|
|  |
 |
Members: 3,719
Threads: 14,489
Posts: 180,700
Online: 279
Newest Member:
pony9a |
|
|
| Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two |

March 16th, 2008, 07:38 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
Thinking about this subject and the maintenance of them it must have added to the supply and repair headaches presented by the types and ages of the vehicles.
__________________
 For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
|

March 21st, 2008, 05:00 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
"The French FT-17 light tank was undoubtedly the most common
foreign vehicle in Japanese service. A fair number of these vehicles
were purchased from the French outright, and the Japanese built an
unspecified number of illegal copies. Other FT-17s were captured from
the Chinese. Many of the FT-17s in Japan's inventory were modified for
the peculiar needs of the China/Manchuria operations then being
executed by the Imperial Japanese Army. These included flamethrower
tanks, smoke laying vehicles, and chemical projection devices. Of
course, the traditional FT-17 (male and female variants) were also
widely used. At least one company, Hasegawa, briefly produced a
series of Japanese FT-17 variants in 1/72 scale. I am not aware if they
are still in production."
Home
__________________
 For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
|

March 23rd, 2008, 09:50 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
"Many of the FT-17s in Japan's inventory were modified for
the peculiar needs of the China/Manchuria operations then being
executed by the Imperial Japanese Army."
Does anyone know what the modifications were and why?
__________________
 For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
|

March 24th, 2008, 04:03 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
I had also forgot Belgium had FT-17s in thier inventory.
__________________
 For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
|

March 28th, 2008, 05:32 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
World War II
Although by then completely obsolete, the FT-17 tanks were still used by France, Poland, Germany and Finland during the Second World War.
When the Second World War started, the infantry support role was still a major part of the French tank doctrine and tanks were distributed throughout the army in small penny-packets Being intended for an infantry support role, they had very few AP rounds, only enough to defend themselves against enemy tanks, the vast majority being HE rounds. It was intended to have completly replaced the Renault FT-17 tanks with modern Renault R-35 or R-40 tanks by 1940. However insuficient modern tanks had been built so one thousand F-17s went to war in the same role as they had a generation earlier. Their survieability was much lower as they made easy targets for German panzers and specilist anti-tank guns as well the field artillery and when these were unavailable, such as at the crossing of the Meuse, they even fell foul of hollow-charge equipped combat engineers.
The American army's first contact with an enemy tank in WW2 was with the FT-17. During the 1942 landings in North Africa the Vichy French forces advanced with seven FT-17s supported by infantry. These were repulsed by three Stuart light tanks under the command of General George Patton. The Americans destroyed three FT-17s without loss.
Their final use in combat was in 1944 when the Germans used them in the street fighting in Paris.
Renault FT-17 and FT-31 - Keiths Guide to Wargaming the French Army of 1940 (in 10mm / 12mm / N-Gauge)
__________________
 For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
|

March 29th, 2008, 06:18 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
I've read now that the Philippine Army used a FT-17 for traning up untill 1940. I wonder what happened to it and if it was used in combat in 41.
__________________
 For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
|

March 29th, 2008, 05:42 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
And it looks like Siam/Thailand and the French used FT-17s against eachother in 1941.
__________________
 For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
|

April 3rd, 2008, 12:17 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 55
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCFalkenbergIII
Also Canada bought a large batch of Renault FT's and a few Mark VIII heavies from the US in 1940 and used them for training.
|
Might have been part of the Lend-Lease program.
|

April 11th, 2008, 02:21 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
Im not sure of if they were. Ill have to look that up. Anyone else know if they were?
__________________
 For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
|

April 11th, 2008, 07:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 21
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fallschirmjaeger
Might have been part of the Lend-Lease program.
|
Canada did not take part in the Lend-Lease program.
|

April 19th, 2008, 05:03 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
Quote:
Originally Posted by wlee15
Canada did not take part in the Lend-Lease program.
|
From what I have found that is true.
"Lend-Lease, an Act of the US Congress passed March 1941, providing for the transfer of American war materials to Britain and its allies in return for theoretical deferred payment. Canada's involvement in WORLD WAR II had caused serious deterioration in the BALANCE OF PAYMENTS vis-à-vis the US, and the Lend-Lease Act threatened to divert all British war orders from Canada to the US.
To avert a crisis, on April 20 Prime Minister Mackenzie King and President F.D. Roosevelt issued the Hyde Park Declaration, named for the latter's Hyde Park estate, where they met, providing for American war purchases in Canada. American-produced components of war materiel manufactured in Canada for Britain were to be included in the Lend-Lease scheme, an arrangement which alleviated Canada's trade deficit and made it easier for Canada to fill British orders and guarantee financing for them. Lend-Lease, terminated August 1945, greatly helped the war efforts of Britain, the USSR and some other Allied powers; it benefited Canada only indirectly."
Lend-Lease
__________________
 For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
|

April 19th, 2008, 09:09 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: A million miles away from...something a million miles away.
Posts: 1,731
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
Err, Fallschirmjaeger, Canada just bought the vehicles before Lend-Lease was implemented.
They needed them for training.
__________________
"One might as well try to charge at a wall."-Napoleon, regarding the British Infantry.
|

April 28th, 2008, 12:00 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
Makes total sense to me. They were purchased before the US entered the war.
__________________
 For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
|

April 28th, 2008, 12:24 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 2,823
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe
Err, Fallschirmjaeger, Canada just bought the vehicles before Lend-Lease was implemented.
They needed them for training.
|
This is true. The US military had them trucked to the Canadian border where Canadian crews had to drive them into Canada and then load them onto Canadian trucks. Then current US law prohibited the delivery of these vehicles (designated as "scrap") directly to the Canadians.
__________________
Truth is stranger than bullshit!
|

April 28th, 2008, 08:16 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
Well with the age of the tanks I guess that technically they could have been "scrap"  . Could have called them "tractors" too LOL.
__________________
 For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
Last edited by JCFalkenbergIII; May 6th, 2008 at 01:27 AM.
|

May 6th, 2008, 01:57 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
IIRC the Turks had some FT-17s too.
__________________
 For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
|

May 15th, 2008, 01:59 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Re: WWI Tanks in WWII
Does anyone know what happened to the FT-17 that was used in the Philippines in 1940 that was used for training?
__________________
 For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:43 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |