|
|  |
 |
Members: 12,642
Threads: 26,929
Posts: 330,291
Online: 338
Newest Member:
Iivar |
|
|
| Weapons in WWII Discussion about the weapons and war machines created during World War Two |

October 21st, 2009, 03:29 AM
|
|
recruit
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
How would YOU equip your army?
If you were a small country in the European Theater during World War II, and you had the choice to equip your country with ANY weapon from ANY country, as long as it had been made and in service before 1945, which would you choose? As a new member of this forum I'm interested in which weapons the general population here prefers.
Sub-machine Gun:
Bolt-Action Rifle:
Semi-Automatic Rifle:
Sniper Rifle :
Side-Arm:
Light Machine Gun:
Heavy Machine Gun:
|

October 21st, 2009, 03:48 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,968
Salute!: 116
Saluted 140 Times in 115 Posts
|
|
Re: How would YOU equip your army?
Hi Tommy, welcome to the forum. We do already have many threads similar to this, as well as threads comparing different weapons. Here is one you might be interested in:
Overall Favorite Weapon
For individual weapons such as the Garand vs. the Kar98k, etc. and anything else you want to know, use the search button before posting up a new thread:
http://www.ww2f.com/search.php
Also, in the future when creating threads it is good to include your opinion on the issue first
Good luck,
Jon
__________________
"If you want peace work for justice" -Pope Paul VI
Jon
|

October 21st, 2009, 01:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: How would YOU equip your army?
I'll kick it off!
Sub-machine Gun:
MP40 - relatively cheap and easy to manufacturer, but still effective...fires a standard 9mm round!
Bolt-Action Rifle:
Lee Enfield No.4 - accurate, reliable, good range, can hold 10 rounds, deadly in the hands of a well trained squad
Semi-Automatic Rifle:
M1 Garand- It isn't to complex or expensive to make like some of the German options, very effective
Sniper Rifle :
Don't know much about Sniper Rifles, but basically a bolt action with a good scope. A Mosin Nagant or a K98
Side-Arm:
Walther P-38 - I prefer the 9mm over the .45 and as a sidearm a 9mm is enough...it is cheaper and if you have the MP40 may as well keep it 9mm.
Light Machine Gun:
Bren - superb LMG truly a squad level MG unlike the BAR. It weighed similar to the BAR but deployed in a firefight it could and often did make the difference.
Heavy Machine Gun:
MG42- What a beast! Arguably the best MG ever made. A few well established MG42's could rip through any enemy forces. It might be expensive and more difficult to manage, but it was very effective!
|

October 23rd, 2009, 05:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 419
Salute!: 72
Saluted 27 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Re: How would YOU equip your army?
This is a good question
Sub-machine Gun: NONE
Bolt-Action Rifle: See: Sniper rifle
Semi-Automatic Rifle: MP-44
Sniper Rifle : Mauser Kar 98 or Springfield with scope
Side-Arm: 45 Auto
Light Machine Gun: MG-42
Heavy Machine Gun: Browning .50
I have an interesting idea, want to read what the actual roll-out of most of the losers early in the war probably would really have looked like?
LOSER'S WEAPONS ROLL OUT
Sub-machine Gun: US Reising .45 (jam-a-matic)
Bolt-Action Rifle: French MAS 36
Semi-Automatic Rifle: WW1 Springfield Semi auto conversion kit fitted in 30.06 (not only big and hard to use, a ridiculous change-over from WW1! Couldnt ask for something the troops would hate more!)
Sniper Rifle : PPSH-41 fitted as a scope and single shot
Side-Arm: Japanese Nambu (jammer and ridiculously underpowered round)
Light Machine Gun: any italian model
Heavy Machine Gun: Boys anti tank rifle with conversion kit for semi-auto (last minute engineered nd deployed while the Germans or Japanese were about to over- run your capital)
If you really wanted your troops to be as ineffective as most of the great powers seemed to be determined to make them, you couldn't ask for a worse weapons inventory. And to make matters even more impossible for your fighting men, note the amazingly stupid number of different calibers required, 6 in all! You couldnt ask for a better recipe for a useless fighting force, right there!
|

October 23rd, 2009, 07:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Britain
Posts: 39
Salute!: 5
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: How would YOU equip your army?
I shall get round to posting mine later, as for now I have a few comments.
Butts,
You seem to speak fondly of the Lee Enfield No.4 and you describe it in the exact same way you describe your requirements for a sniper rifle; have you not considered it as one?
marc780,
Can you explain the concept of a single shot sub-machine gun (effectively a pistol?) fitted with an optic scope?
|

October 23rd, 2009, 07:36 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Billings Montana, USA
Posts: 3,029
Salute!: 379
Saluted 520 Times in 344 Posts
|
|
Re: How would YOU equip your army?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zefer
marc780,
Can you explain the concept of a single shot sub-machine gun (effectively a pistol?) fitted with an optic scope?
|
I'm not "marc780", but he put that weapon into his "losers" list. Probably as a tongue in cheek laugh.
__________________
Happy Trails,
Clint.
|

October 24th, 2009, 02:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 419
Salute!: 72
Saluted 27 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Re: How would YOU equip your army?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zefer
I shall get round to posting mine later, as for now I have a few comments.
Butts,
You seem to speak fondly of the Lee Enfield No.4 and you describe it in the exact same way you describe your requirements for a sniper rifle; have you not considered it as one?
marc780,
Can you explain the concept of a single shot sub-machine gun (effectively a pistol?) fitted with an optic scope?
|
Please note this was listed under my "loser's roll out" as in, i was being facetious in this half of the post!
|

October 25th, 2009, 02:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: How would YOU equip your army?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zefer
I shall get round to posting mine later, as for now I have a few comments.
Butts,
You seem to speak fondly of the Lee Enfield No.4 and you describe it in the exact same way you describe your requirements for a sniper rifle; have you not considered it as one?
marc780,
Can you explain the concept of a single shot sub-machine gun (effectively a pistol?) fitted with an optic scope?
|
Just thought I would give a different response to that one, just to make it interesting rather than repeat myself. Good sniper rifle!
|

October 28th, 2009, 04:54 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: South Carolina, US
Posts: 25
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: How would YOU equip your army?
Tough question. Most armies got what they could lay their hands on, but this is definitely an interesting premise. I am doing my list not on weapons that make sense logistically(same calibers), but rather effectiveness.
Sub-machine gun: PPSH-41. Not the most glamorous weapon out there but effective and cheap to make. It was tough, reliable(some issues with drums), had an insane ROF, and overall easy to use.
Bolt-action rifle: Lee-Enfield. Just as accurate as the others but with a higher bullet capacity(10 rounds).
Semi-automatic rifle: M1 Garand. Accurate, reliable, and good stopping power. Much better than any comtempories.
Sniper rifle: any bolt action rifle of the period with a scope was suitable for this task. Optics are more an issue than rifles in this category.
Side arm: Colt .45 for stopping power.
Light-machine gun: MG-42. Undisputable really.
Heavy machine gun: .50 cal Browning. These types of weapons didnt see as much infantry action as light machine guns, with the exception of Russian Maxims that the Red Army lugged around on sleds and carts.(heavy mg's saw more use on planes,ships, and personnal carriers.)
|

October 28th, 2009, 04:50 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 29
Salute!: 1
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: How would YOU equip your army?
Assault rifle:STG44 which replaces nearly a SMG's and rifles.
Rifle:For sniping the lee-enfield accurate and powerfull.Also the garand for medium range sniping.
Side arm:The p38 simple cheap and good enough.
LMG:MG 42 extremely effective against infantry.
HMG:M2 great vs planes,and light armored vehicles.
Paratrooper rifle:FG42.
SMG:PPSH-41 nice round with great penetration good accuracy low recoil,cheap rounds.(and no drums because the advantage of a drum is having 71 bullets but it's much less comfortable and reloading is harder and it's heavier also jamming might be a problem)
|

November 4th, 2009, 06:15 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 50
Salute!: 1
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: How would YOU equip your army?
Sub-machine Gun:German Mp 40
Bolt-Action Rifle:USSR Mosin Nagant
Semi-Automatic Rifle: American M1 Garand
Sniper Rifle : German Scoped 98 Mauser
Side-Arm: American Colt 1911 .45 ACP or the British revolver
Light Machine Gun: Bren
Heavy Machine Gun: Browning 50 Cal.
And Bayonets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
The bayonet is a weapon that is out of date yet instills fear in all it is used against... fix bayonets at the onset of every battle
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:25 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |