|
|  |
 |
Members: 4,296
Threads: 15,279
Posts: 191,258
Online: 154
Newest Member:
Powder |
|
|
| Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two |

April 2nd, 2008, 04:37 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nord
Posts: 508
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaeger
The MP-40 and Mauser was used but quickly replaced with US equipment, to be changed back to German equipment again in the 60ies.
The MG-3 is a continuation of the MG-42 that is used by several services today. It is a marvoulus gun, but less effective in attack. (the main drawback for any GPMG)
|
Yes.... my bad..... should have been MG-3 not G-3 which I have fired with a scope.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lt Fox
Wasn't the G-3 a model made from the G43?
|
Designers from Mauser extended from the StG assault rifle series. The G-3, FN, L1A1, and CETME are all cousins.
The point of modern weapons in comparison is that the early designs were in many cases modified from those in Germany in WWII.
__________________
Coir a glaive
Nemo me impune lacessit
|

April 3rd, 2008, 12:12 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 55
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Depends:
Quality: Germans
Quantity: Russians
|

April 3rd, 2008, 01:06 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,344
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fallschirmjaeger
Depends:
Quality: Germans
Quantity: Russians
|
Russians deserve more then then just quantity
And the German "quality", is only good on paper..... in reality, reliability comes in question.....
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler
|

April 3rd, 2008, 06:00 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 700
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Quality or quantity... who are these guys that set forth such idiotic maxims???
So the German made and mass produced Mauser is of better quality than the Russian Mosin Nagant? Or the Lee Enfield? Why? Because it is German?
The fact is that they are quite similar. As is the rest of the products. Well almost.
For me a quality product is something that I can use for years and years, and hand over to my sons when the time comes.
So the equipment that is prone to breakdown has little quality to me. In short the Russian equipment is of good quality. The long service lenght of some of this kit goes a long way to prove my point.
__________________
'We march. The enemy is retreating in transport. We follow on foot.' Lt.Neil McCallum 5/7 Gordons 19th November 1942
|

April 3rd, 2008, 07:48 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 269
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
The Russians generally took the view that the optimum military weapon was one which was made just well enough to do its job reliably, and to last as long as it needed to. To spend more time and effort than that was basically a waste of resources which could be better employed doing something else.
So the T-34 had a very rough finish, because a finer one would carried no practical advantage. Similarly, even into the 1950s their aircraft cannon lasted for only about 3,000 rounds, because in combat very few guns fired even 1,000 rounds before being destroyed.
__________________
Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website
|

April 3rd, 2008, 08:26 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 5,933
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaeger
Quality or quantity... who are these guys that set forth such idiotic maxims???
|
Brilliant, isn't it? 
|

April 3rd, 2008, 10:46 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 700
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Now who makes the most shiny weapons? Or he ones with the really kewl names?
This thread will continnue, then burn out, only to be lit again around June when we all are pretty damn tired of lawnmoving...
__________________
'We march. The enemy is retreating in transport. We follow on foot.' Lt.Neil McCallum 5/7 Gordons 19th November 1942
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |