Axis

Members: 12,640
Threads: 26,918
Posts: 330,233
Online: 218

Newest Member:
klb-61

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > General Discussion > Weapons in WWII
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #26 (permalink)  
Old October 12th, 2009, 08:38 PM
Visukinttu's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 12
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Visukinttu is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Panzerfaust

Quote:
Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
In West Germany the Panzerfaust was resurrected in the Panzerfaust 3 as well.
Ummmm... Panzerfaust was a descendant of PzF 44 Lanze, which had not much to do with Panzerfaust (except the same kind of warhead - as every AT-weapon at that time). Do you mean Panzerschreck?
__________________
==========
Swine flu *oink*
==========
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old October 12th, 2009, 08:42 PM
redcoat's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stockport , England
Posts: 1,139
Salute!: 25
Saluted 58 Times in 38 Posts
redcoat is a jewel in the roughredcoat is a jewel in the roughredcoat is a jewel in the roughredcoat is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Panzerfaust

Quote:
Originally Posted by sf_cwo2 View Post
Are you guys afraid of research? I don't know what your hang-up is. I never said it was perfect. It was done. Watch the '45 wochenschau vids of Großdeutschland units fighting (IIRC in East Prussia). You'll see the technique in use. Wait-- maybe they are firing at really, really, really low-flying aircraft and the missed rounds happened to impact the ground near enemy units! But how do you explain the training video... gross translation errors?
What you saw was the panzerfaust being used in a direct fire role. They were aiming it at the target, it was just that the drop in the trajectory of the warhead after it was fired was so great they had to hold the weapon at a steep angle in order to hit the target.
__________________
if in doubt....Panic!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old October 13th, 2009, 12:59 AM
Alte Hase
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 12,055
Salute!: 105
Saluted 169 Times in 127 Posts
Erich has disabled reputation
Default Re: Panzerfaust

if you guys-some of you are referring to a bunker buster then yes, it was used in house to house on the Ost front besides laying in the open with the Panzerfaust 150 which had a rough range of 100 yds US for the typcial wait for the Soviet panzer and don't miss !

it was used in varying roles
__________________
Rip it up !
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old October 13th, 2009, 06:25 AM
sf_cwo2's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 77
Salute!: 2
Saluted 2 Times in 2 Posts
sf_cwo2 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Panzerfaust

Quote:
Originally Posted by Visukinttu View Post
Ummmm... Panzerfaust was a descendant of PzF 44 Lanze, which had not much to do with Panzerfaust (except the same kind of warhead - as every AT-weapon at that time). Do you mean Panzerschreck?
Umm, what do you mean? The PzF 44 and PzF 3 are both follow-on programs of the WW2 panzerfaust series.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old October 17th, 2009, 10:49 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 887
Salute!: 179
Saluted 95 Times in 72 Posts
Triple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Panzerfaust

My favorite comment on weapons of this type is quoted as the following.

Quote:
The difficult terrain on which the winter campaign was fought, the prevalence of pitched battles at night and in fog, the tactical failure of the American 57-mm. antitank gun, and the paucity of German assault guns and self-propelled tank destroyers brought the bazooka into a place of prominence on both sides of the line. Admittedly the bazooka was a suicide weapon, but there were always brave men-mostly platoon and squad leaders-to risk its use against an enemy tank. In the autumn of 1944 the German Army recognized that it was too late for building tank destroyers in the numbers required and that in any case fuel was lacking for their transport into battle. Therefore the decision was made to build hand rocket weapons and rely on the courage of the "single fighter"-a decision like that made in 1917-1918 when the Kaiser's army turned to armor-piercing rifles in the hands of the single fighter to stop Allied tanks. In December 1944 both sides learned that infantry companies armed with bazookas could not do the work of tank destroyers.
Reply With Quote
  #31 (permalink)  
Old October 19th, 2009, 11:46 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 182
Salute!: 4
Saluted 6 Times in 4 Posts
Drucius is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Panzerfaust

Quote:
Originally Posted by Triple C View Post
My favorite comment on weapons of this type is quoted as the following.
What was the quote from? It pretty much reflects my views of infantry weapons almost exactly.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old October 19th, 2009, 02:46 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 887
Salute!: 179
Saluted 95 Times in 72 Posts
Triple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Panzerfaust

The Ami official history of the Battle of the Bulge. I think that comment about hand-held infantry AT weapons remain true today.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old October 20th, 2009, 03:39 PM
Sack Time's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cawood, KY
Posts: 23
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sack Time is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Panzerfaust

If I'm not mistaken, the Faust was the first shaped-charge warhead to be used in military service.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old October 20th, 2009, 03:54 PM
T. A. Gardner's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 4,510
Salute!: 4
Saluted 243 Times in 165 Posts
T. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Panzerfaust

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sack Time View Post
If I'm not mistaken, the Faust was the first shaped-charge warhead to be used in military service.
You are mistaken. The first hollow charge weapon used in action was the German Half-Hohlladung in various sizes. The use of large 50kg charges at the fortress Eben Emal in Belgium was the first actual use. The 3kg charge with magnets was used as an antitank weapon.
Next up was the US bazooka. The Panzerschrek actually proceeded the Panzerfaust in development too.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old October 20th, 2009, 05:58 PM
lwd lwd is offline
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,254
Salute!: 9
Saluted 59 Times in 51 Posts
lwd is a jewel in the roughlwd is a jewel in the roughlwd is a jewel in the roughlwd is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Panzerfaust

Quote:
Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
You are mistaken. The first hollow charge weapon used in action was the German Half-Hohlladung in various sizes. The use of large 50kg charges at the fortress Eben Emal in Belgium was the first actual use. The 3kg charge with magnets was used as an antitank weapon.
Next up was the US bazooka. The Panzerschrek actually proceeded the Panzerfaust in development too.
Well these probably saw action before the bazooka:
No. 68 AT Grenade - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And I believe the bazooka was based on the US equivalant.
High explosive anti-tank warhead - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
lists several other HEAT rounds that probably saw action before the bazooka.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old October 22nd, 2009, 12:04 AM
Sack Time's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cawood, KY
Posts: 23
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sack Time is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Panzerfaust

Quote:
Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
You are mistaken. The first hollow charge weapon used in action was the German Half-Hohlladung in various sizes. The use of large 50kg charges at the fortress Eben Emal in Belgium was the first actual use. The 3kg charge with magnets was used as an antitank weapon.
Next up was the US bazooka. The Panzerschrek actually proceeded the Panzerfaust in development too.
Thanks for the info. Actually never heard of the German HH. I need to brush up on my anti-tank weapon history it seems.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old October 22nd, 2009, 01:41 AM
Chesehead121's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sitting in a foxhole with a Tiger overhead
Posts: 111
Salute!: 7
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Chesehead121 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Panzerfaust

Well, lwd, Wikipedia (as you probably know, not trying to discredit you here) might not be the best source. Although these look like good articles, so it works for me. Also, I heard (from The Fall of Berlin 1945) that captured 'fausts were definately used in house to house fighting. In essence, the theory was: need a wall blown down? Use a panzerfaust. Pros: Shockwave kills a bunch of people, a panzerfaust can easily blow through a brick wall, and a warm backdraft provides a nice respite from the winter cold!
__________________
To the German Commander-- Nuts.

-- The American Commander
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old October 22nd, 2009, 02:21 AM
T. A. Gardner's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 4,510
Salute!: 4
Saluted 243 Times in 165 Posts
T. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Panzerfaust

The British Mk 68 and US M9A1 antitank rifle grenades appear at about the same time. The Bazooka and original Rakentenwerfer 43 Puppchen are next in line with the Bazooka getting into service in mid 42 with the Puppchen following by late 42 early 43. The Panzerfaust goes into trials in March 43 and a pre-production field trials batch of 3000 was released in July 43 to the East front.
The Germans also produced a range of HEAT antitank rifle grenades for their standard rifle grenade discharger cup and the 27mm Kampfpistolle from mid 42 on as well. These were copied by the Japanese and issued in limited numbers starting in 1944 also.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old October 22nd, 2009, 10:47 AM
TiredOldSoldier's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 902
Salute!: 26
Saluted 77 Times in 62 Posts
TiredOldSoldier is a jewel in the roughTiredOldSoldier is a jewel in the roughTiredOldSoldier is a jewel in the roughTiredOldSoldier is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Panzerfaust

What about that strange contraption fired from the Pak 36 ?
Think it was called Stielgranade 41 and was in use by 1942.

