|
|  |
 |
Members: 14,849
Threads: 30,365
Posts: 366,571
Online: 249
Newest Member:
jimmccullough |
|
|
| Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two |

October 9th, 2009, 02:30 AM
|
 |
Graybeard 
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hatboro, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,061
Salute!: 233
Saluted 361 Times in 263 Posts
|
|
Russian Flying Fortress
Now here's a plane.
"In 1930s Russian army was … by the idea of creating huge planes. At that times they were proposed to have as much propellers as possible to help carrying those huge flying fortresses into the air, jet propulsion has not been implemented at those times yet. Not much photos were saved since that times, because of the high secrecy levels of such projects and because a lot of time passed already. Still on the photo below you can see one of such planes - a heavy bomber K-7.
Now modern history lovers in Russia try to reconstruct according the plans left in once to be top-secret Russian army archives their look in full color. This is one example based on ideas of Russian aviation engineers of that times."
English Russia » Russian Flying Fortresses
__________________
"Faint heart never won fair maiden", so I say "Go for it!"
Lou
|

October 11th, 2009, 01:00 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Long Island, New York - United States
Posts: 291
Salute!: 16
Saluted 13 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Flying Fortress
LOL that translation is terrible j/k
Imagine if that thing actually WORKED lol probably would've taken just one of them to take out Dresden.
__________________

Easily the most overpowered tank in history. Seriously - dual 280mm cannons?! It's not like the Allies had a tank with 200mm of armor!
|

October 11th, 2009, 07:14 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 1,048
Salute!: 37
Saluted 85 Times in 68 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Flying Fortress
The second plane looks much smaller than the monster in the first pic. The first pic looks modern though all the equipment laround it ooks vintage. Wonder what the tail weel is for, possibly to prevent the tail hitting the runway if the initial climb angle was too steep.
This is very intersting I'd always believed the ANT-20 was as far as they went, has anyone any more info, tried to follow the links but got nowhere.
BTW I thing the multi engined between the wars designs were because the best available engines of the the time were in the 600HP range, give a 2200Hp R-3350 and they would use fewer of them.
|

October 11th, 2009, 07:29 AM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 10,031
Salute!: 79
Saluted 198 Times in 111 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Flying Fortress
Makes the Spruce Goose look like a Spitfire....
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

October 11th, 2009, 04:32 PM
|
 |
Graybeard 
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hatboro, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,061
Salute!: 233
Saluted 361 Times in 263 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Flying Fortress
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiredOldSoldier
The second plane looks much smaller than the monster in the first pic. The first pic looks modern though all the equipment laround it ooks vintage. Wonder what the tail weel is for, possibly to prevent the tail hitting the runway if the initial climb angle was too steep.
This is very intersting I'd always believed the ANT-20 was as far as they went, has anyone any more info, tried to follow the links but got nowhere.
BTW I thing the multi engined between the wars designs were because the best available engines of the the time were in the 600HP range, give a 2200Hp R-3350 and they would use fewer of them.
|
Actually, I think it's two different planes. The one on the bottom is a K-7 bomber.
Kalinin K-7 - bomber, passenger
SPECIFICATIONS:
CREW 12
PASSENGERS 128
ENGINE 7 x M34F, 550kW
WEIGHTS
Take-off weight 38000 kg 83776 lb
Empty weight 24400 kg 53793 lb
DIMENSIONS
Wingspan 53.0 m 173 ft 11 in
Length 28.0 m 91 ft 10 in
Wing area 454.0 m2 4886.81 sq ft
PERFORMANCE
Max. speed 234 km/h 145 mph
Cruise speed 180 km/h 112 mph
Ceiling 4000 m 13100 ft
Range 3030 km 1883 miles
I believe the one on the top was built from "secret" plans in an archives.
__________________
"Faint heart never won fair maiden", so I say "Go for it!"
Lou
Last edited by LRusso216; October 11th, 2009 at 04:38 PM.
|

October 11th, 2009, 05:59 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: CenTex
Posts: 234
Salute!: 13
Saluted 12 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Flying Fortress
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiredOldSoldier
The second plane looks much smaller than the monster in the first pic.
|
If you look closely at the first picture it appears to be computer generated. Look at the soft lines around the structures and the background.
__________________
""The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." George Patton" George S. Patton
|

October 12th, 2009, 09:07 AM
|
 |
The One From Down Under 
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia - Brisbane
Posts: 3,573
Salute!: 271
Saluted 117 Times in 85 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Flying Fortress
I was more looking at the lack of detail in the background, it looks like off.
__________________
For want of a nail the shoe was lost, for the want of a shoe the horse was lost, for the want of a horse the rider was lost, for the want of a rider the battle was lost, For want of a battle the kingdom was lost, and all for the want of a horseshoe nail.
Robert,
|

November 23rd, 2009, 01:16 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 260
Salute!: 1
Saluted 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Flying Fortress
How many miles would the take-off roll for either plane be?
Good thing the Russia was so roomy at the time.
tom
|

November 26th, 2009, 09:31 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rome, Italy
Posts: 1,048
Salute!: 37
Saluted 85 Times in 68 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Flying Fortress
Definetly computer generated look at this
Must admit they fooled me. They must have added these since I visited that site, worth a look as a couple are really funny
http://englishrussia.com/?p=2231
|

December 7th, 2009, 03:21 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: CenTex
Posts: 234
Salute!: 13
Saluted 12 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Russian Flying Fortress
Ha! The structural integrity of that aircraft is amazing!
__________________
""The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." George Patton" George S. Patton
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:56 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2010, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.
|
 |