Axis

Members: 14,851
Threads: 30,367
Posts: 366,624
Online: 333

Newest Member:
Acidburns

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > Theaters of the Second World War > Western Europe > Western Europe 1943 - 1945
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Western Europe 1943 - 1945 All Ground Combat between the Western Allies and the Axis Powers in Northwest Europe and Scandanavia between 1943 & December 1945.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #26 (permalink)  
Old December 22nd, 2008, 02:29 PM
bigfun's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: northern Illinois
Posts: 3,799
Salute!: 126
Saluted 94 Times in 65 Posts
bigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

I can't remember the title, maybe someone can help, but a GREAT book on the BOTB, is about the 99th I & R, and their fight. A very different look at the Bulge battle!
__________________
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old December 22nd, 2008, 04:14 PM
Slipdigit's Avatar
Good Ol' Boy
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Deep in the Heart of Dixie
Posts: 8,977
Salute!: 43
Saluted 57 Times in 33 Posts
Slipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant future
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

This book?
Amazon.com: The Longest Winter: The Battle of the Bulge and the Epic Story of WWII's Most Decorated Platoon: The Kindle Store: Alex Kershaw

About the Lyle Bouch's platoon and their fight at Lanzerath?
__________________
Best Regards,
JW


Flag of the State of Alabama
Reply With Quote
The Following User Salutes Slipdigit For This Useful Post:
bigfun (December 22nd, 2008)
  #28 (permalink)  
Old December 22nd, 2008, 04:20 PM
bigfun's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: northern Illinois
Posts: 3,799
Salute!: 126
Saluted 94 Times in 65 Posts
bigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

That's it!! Thanks Slip! Great book!
__________________
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old December 22nd, 2008, 04:24 PM
Slipdigit's Avatar
Good Ol' Boy
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Deep in the Heart of Dixie
Posts: 8,977
Salute!: 43
Saluted 57 Times in 33 Posts
Slipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant futureSlipdigit has a brilliant future
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

I would have like to have met those men.
__________________
Best Regards,
JW


Flag of the State of Alabama
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old December 22nd, 2008, 04:30 PM
bigfun's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: northern Illinois
Posts: 3,799
Salute!: 126
Saluted 94 Times in 65 Posts
bigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Me too Slip, me too.
__________________
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #31 (permalink)  
Old December 22nd, 2008, 05:27 PM
JCFalkenbergIII's Avatar
Expert
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 10,460
Salute!: 45
Saluted 212 Times in 182 Posts
JCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to all
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miguel B. View Post
I believe he was referring to the Fallschirmjager. They were the ones who were spread out so thin they had to pace back to their own lines.



Cheers...
I was wondering as Skorzeny's SS commandos were the ones that were dressed in US uniforms and were not air dropped that caused the big panic and rumors. Not Baron Von Der Hydte's Fallschirmjagers.
__________________


For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old December 22nd, 2008, 05:30 PM
JCFalkenbergIII's Avatar
Expert
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 10,460
Salute!: 45
Saluted 212 Times in 182 Posts
JCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to allJCFalkenbergIII is a name known to all
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slipdigit View Post
I have that book in my collection. Brave bunch of men. I think it would make a great movie. But we all know that the "Band of Brothers" won the Bulge .
__________________


For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old December 23rd, 2008, 04:48 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 29
Salute!: 3
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
socioanthroman is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

In the book, "A TIME FOR TRUMPETS," McDonald brings up the question on why didnt Eisenhower bring in Montys researves to also push out the germans. He actually used limited amounts of soldiers to stave off the attack, when he had plenty of soldiers to use. I finished reading this book about a month ago, a great book.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old December 23rd, 2008, 07:57 AM
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,135
Salute!: 252
Saluted 130 Times in 98 Posts
Triple C is just really niceTriple C is just really niceTriple C is just really niceTriple C is just really niceTriple C is just really niceTriple C is just really nice
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Though the Americans were convinced that the time had come to shift to a counteroffensive,earlier in the battle Eisenhower gave Montgomery full control of allied forces at the north half of the salient and it was aginst his philsophy to impose tactical decisions on his subordinates. Montgomery however was wary of going piecemeal and absolutely refused to go to the offensive until he was good and ready. In his defense, Monty deserved credit for forseeing the bloody struggle ahead in the Ardenes instead of a blitz even if the delays were lamentable.

Also, a crisis of command came into being by the Ardennes campaign, because of the blosoming of personal jealousies and hatreds between the British and American generals in the SHAEF HQ, to the point that at one time Eisenhower threaten Marshal that someone must be fired and was either Monty or Ike!
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old December 23rd, 2008, 11:16 AM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 17,287
Salute!: 561
Saluted 283 Times in 207 Posts
Kai-Petri has disabled reputation
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

I recall it was Montgomery´s first task to protect the bridges of Meuse and let no German forces get over the river. Monty by himself had early in the German offensive phase sent small units to check the bridges and possibly prepare them for blowing up. Not to start counterattacking himself.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old December 23rd, 2008, 01:42 PM
ghost_of_war's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 604
Salute!: 19
Saluted 6 Times in 6 Posts
ghost_of_war is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Quote:
Montgomery went and held a press conference and told the world that it was his units and his planning that saved the day
To make up for his planning of Market Garden eh?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old December 29th, 2008, 04:31 PM
4th wilts's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: torquay,devon.
Posts: 554
Salute!: 41
Saluted 7 Times in 7 Posts
4th wilts will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

hatred of generals...hhmm,i understood horrocks,c.o brit xxx corps,sent to shore up the northern bulge was liked by the american brass.
i read horrocks was horrified because the g.i,s never had hot food at this time.i will find the book soon.cheers.
__________________
"I never knew Canadians were as clever as that?".thankyou all,4th wilts.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old December 29th, 2008, 04:46 PM
bigfun's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: northern Illinois
Posts: 3,799
Salute!: 126
Saluted 94 Times in 65 Posts
bigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Yes definitely find that! I would like to read that story!
Thanks!!
__________________
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old December 30th, 2008, 08:19 AM
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,135
Salute!: 252
Saluted 130 Times in 98 Posts
Triple C is just really niceTriple C is just really niceTriple C is just really niceTriple C is just really niceTriple C is just really niceTriple C is just really nice
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

I recall it was Montgomery´s first task to protect the bridges of Meuse and let no German forces get over the river. Monty by himself had early in the German offensive phase sent small units to check the bridges and possibly prepare them for blowing up. Not to start counterattacking himself.

In deed. Apparently his decision to pull back the 82d ABN Div. and supporting arms to more defenable position was a staple of tactical good sense.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old December 30th, 2008, 09:12 AM
4th wilts's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: torquay,devon.
Posts: 554
Salute!: 41
Saluted 7 Times in 7 Posts
4th wilts will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

o.k bigfun,the book is called....44...dont know the authors name though,good sources etc.have a read of that,you may learn a bit.cheers.
__________________
"I never knew Canadians were as clever as that?".thankyou all,4th wilts.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old December 30th, 2008, 03:32 PM
Hufflepuff's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Here, There, and Everywhere.
Posts: 1,000
Salute!: 54
Saluted 15 Times in 15 Posts
Hufflepuff has a spectacular aura aboutHufflepuff has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Also the region itself is actually quite big
__________________
Best Regards, Hufflepuff
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old December 30th, 2008, 03:41 PM
PzJgr's Avatar
Drill Instructor
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 6,918
Salute!: 248
Saluted 308 Times in 210 Posts
PzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud of
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Quote:
Originally Posted by socioanthroman View Post
In the book, "A TIME FOR TRUMPETS," McDonald brings up the question on why didnt Eisenhower bring in Montys researves to also push out the germans. He actually used limited amounts of soldiers to stave off the attack, when he had plenty of soldiers to use. I finished reading this book about a month ago, a great book.
I also read somewhere that it was the time Monty thought it would take to get them going which prevented him from going into action before Patton. Also, didn't the Germans attack the American lines only? The British were farther North anways.
__________________

Last edited by PzJgr; December 30th, 2008 at 03:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old December 30th, 2008, 06:27 PM
bigfun's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: northern Illinois
Posts: 3,799
Salute!: 126
Saluted 94 Times in 65 Posts
bigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of lightbigfun is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4th wilts View Post
o.k bigfun,the book is called....44...dont know the authors name though,good sources etc.have a read of that,you may learn a bit.cheers.
Thanks!!
I'll add that to the list!!
__________________
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old December 30th, 2008, 11:39 PM
Wolfy's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NE USA
Posts: 1,795
Salute!: 420
Saluted 66 Times in 54 Posts
Wolfy is a jewel in the roughWolfy is a jewel in the roughWolfy is a jewel in the roughWolfy is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Bull View Post
I think that Pzjgr has a point ; motivation and experience are a factor.

Many of the German forces ( not all ,though ) were among the most seasoned in the Wehrmacht ( and probably, at that time, the World ). The Waffen-SS elements in particular were very well-equipped and months of planning had gone into the attack. And the word 'fanatical' is often (over-)used, but many of the Germans displayed a high level of motivation and aggression.

The Allies had to extemporize their response and develop a counter-stroke in extremely adverse conditions. And many of the Allied troops fought hard just to secure somewhere warm to sleep for the night - and I don't blame them !
The Waffen-SS and Heer Panzer and Panzergrenadier units that were deployed in the Ardennes were of abysmal quality compared to their former selves. They had suffered catastrophic losses in Normandy and the Falaise pocket (and the Eastern front) with their veteran Officer/NCO ranks decimated. Most assault infantrymen only had some rushed basic training, little more than a month or two.

They were also poorly equipped, with a lot of their mechanized/motorized transport missing. They also suffered around 1/3rds shortfall in tank strength with unsuitable assault guns sometimes replacing Panzers.

All the Units involved in the Ardennes offensive were only rated Kampfwert III/IV (only suitable for defensive actions) except for elements of the 2nd Panzer division which held a (II).
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old December 30th, 2008, 11:44 PM
Wolfy's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NE USA
Posts: 1,795
Salute!: 420
Saluted 66 Times in 54 Posts
Wolfy is a jewel in the roughWolfy is a jewel in the roughWolfy is a jewel in the roughWolfy is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

The actual combat power is relatively deceptive as well, since in many formations (the SS ones as well), a very large portion of barely trained troops (1/3rd of total battalion strength in many places, like the 1st-SSLAH) were held in reserve and not committed unless for emergency action.

I honestly don't understand how they held out like they did. They should've been swept away much sooner.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old December 30th, 2008, 11:59 PM
PzJgr's Avatar
Drill Instructor
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 6,918
Salute!: 248
Saluted 308 Times in 210 Posts
PzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud ofPzJgr has much to be proud of
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfy View Post
The Waffen-SS and Heer Panzer and Panzergrenadier units that were deployed in the Ardennes were of abysmal quality compared to their former selves. They had suffered catastrophic losses in Normandy and the Falaise pocket (and the Eastern front) with their veteran Officer/NCO ranks decimated. Most assault infantrymen only had some rushed basic training, little more than a month or two.

They were also poorly equipped, with a lot of their mechanized/motorized transport missing. They also suffered around 1/3rds shortfall in tank strength with unsuitable assault guns sometimes replacing Panzers.

All the Units involved in the Ardennes offensive were only rated Kampfwert III/IV (only suitable for defensive actions) except for elements of the 2nd Panzer division which held a (II).
Yes and no. Yes, all the older units lost a lot of their experienced soldiers but manpower was scrapped from all over to bring them up manpower wise as well as weapons. The quality may not have been as good as before but they were not inept. The units which were disappointing were the volkstrum divisions.

As for "all of the units" rating panzer mk III/IVs, well that is incorrect. The King Tiger made it's appearance in the west during this offensive.


Panthers were also used. But don't write off the Mk IV. It was still a considerable foe in the West.

The men were well armed. The difficiencies were in fuel and in ammo. In this case, Hitler fell for his own propaganda if he expected to go all the way to Antwerp because there was no way he could have succeeded with the logistics available to his forces.

More info here: http://www.history.army.mil/books/wwii/7-8/7-8_CONT.htm
__________________

Last edited by PzJgr; December 31st, 2008 at 12:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old December 31st, 2008, 01:05 AM
Wolfy's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NE USA
Posts: 1,795
Salute!: 420
Saluted 66 Times in 54 Posts
Wolfy is a jewel in the roughWolfy is a jewel in the roughWolfy is a jewel in the roughWolfy is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PzJgr View Post
Yes and no. Yes, all the older units lost a lot of their experienced soldiers but manpower was scrapped from all over to bring them up manpower wise as well as weapons. The quality may not have been as good as before but they were not inept. The units which were disappointing were the volkstrum divisions.
No, their performance was generally much inferior to their counterparts in Normandy and a far cry from 1943. A world away from 1941.

Quote:
As for "all of the units" rating panzer mk III/IVs, well that is incorrect. The King Tiger made it's appearance in the west during this offensive.

The men were well armed. The difficiencies were in fuel and in ammo. In this case, Hitler fell for his own propaganda if he expected to go all the way to Antwerp because there was no way he could have succeeded with the logistics available to his forces.
I have detailed interviews with all the major players in the Ardennes Offensive- Dietrich (6th Panzer Army), his chief of staff, the commander of the 5th Panzer Army, the commander 7th Panzer Army, etc. They have confirmed what I stated in the previous post. The Panzer divisions were all understrength in material and missing a lot of elements. Normandy/Bagration killed or wounded, in many units, up to half of the original Officer/NCO nucleus in these divisions.

The Kampfwert rating is not referring to Panzer Mark III/IV, but towards the overall quality of the division. It was a classification that the German staff officers used to evaluate the rehabilitation of their units. For instance, during Barbarrossa, the Panzer divisions were rated K- I. I/II rating were classifications indicating that the division was ready for offensive operations.

Even the SS Panzer divisions were rated III/IV in the offensive. Whatever achievements the Germans achieve... it was mainly thanks to surprise and the initial American disorganization.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old January 3rd, 2009, 04:51 PM
4th wilts's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: torquay,devon.
Posts: 554
Salute!: 41
Saluted 7 Times in 7 Posts
4th wilts will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

why has no one berated hodges or bradley for this defence of the ardennes anyway?.the germans could never attack there could they?.cheers..
__________________
"I never knew Canadians were as clever as that?".thankyou all,4th wilts.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old January 3rd, 2009, 05:53 PM
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In a windmill
Posts: 4,454
Salute!: 369
Saluted 314 Times in 221 Posts
urqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to allurqh is a name known to all
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Too true 4th Wilts....Theres no way they can come thru there sir...General Gamelin to General Georges....hang on....whoops a daisy.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old January 5th, 2009, 01:03 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 917
Salute!: 0
Saluted 27 Times in 19 Posts
Carl W Schwamberger Is actually quite decentCarl W Schwamberger Is actually quite decentCarl W Schwamberger Is actually quite decent
Default Re: Battle of the Bulge: What took them so long?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JCFalkenbergIII View Post
I was wondering as Skorzeny's SS commandos were the ones that were dressed in US uniforms and were not air dropped that caused the big panic and rumors. Not Baron Von Der Hydte's Fallschirmjagers.
My father was stationed at a medium bomber airfield some fifty miles south of Luxembourg city. On the 18th or 19th he spent a cold wet day leading his ordinance section around the countryside in search of a stray plane load of German teenagers. The untrained Luftwaffe pilots scattered the paras all over the Ardennes & south to the French border. For some 48 hours the rear area units were preoccupied with with converting 80,000 Fallschmirjager into 800 prisoners. The panic was so great my fathers airmen did not get a hot lunch that day & ate cold rations in the woods
__________________
I forgot my password, can I use yours?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What if germany won the battle of the bulge? Hawkerace What If - European Theater - Western Front & Atlantic 40 April 21st, 2008 08:17 PM
Battle of the Bulge 44/45 and Battle of Berlin 45 milos31 WWII Films & TV 1 October 28th, 2007 03:31 PM
Battle of the Bulge Kai-Petri Western Europe 1943 - 1945 57 May 22nd, 2007 01:46 PM
Battle Of The Bulge Nathan S. WWII Films & TV 15 July 9th, 2003 05:30 PM
Battle of the Bulge De Vlaamse Leeuw WWII General 3 May 1st, 2003 08:38 PM



Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2010, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.

Allies