|
|  |
 |
Members: 6,450
Threads: 18,400
Posts: 230,105
Online: 263
Newest Member:
jrhess3 |
|
|
| Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two |

August 6th, 2008, 09:39 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
blah
__________________
German Stuff is freakin sweet!!!
|

August 6th, 2008, 11:17 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Britannia
Posts: 2,362
Salute!: 31
Saluted 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
By "Blah", what do you mean?
|

August 6th, 2008, 11:21 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 6,930
Salute!: 16
Saluted 64 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
LOL The depth! The insight! The grasp of information and nuance !! All in on word!!! 
__________________
For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.
|

August 7th, 2008, 12:05 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where Iron Crosses grow
Posts: 7,849
Salute!: 93
Saluted 75 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
That blah and the intelligent signature have earned Tiger29 the Order of the Red Flame 
__________________
"On average it took five Panthers to take out a Sherman. Four would be in a ditch out of fuel or broken down, the fifth one just blows away the Sherman before breaking down." 
|

August 7th, 2008, 01:14 PM
|
|
Dishonorably Discharged
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Indianapolis, Ind. USA
Posts: 476
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Hey ive fired Actual weapons in combat LOL and for my money the slingshot reigns supreme
|

August 20th, 2008, 11:27 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Britannia
Posts: 2,362
Salute!: 31
Saluted 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
I disssagree Mortmann. The spikey club beats all.
|

August 20th, 2008, 04:16 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 51
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
I just want to say that the Germans shredded the Russians but were shredded back by hundreds of Russians- I would say like 20 to 1
__________________

"War does not determine who is right, only who is left"- unknown...
|

August 20th, 2008, 07:16 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,504
Salute!: 3
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Quote:
Originally Posted by War Hawk Sniper
I just want to say that the Germans shredded the Russians but were shredded back by hundreds of Russians- I would say like 20 to 1
|
I just want to say that no such shredding occured.
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler
|

August 20th, 2008, 07:25 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where Iron Crosses grow
Posts: 7,849
Salute!: 93
Saluted 75 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
What an intelligent post, War Hawk Sniper (a War Hawk Sniper being exactly what?). What facts do you have to support that ineffable view? Remember I said facts, not BS opinions. Please.
__________________
"On average it took five Panthers to take out a Sherman. Four would be in a ditch out of fuel or broken down, the fifth one just blows away the Sherman before breaking down." 
|

August 20th, 2008, 07:42 PM
|
 |
Good Ol' Boy 
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Deep in the Heart of Dixie
Posts: 5,327
Salute!: 51
Saluted 48 Times in 41 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe
I disssagree Mortmann. The spikey club beats all.
|
Yeah, I like the spikey club, too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by War Hawk Sniper
I just want to say that the Germans shredded the Russians but were shredded back by hundreds of Russians- I would say like 20 to 1
|
You'll need to cough up some supporting data to back that bold statement.
__________________
Best Regards,
JW
Flag of the State of Alabama
|

August 20th, 2008, 08:42 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NEPA/Scranton(close enough)
Posts: 1,244
Salute!: 46
Saluted 33 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe
I disssagree Mortmann. The spikey club beats all.
|
Problem with a spikey club is that it takes too long to manufacture. Thats why I prefer the pointy stick. Easy to use, and they are lying on the ground everywhere there is vegetationGermany
Quote:
Originally Posted by War Hawk Sniper
I just want to say that the Germans shredded the Russians but were shredded back by hundreds of Russians- I would say like 20 to 1
|
Strength of the opposing forces on the Soviet Western border. June 22, 1941
Germany and Allies
Divisions166
Personnel4,306,800
Guns and mortars42,601
Tanks (incl assault guns)
4,171
Aircraft 4389
Soviet Union:
Divisions 190
Guns and mortars 59,787
Tanks (incl assault guns) 15,687
Aircraft 11, 537
Source: Mikhail Meltyukhov “Stalin's Missed Chance” table 47
At Kursk the forces where
Germany:
2,700 tanks
800,000 infantry
2,109 aircraft
Soviets:
3,600 tanks
20,000 guns
1,300,000 infantry and supporting troops
2,792 aircraft
This is from Wikipedia. sometimes incorrect but these numbers are generaly on par from what i've seen elswhere.
Note: I know Kursk was a defensive battle but the Soviets knew it was coming and still didn't build up to 20:1 ratio.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloniksp
I just want to say that no such shredding occurred.
|
Right. You cant blame the failure of a few leaders on the perceived greatness of Nazi Germany
(perceived: not real)
__________________
"Like so many of our people, we have now had a personal experience of German barbarity which only strengthens the resolution of all of us to fight through to final victory."-King George VI
"Casualties many; Percentage of dead not known; Combat efficiency; we are winning."-Colonel David M. Shoup-Saipan
Last edited by mikebatzel; August 20th, 2008 at 09:28 PM.
|

