What do you think about the Jadgpanther heavy tank destroyer?
Wikipedia.org and other resources claim it is considered the best tank destroyer of WW2.
It's great combination of firepower, good armor and mobility made it a very effective tank killer.
In one encouner 3 Jagdpanthers destroyed 11 Churchill tanks in 2 minutes, before 2 of them suffered track damage and the third retreated. Cool stuff.

Do you guys have any information on it? Can't find much about it.

Just use the search function and you´ll find lots of info here...for instance..

Jagdpanther vs Churchills

__________________

Not for the crews of the Churchills. From your comments, thankfully you haven't seen what happens to tank crew when a vehicle brews up. WW2 wasn't a video game...

__________________
Paul Reed
Webmaster - Battlefields of WW2- www.ww2battlefields.com

Easy there. I only meant it's an impressive machine.

Ok, but let's get our language in perspective when we talk about these things.

__________________
Paul Reed
Webmaster - Battlefields of WW2- www.ww2battlefields.com

the assault gun concept was never used as widely by the Germans as regular turreted tanks, even though some photos from that era might give one the impression they were all over the battlefield. The Jagdpanther was certainly good for its intended use - it was good on the defense as its main advantage, as well as its biggest weakness over the standard panther was the absence of a turret - this made for a less complex tank and a lower silhouette. After Kursk the Germans spent alot of time on the defense.

Alot of these assault guns (besides Jagdpanther there were several other types notably the Sturmgeshutz III) were either regular Panthers that had turret trouble or damage and were simply converted over, or were obsolete models like the PVKW III that had too light armor but were still useful in the assault gun role.

You see many pictures of these self-propelled (or assault) guns, some were used as self propelled artillery at times, but like i said the Germans never had very many. Most of the pictures are from late in the war (post Stalingrad) when the Germans were using every piece of armor that would still function. Also note the relative scarcity of this type of tank in modern armies, this was a concept that was viable for a few years in world war 2 until its disadvantages (no turret) made it too obsolete.
(The US Army today has the M-109, which in appearance is very similar to a WW2 assault gun. But it is basically just self-propelled artillery and is not really intended to take on a tank. Moreover its armor would not stop anything greater than a 50 caliber machine gun, if that.)

There weren't that many assault guns? The Germans used over 10,635 various marks of the Stug III and StuH 42 from 1940-1945 along with 1,141 Stug IV.

__________________


For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.

Actually, the Assault gun total production was a major issue. Especially with the introduction of the Hetzer wich would produce a vehicle with good overall protection, a gun that packed a mean punch and which a very low silhouette. Now, join this with a simplicity and you have a planed 1000 units a month.
As JC stated, the total assault gun production was 10,550 + 1,212 StuH42 + 90 ferdinands + 2,584 Hetzer + 769 Jgpz IV + 930 PzIV/70(A) + 278 PzIV/70(V)+392 JagdPanther + 77 JagdTiger for a grand total of 16,882 assorted assault guns.

The total production of German tanks was 26,925 half of which were built after 43 (13,638).
So, Assault gun production was a major deal in the German army. they created battalions and at least one division (IIRC) made up just with assault guns.


Cheers...

The Jadgpanther was deployed in about a dozen seperate heavy antitank battalions that were assigned at Army level for use. These battalions rarely had their full complement of Jadgpanther and were usually mixed with Jgpz IV/L70, StuG III or, occasionally Hetzers.
These units saw service on both the Western and Eastern Fronts from mid 1944 on. Encounters with this vehicle were comparatively rare but frequently occured, as would be expected, at critical points on the front lines.

Also, I believe that just over 400 of them were made. Is that correct?

__________________
On the Plains of Hesitation
lies the blackend bones of countless millions
who, at the dawn of victory sat down to rest,
and resting died....
(author unknown-I wish it was me)

According to this website:


Jagdpanzer IV Sd. Kfz. 162 - 75mm L/48 (1944)


It was:





This website includes everything you would ever want to know.

__________________
For want of a nail the shoe was lost, for the want of a shoe the horse was lost, for the want of a horse the rider was lost, for the want of a rider the battle was lost, For want of a battle the kingdom was lost, and all for the want of a horseshoe nail.

Robert,

It's the JagdPanther that's being discussed not the JagdPanzer IV And A-58, in post number 8 (Jagdpanthers) I placed all German Assault guns production. If you check it out, you'll see 392 were produced so yeah. around 400.



