|
|  |
 |
Members: 6,450
Threads: 18,400
Posts: 230,114
Online: 184
Newest Member:
jrhess3 |
|
|
| What If? Alternate History: Speculate about WWII battles that never were. Could the Axis have won? What if Hitler had the bomb? |

November 25th, 2003, 04:54 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 34
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
i was thinking, since a lot of people here ask if germany could have had the atomic bomb, where in the world would they drop it!?and with what aircraft, possibly the ME262?
[ 25. November 2003, 11:24 AM: Message edited by: SSGrenadier ]
|

November 25th, 2003, 05:15 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,836
Salute!: 98
Saluted 33 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
|
Hitler definitely hated this city so my guess is London....He had directed most V-1īs and V-2īs there and if possible heīd have sent the V-3īs to London as well.
Heīd use a special version of V-2 for the A-bomb, I think.
__________________
|

November 25th, 2003, 05:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Flanders
Posts: 844
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
It depends on how much bombs they had and when they would have had the bombs.
But maybe they would have used them on Moscow, London and places where a lot of troops were.
__________________
|

November 25th, 2003, 10:55 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,527
Salute!: 2
Saluted 24 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
I'll preface this by saying that I don't believe the Germans had a program in place to produce a nuclear weapon anywhere before the 1950's at the earliest, if even then.
But, to your question:
A 1945ish nuclear weapon weighed in at about 10,000 lbs for a Hiroshima type weapon. This eliminates about 95% of the aircraft the Germans had available as delivery systems. It also eliminates the V-1 and 2 as possible delivery systems.
What it leaves is a handful of one-off, prototype and, experimental heavy bombers and transports all of which would have been extremely vulnerable to Allied air defenses and would have had difficulty escaping their own weapon once delivered.
The bottom line is their most likely target, assuming they had such a weapon, would have to be close to the current front line of the Western Allies or, used against the Soviets where air defenses were less well developed. Either way the result would have almost certainly been singularly disappointing in terms of lasting effect.
|

November 25th, 2003, 11:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 34
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
perhaps you read my question wrong. i didnt ask what are the chances of having the a-bomb. i specificly asked where it would be DROPPED, and by what aircraft
with all due respect. [img]smile.gif[/img]
|

November 26th, 2003, 03:00 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,527
Salute!: 2
Saluted 24 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by SSGrenadier:
perhaps you read my question wrong. i didnt ask what are the chances of having the a-bomb. i specificly asked where it would be DROPPED, and by what aircraft
with all due respect. [img]smile.gif[/img]
|
Ok. I see only two choices the Germans would have that might work realistically. The first is using the only Ju 390 in existance (assuming it was still available). The second is converting a Ju 88 or 188 into a Mistel combination and delivering it that way. Those appear to be the only two means the Germans had to deliver something weighing in around 10,000 lbs.
In the case of the Ju 390 it would be very vulnerable to interception due to the weight causing speed and maneuverability problems. It also likely wouldn't survive the attack as its chances of escape are marginal at best (it's just too slow and cannot develop enough altitude to escape).
The Mistel would appear to be a better choice. If one assumes that it is used in the East, with a very experianced (in navigation particularly) pilot it stands an excellent chance of working. Likely targets include Moscow and Leningrad. Both were within the capabilities of some Mistel combinations to reach in late 44. It might even work in the West if the target chosen wasn't too deep into Allied controlled airspace like Antwerp.
Other than that, the Germans really haven't got any aircraft capable of lifting something as heavy as a early A-bomb. Certainly it is far beyond the capacity of anything they had in jet aircraft even on the drawing board.
|

November 26th, 2003, 01:23 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,836
Salute!: 98
Saluted 33 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Hereīs a nice little thingie A9/A10 rocket:
The A9/A10 was the world’s first practical design for a transatlantic ballistic missile. Design of the two stage missile began in 1940 and first flight would have been in 1946.
Work on the A9/A10 was prohibited after 1943 when all efforts were to be spent on perfection and production of the A4 as a weapon-in-being. Von Braun managed to continue some development and flight tests of the A9 under the cover name of A4b (i.e. a modification of the A4, and therefore a production-related project). In late 1944 work on the A9/A10 resumed under the code name Projekt Amerika, but no significant hardware development was possible after the last test of the A4b in January 1945. Payload: 1,000 kg. to a: 5,000 km range trajectory. Liftoff Thrust: 200,000 kgf. Liftoff Thrust: 2,000.00 kN. Total Mass: 85,300 kg. Core Diameter: 4.12 m. Total Length: 41.00 m. Maximum range: 5,000 km.
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/a9a10.htm
And more :
http://www.astronautix.com/lvfam/v2.htm
http://www.ufx.org/ghostrockets/a9.htm
From left -
standard V-2 (~280 km range);
winged A4b (~580 km range);
A10/A4b two-stage supersonic-glide missile (~2500 km range);
A10/A9 two-stage hypersonic-glide missile (~5000 km range)