August 20th, 2008, 09:20 PM
|
 |
Good Ol' Boy 
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Deep in the Heart of Dixie
Posts: 5,327
Salute!: 51
Saluted 48 Times in 41 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikebatzel
Problem with a spikey club is that it takes too long to manufacture. Thats why I prefer the pointy stick. Easy to use, and they are lying on the ground everywhere there is vegetation
|
yeah, but the pointy stick is too delicate. There's nothing like the manly thud of heavy timber combined with the shuthunk of a spike as it connects with one of the bad guys.
__________________
Best Regards,
JW
Flag of the State of Alabama
|

August 20th, 2008, 09:38 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NEPA/Scranton(close enough)
Posts: 1,244
Salute!: 46
Saluted 33 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Jeff, watch 10000 BC. How many things are killed by picking up the closest pointy stick. I mean, we all know Hollywood would NEVER deceive us.
Although you did strike home. I do miss that distinct shuthunk of a spiked club.
__________________
"Like so many of our people, we have now had a personal experience of German barbarity which only strengthens the resolution of all of us to fight through to final victory."-King George VI
"Casualties many; Percentage of dead not known; Combat efficiency; we are winning."-Colonel David M. Shoup-Saipan
|

August 22nd, 2008, 12:38 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Britannia
Posts: 2,362
Salute!: 31
Saluted 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloniksp
I just want to say that no such shredding occured.
|
Oh, didn't you know about the Shredder Mk I? A beastly weapon. In the end the Soviets copied it. Here is an actual photgraph of the weapon.

|

August 22nd, 2008, 02:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 25
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
During the Battle For Berlin the Soviets outnumbered the Germans five to one in men and tanks and fifteen to one in guns.
source: Battle for Berlin
|

August 25th, 2008, 01:39 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: GB
Posts: 96
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
>>The russian anti tank rifle was called the PTRS, and was very effective in ambushing Panzers. Anti tankn guns were also good at this. I read about one soldier in stalingrad who used the anti tank rifle to snipe. He even added a scope.<<
The Russians used them as sniping weapons regularly even in Korea they were used by the Chinese. They were used into the Berlin battles as a support weapon engaging support weapons with a PTDR would be the usual method the bullets penetration was such that brick walls and wood wouldn't stop it easily.
The Russians also lacked effective infantry anti tank weapons. They did use some Bazooka's on lend lease but they did not recieve any Piat's from Britain. They used various anti tank grenades many were very effective.
|

August 25th, 2008, 01:47 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: GB
Posts: 96
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
>>Having fired the Mp40, PPSh 41 and PPS43 under reasonably rigerous conditions my vote goes for the PPSh 41. I fired a weapon that spent 40 years in a bog, was dug out, cleaned up and had no problems emptying several mag's under pretty serious weather conditions (-15 degrees C without wind chill). When I fired an MP40 in the UK in spring it jammed several times, easy to clear but still a pain in the backside, the PPS43 was similar (in fact, I think I may be the only person in history to break one by cocking it too hard).<<
The Russian weapons were designed to be more forgiving including a layer of chrome inside the barrel to allow them to avoid corrosion. The Germans rate the russian heavy machine guns 12.7mm and 14.5mm and smg's highly were rather dismissive of their LMG's raifles and maxims. That was the opinion of my father in law and he survived two years on the eastern front.
They also admired some of the Russian Mortars and heavy guns especially the 76mm guns.
|

August 25th, 2008, 01:55 AM
|
 |
Good Ol' Boy 
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Deep in the Heart of Dixie
Posts: 5,327
Salute!: 51
Saluted 48 Times in 41 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Mike, read my PM to you, please.
__________________
Best Regards,
JW
Flag of the State of Alabama
|

August 25th, 2008, 03:18 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,527
Salute!: 2
Saluted 24 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian vs German Infantry Weapons
Just to throw a curve into this somewhat tedious thread:
The US 60mm mortar had no equal in WW 2 (yes, the French used the original Brandt version that is essentially identical). This infantry weapon gives US units a big firepower advantage over German ones.
In a German company there is no equivalent. While both the US and German company have rifles, machineguns, etc., only the US has mortars available, and an effective mortar to boot. The 60 will throw a bomb over 1000 yards. Its bomb is quite effective for its size having about double the blast and fragmentation of the smaller 50mm types many countries adopted.
When you couple that with a crude indirect fire capacity and the presence of radios and telephones in a US company these mortars form a fire base that cannot be countered by resources at the same level on the German side. This means that the US can engage German machinegun teams with mortar fire and the Germans can do nothing to respond.
| |