HEAT rounds Gr 38 HL for the 75mm weapons were also in use in 1942 and possibly earlier.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old October 22nd, 2009, 01:59 PM
lwd lwd is offline
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,254
Salute!: 9
Saluted 59 Times in 51 Posts
lwd is a jewel in the roughlwd is a jewel in the roughlwd is a jewel in the roughlwd is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Panzerfaust

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chesehead121 View Post
Well, lwd, Wikipedia (as you probably know, not trying to discredit you here) might not be the best source.
Indeed. Especially with more obscure info. However this was consistent with what I remember reading about the development of the Bazooka. Still pays to check.
Quote:
Although these look like good articles, so it works for me. Also, I heard (from The Fall of Berlin 1945) that captured 'fausts were definately used in house to house fighting. ...
I remember reading somewhere that the commander of one US division gave orders that any captured panzerfaust were to be collected for redistribution and use by his troops. One of the airborne division I think but could be off on this.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old October 22nd, 2009, 04:18 PM
T. A. Gardner's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 4,510
Salute!: 4
Saluted 243 Times in 165 Posts
T. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to beholdT. A. Gardner is a splendid one to behold
Default Re: Panzerfaust

The bazooka round is an outgrowth of the M10 rifle grenade designed to be fired from the .50 machinegun (using a blank cartridge). Procured in limited quantity starting in 1940 the M10 formed the basis for the bazooka round. US Army Captain Skinner was assigned to develop and investigate the use of rockets in war at the time and with limited funds started development of an antitank rocket by fitting a motor to the M10 grenade.
His counterpart in the US Navy was Lieutenant Uhl and the two had had some dealings. Lt. Uhl and Cptn Skinner arranged to work together on making and launching M10 grenades with the rocket motor assembly attached. Uhl came up with the tube launcher while Skinner devised a firing mechanism. A test rig was ready in March 1942 and testing took place at Aberdeen Proving Ground. Someone at the tests pointed out the similarity of this device in looks to comedian Bob Burn's insturment the "Bazooka" and a weapon was named.
The tests went well and the US Army quickly ordered 5,000 produced. The US Navy saw no future use for this particular weapon so they withdrew from the project.
E. G. Budd Co. was the rocket manufacturer. Hercules Powder, DuPont Chemical, Atlas Powder and, American Cyanamid provided the motor fuel and explosives for the warhead. GE Bridgeport CT manufactured the launcher (they produced 5,000 in 30 days to the initial order) and eventually produced 450,000 launchers.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old October 22nd, 2009, 05:24 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 887
Salute!: 179
Saluted 95 Times in 72 Posts
Triple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Panzerfaust

Quote:
Originally Posted by lwd View Post
I remember reading somewhere that the commander of one US division gave orders that any captured panzerfaust were to be collected for redistribution and use by his troops. One of the airborne division I think but could be off on this.
Gavin. Max Hastings wrote about this in Armageddon.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old October 29th, 2009, 06:36 AM
recruit
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
gosgirl is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Panzerfaust

For most panzerfaust this meant you needed to be about 20 yards or less from your target to score a hit.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old October 30th, 2009, 04:09 AM
WotNoChad?'s Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Invasion Corner, England.
Posts: 870
Salute!: 71
Saluted 72 Times in 52 Posts
WotNoChad? is a jewel in the roughWotNoChad? is a jewel in the roughWotNoChad? is a jewel in the roughWotNoChad? is a jewel in the roughWotNoChad? is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Canucks at play.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Von Poop View Post
Oh that's excellent, it must have taken ages to dismantle that and cock them all again. But I imagine the effect was worth it even if it was under 40lbs of explosive in total.

IMHO it's just this kind of improvisation which gave our Allied ancestors the win.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old October 30th, 2009, 05:22 AM
Greg Canellis's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 46
Salute!: 1
Saluted 2 Times in 1 Post
Greg Canellis is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Panzerfaust

A veteran friend of mine who served in Company I, 13th Infantry Regiment, 8th Division told me when possible, his squad liked the smaller Faustpatrone, and collected them when they ran across them. The Faustpatrone was effective on log dug outs and machine gun nests, as well as, house to house fighting - blowing holes in walls etc. They also liked the German "potato masher" hand grenade for its TNT content. They were good for blowing doors off buildings, or whereever an explosion was needed with minimal fragmentation.

Greg C.
__________________
"These are my credentials!"-Brig. Gen. Charles D.W. Canham [pointing to GI's of Company I, 13th Infantry Regiment, 8th Infantry Division] to General der Fallschirmjager Hermann Bernhard Ramcke, Crozon Peninsula September 19, 1944.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old October 31st, 2009, 10:29 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: In the forefront of the Siegfried Line (no joke!)
Posts: 16
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Obergefreiter is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Panzerfaust

The Panzerfaust fired hollow charge projectiles. These could - and would - be used as a substitute for HE projectiles by German AT guns or Sturmgeschütze. Even so, German infanty used their Panzerschrecks to provide their own indirect fire support. Panzerschreck was a derivative of captured US bazookas, but with 88 mm calibre, to which the US switched after some unpleasant encounters with the T-34 in Korea.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old November 5th, 2009, 11:53 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Britain
Posts: 39
Salute!: 5
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Zefer is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Panzerfaust

I heard the Panzerfaust was a very inaccurate weapon, is this true?
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old November 6th, 2009, 06:05 PM
Alte Hase
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Platonic Sphere
Posts: 12,055
Salute!: 105
Saluted 169 Times in 127 Posts
Erich has disabled reputation
Default Re: Panzerfaust

within the 50yeds minimum it was devastating and even beyond. remember this was a very close support weapon used by all German folk just not he military. think everyone has seen enough pics showing the training of old men, women and even children with this arm......and I do not mean pics of the Volkssturm either
__________________
Rip it up !
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old November 12th, 2009, 05:21 PM
lwd lwd is offline
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,254
Salute!: 9
Saluted 59 Times in 51 Posts
lwd is a jewel in the roughlwd is a jewel in the roughlwd is a jewel in the roughlwd is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Panzerfaust

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obergefreiter View Post
... but with 88 mm calibre, to which the US switched after some unpleasant encounters with the T-34 in Korea.
The US started production of the bigger bazookas in WWII but didn't issue them as they were thought to be unnecessary. The problems in Korea vs T-34 weren't so much a problem with the size of the bazooka's round as the fact that they were using very degraded WWII ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old November 13th, 2009, 06:36 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 887
Salute!: 179
Saluted 95 Times in 72 Posts
Triple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the roughTriple C is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Panzerfaust

There is a live fire bazooka penetration test that I have read. Basically, the bazooka's penetration performance was surprisingly bad against heavily sloped armor. 45mm plate sloped at 60 degrees like the T-34 would be invulnerable frontally to bazooka rounds, but if the slope was reduced to 30 degrees than armor plates doubled that thickness were easily penetrated. Against decent bazooka ammunition T-34 kills are quite possible, but preferably you do it from ambush positions.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which came first, the Panzerschreck or Panzerfaust? stephens90 Information Requests 18 July 18th, 2009 03:44 PM
Panzerfaust 60M Kai-Petri Militaria 3 July 30th, 2007 08:07 PM
Japanese Panzerfaust CombatCollectionGuy Weapons in WWII 2 January 18th, 2007 01:52 AM
Panzerfaust Reproductions Engberg Weapons in WWII 2 September 17th, 2006 01:57 AM
Site on Panzerfaust TheRedBaron WWII General 3 April 14th, 2003 06:46 PM


Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Allies