__________________
|

November 28th, 2003, 12:09 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,527
Salute!: 2
Saluted 24 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Kai-Petri:
Hereīs a nice little thingie A9/A10 rocket:
The A9/A10 was the world’s first practical design for a transatlantic ballistic missile. Design of the two stage missile began in 1940 and first flight would have been in 1946.
|
With a more detailed study of the A9/A10 one finds that the Germans would not have gotten the latter into testing until the mid 50's if at all. The A10 due to poor design in airframe in particular was far heavier and larger than most 1950's ICBM's like the Titan.
The winged versions of the A4 also proved unflyable. This was due in large part to the poorly understood characteristics of supersonic flight at the time.
The Germans faced some daunting problems in getting the A10 into operation. First, the current guidance systems where wholly inadequite for allowing the A10 any reasonable degree of accuracy. The V-2 /A4 had a CEP measured in miles. The A10 using the same system would have had a CEP measured in 10's of miles. It would literally have been sheer luck that it hit New York city rather than somewhere in the North Eastern US or Canada using that guidance system.
Then there are problems like the use of multiple stages, non-gimballed rocket motors, alcohol / LOX fuels versus more potent alternatives that likely were never going to be available (like gasoline / red fuming nitric acid as one example).
Due to the complexity, cost and, lack of experiance it would have been very lucky on the Germans part if an A10 flew before 1955 if at all. Also note that a major effort to put this missile into operational use on a large scale would have nearly bankrupted the Reich unless other programs were severly cut back. It is unlikely that Hitler would have allowed the already anemic panzer production to be reduced to produce a missile of questionable utility.
|

November 28th, 2003, 01:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 55
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I think a Russian target would have been favoured, probably Moscow, with Stalingrad a close second choice.
Means of delivery: Heinkel 277? Condor? Captured Lancaster? Special custom made aircraft?
|

December 1st, 2003, 10:39 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 15
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I think it would be London
|

December 1st, 2003, 01:34 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,836
Salute!: 98
Saluted 33 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Quote:
T.A.Gardner:
With a more detailed study of the A9/A10 one finds that the Germans would not have gotten the latter into testing until the mid 50's if at all.
|
Yes, Iīm sure you are correct but I didnīhave any knowledge of this kind of plans by the Germans earlier.I think just the fact that these were planned is quite interesting!
__________________
|

December 1st, 2003, 03:28 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,527
Salute!: 2
Saluted 24 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
No problem, Kai. It's just it seems there are any number of people that seem to have studied only the German technology in any detail and seem to have...a bias (not exactly the word I want but it will have to do)...towards their "stuff" being better than anyone else's.
I've had several tiring go 'rounds on the ballastic missile issue. The US, Britain and, the Soviets had missile development programs. The US one was fairly large scale too (they had the resources to allow this). It is just all three recognized the limitations of rockets and missiles as weapons unlike the Germans who wasted enormous resources on what was essentially a technological waste of time in the frame of reference of World War 2. It wears on you after a while.
|

December 21st, 2003, 04:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island New York USA
Posts: 16
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Paris ,after August 1944.
|

December 21st, 2003, 11:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 580
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Perhas on the gigantic army bulldozing its ay to Berlin; kill a lot of troops and show the world the might of the atom all at once.
__________________
"If your gonna buy the angel s**t, you might as well go for the zombie package as well."
-George Carlin
|

January 11th, 2004, 10:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Romania
Posts: 38
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
If Hitler had A-Bomb i think he had sended far from Germany - Russia.
The city is not important.
The social impact over world is important.
__________________
|==================|
| Panzer Mechanism |====
|==================|
|

January 12th, 2004, 03:42 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 81
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
New york City-Think about it the US would then sue for peace!!! And droped by there Flying wing arcraft(forgot name).
__________________
Goto wwiif.cjb.net for a new wwii forum.
|

January 12th, 2004, 10:47 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,572
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I saw that plane on the History Channel last night!Looks familiar,does'nt it? Would it cross the Atlantic or mount pontoons on it so it could be refueled by a U boat? Framert.
__________________
|

January 13th, 2004, 01:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 81
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
I believe it could cross the adlantic!
__________________
Goto wwiif.cjb.net for a new wwii forum.
|

January 13th, 2004, 03:56 PM
|
 |
Drill Instructor 
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 4,723
Salute!: 20
Saluted 49 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
|
Had they built it, I am sure Hitler would have used it against the allied capitol cities. His generals would want it used in the field.
__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!
|

January 13th, 2004, 11:13 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,527
Salute!: 2
Saluted 24 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Alpha_Cluster:
New york City-Think about it the US would then sue for peace!!! And droped by there Flying wing arcraft(forgot name).
|
Yea, that's the ticket! Drop a non-existant nuclear weapon using a non-existant aircraft that lacks the capacity and range to do this and the US simply folds......right.....
Maybe the Germans could load it on a V-2 on a submersible towed cannister behind a U-boat and fire it from just off the US coast. Wait, the U-boat needs modification to include a LOX plant and storage facility along with being able to store the necessary hydrazine and alcohol. And, we will have to add a special electrical system to charge up the missile's batteries. Oh,oh, and add.....well you get the idea.
|

January 14th, 2004, 12:42 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,572
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
How about one of those Zepplins?Well, unless it springs a leak.FramerT.
__________________
|

January 14th, 2004, 08:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 81
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Hay i herd it on the history chyannal!
__________________
Goto wwiif.cjb.net for a new wwii forum.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|