the Type XI-B U-Boat. All official histories state that the vessel type was never built and numerous publications indicate that the Type XI-B submarine design went only as far as a preliminary 'keel laying' at the building yards of Deschimag -A.G. Weser in Bremen, Germany. However, there is a subtle hint that at least one vessel of this type was indeed launched from the Deschimag yards. Contained within the records of the Military archive at Freiburgim-Breisgau, Germany is a brief mention of the "actual" yard trials in the Weser River of the Type XI U-Cruiser having attained a surface speed of 26 knots. [. . .] The details contained in the records of the Military archive in Germany makes it very clear that the above speed trials were not obtained from 'tank' tests of models. Therefore, there certainly is [s]ome proof of the actual existence of a working and operational model of the legendary Type XI."
Again, the majority of arguments I've found on the net claim that no Type XI boat ever made it beyond the laying of the keel. The above is one of the more believable possibilities I've found beyond the unsubstantiated claims made by the marine recovery company of a "discovered" Type XI.
|

June 14th, 2007, 01:55 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,019
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
I'm still yet to find any pictures of the seaplane hanger installation on a Type XI. However I found that the intended aircraft was to be the Arado Ar 231.....
From Wikipedia: "The Arado Ar 231 was a light-weight seaplane developed during World War II in Germany as a scout plane for submarines. The need to be stored inside the submarine necessitated compromises in design that left the single-seat seaplane of little practical use. Testing soon discovered them to be fragile, underpowered, and difficult to fly even during calm weather, and as a result, development ended in favour of the Focke Achgelis Fa 330 autogyro."
|

June 14th, 2007, 08:15 AM
|
|
Dishonorably Discharged
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 91
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
I've got a ww2 video series somewhere here that has actual footage of German timing of launch and retrieval of one of those auto-gyros on a tether however, like a 'super-kite' taking a peek over the horizon. But it skips. Reminds me of that James Bond movie in Japan, "Little Nelly" lol.
|

June 15th, 2007, 03:15 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,019
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Balderdasher
I've got a ww2 video series somewhere here that has actual footage of German timing of launch and retrieval of one of those auto-gyros on a tether however, like a 'super-kite' taking a peek over the horizon.
|
I'd like to see that. In the meantime here are some pictures of the Focke-Achgelis Fa 330A-1 on board a U-boat...
...in storage...
...tail assembly...
...rotor assembly...
...additional information on this platform: Choppers in WWII

|

June 15th, 2007, 04:49 AM
|
|
Dishonorably Discharged
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 91
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
In "The Complete Encyclopedia of Weapons of World War II" Bishop
P439
"Planned at a time when the larger cruiser submarine idea was still in vogue, only three Type XI were built, due to changined piroirties. With a lenght of 115m(337ft), the fourt boats (U-112-115) would have had a range of 25430 km(15800mi) at 12 kts. Their armament included four 127-mm guns and an autogyro was carried.
There is a coloured drawing.
|

June 23rd, 2007, 08:47 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,019
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
Just found this neat photo and story... www.combatsim.com/htm/feb99/typexi-2.htm
|

June 23rd, 2007, 08:50 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,019
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
screwed up here somewhere...
|

June 23rd, 2007, 08:51 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mississippi Gulf Coast, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,019
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
Again, another pic...
|

December 3rd, 2007, 11:19 AM
|
|
recruit
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
help what kind of seaplane is this...
|

December 3rd, 2007, 01:46 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 2,653
Salute!: 17
Saluted 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: help what kind of seaplane is this...
i don't know as the pic is not there!
|

December 3rd, 2007, 03:19 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Windsor UK
Posts: 991
Salute!: 0
Saluted 11 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: help what kind of seaplane is this...
Type XI U-boat.
Series Numbers - U 112 - U115.
Years ordered/completed - 1939 - ....
Displacement - surfaced 3,140 - submerged 3,630.
Dimentions - 377ft 3in x 31ft 3in x 20ft 3in (114.9m x 9.5m x 6.1m)
Machinery - surfaced 8D - submerged 2E on two shafts.
HP - surfaced 17,600 - submerged 2,200.
Speed (knots) - surfaced 23.2 -submerged 7.
Range (miles) - surfaced 20,600-10 knots - submerged 10/50-4 knots.
Fuel load (tons) - 500.
Complement 110.
Armament - Six 21in (533mm) torpedo tubes, four forward, two aft. Four 5in (127mm) deck guns (2x2) one 37mm one 20mm.
1937 -38 design derived from WWI cruiser submarine. twin cylinder side by side OO perssure hull. Construction never begun.
Submarines of World War Two. Erminio Bagnasco.
|

February 5th, 2008, 02:40 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Collado Villalba, Madrid, ESPAÑA (SPAIN)
Posts: 401
Salute!: 2
Saluted 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
Dear friend:
As you seen in http://www.u-historia.com/ > Técnica > Proyectos > Tipo XI, these U-Boats not arrived at the serial production in the WWII. Are very complex and very cost.
I remind you the use of translators online if necessary.....
Jan.
|

February 6th, 2008, 02:35 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Reston, Virginia
Posts: 138
Salute!: 0
Saluted 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
According to Rossler's The U-Boat (the same reference cited in the drawing of the Type XI's aircraft hangar in one of the posts above), the plane was an Arado Ar 231.
|

May 15th, 2008, 12:58 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Collado Villalba, Madrid, ESPAÑA (SPAIN)
Posts: 401
Salute!: 2
Saluted 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Type XI hoax.....
A croquis drawing schematic is in this pages: http://xoomer.alice.it/bk/NWS/Kriegs..._Boote_XIb.jpg
-is a big image- 975 KB and 1357x1400 px
Jan.
Jan.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:36 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|