Cheers...

__________________
Battles don't win wars, Logistics do!

I assume you mean Jagdpanthers 392 from two manufactures,

With regard to Jagdpanther Vs Churchills if you look at Peter Beales Book Tank Tracks -a history of the 9th Btn RTR available to read on line at RTR web site,

Home Page - The Royal Tank Regiment

Churchill crews were more able to deal with them by the time of the fighting in the Reichswald.

the increasing confidence of Churchill crews in dealing with SPGs in particular seems to grow from October 1944 which tends to make me think that the spectacular losses by the Scotts guards and the 7th and 9th RTR could be put down to surprise and inexperience- certainly the three Jagdpanther crews involved must have been very expierienced.

I think that the Jadgpanther suffers from the same problems as other late German tanks: they preferred quality over quantity, and they suffered from mechanical failures, although they were heavily armed and armoured. Also, the Jagdpanther came too late to change anything IMHO.

Its an impressive looking machine though; very fear-imposing

__________________
Best Regards, Hufflepuff

OH I see, I seem to have misread, ah everything.


If anybody needs me I will be drowning my sorrows in the corner.

__________________
For want of a nail the shoe was lost, for the want of a shoe the horse was lost, for the want of a horse the rider was lost, for the want of a rider the battle was lost, For want of a battle the kingdom was lost, and all for the want of a horseshoe nail.

Robert,

And I missed the quote of the number of jagdpanthers that were constructed in post 8. Which corner are you in? I'll be there in a minute. Can't drown sorrows properly without beer. I hear that Za either sells or bootlegs beer. Where is he when you need him!

__________________
On the Plains of Hesitation
lies the blackend bones of countless millions
who, at the dawn of victory sat down to rest,
and resting died....
(author unknown-I wish it was me)

The one in the round room


While we wait for Za's 'shipment' to arrive I do have this hidden the attic.


I stole it from Hitler himself.

__________________
For want of a nail the shoe was lost, for the want of a shoe the horse was lost, for the want of a horse the rider was lost, for the want of a rider the battle was lost, For want of a battle the kingdom was lost, and all for the want of a horseshoe nail.

Robert,

Why is the Jagdpanther called the best tank destroyer of WW2?

I'd say that title goes to the M-36 slugger with the 90mm gun (and it has a turret, too!..)

No glasses, then we'll brother-in-law it....

__________________
On the Plains of Hesitation
lies the blackend bones of countless millions
who, at the dawn of victory sat down to rest,
and resting died....
(author unknown-I wish it was me)

The mechanical problems were likely worse. The transmission was the same as in the Panther. Since the Jadgpanther would have to use that much harder than the straight tank (ie., having to move the tank to position it for firing versus rotating the turret) I would assume that it is more prone to breakdown.
Like the Jadgtiger an added difficulty is getting the transmission out and back into the vehicle. In a Jadgpanther this would require removing the gun and roof of the fighting compartment among other things.

Were the Jagdpanther battalions another "teeth" heavy formation designed to intercept enemy armored formations (so naturally, they have no integral combined arms and infantry)? (Like the Tiger Tank Battalions?)

The standard S. PzJr Abt. had three companies each of three platoons of either 4 or 6 AFV and two headquarters vehicles. Typically late war this was 14 vehicles per company authorized.
The Abteilung headquarters had two or three more vehicles along with several motor vehicles. There was also a light maintenance company attached like in panzer battalions.

14 per company...thats alot more than I thought!

I always thought that the tanks destroyers were used mixed in with regular tank units. Guess not.

__________________
Best Regards, Hufflepuff

Most Jadgpanther abteilung had a mix of vehicles. There were rarely sufficent Jadgpanther to fill the entire battalion out. More commonly, there would be say, 12 to 20 Jadgpanther and an equal number of Jgpz IV /L70 assigned.

I think the JagdPanther would be less breakdown prone than the standard panther.

It had the same mechanics but it was 10 tons lighter. That would relieve the overtaxed transmission and drive train making them last longer. The increase in movement wouldn't be so severe.
Oh and it was called the "best" because like the panther, if the sun was shining and the mechanics held, it was a fearsome beast. It could take any tank at any range and had excellent power-to-weight ratio... The usual. Then again, anything with a long 88 was a fearsome weapon and achieved good combat records.




Cheers...

__________________
Battles don't win wars, Logistics do!