|
|  |
 |
Members: 4,317
Threads: 15,303
Posts: 191,550
Online: 269
Newest Member:
norwaypegasus |
|
|
| What If? Alternate History: Speculate about WWII battles that never were. Could the Axis have won? What if Hitler had the bomb? |

April 23rd, 2006, 10:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 75
|
|
Hi,If you were a German general in mid 1943 in command of the whole eastern army what plans would you use to slow down the SU advance.? [img]graemlins/tiger.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/stugg.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/panzer.gif[/img]
|

April 24th, 2006, 06:41 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: thats a good question!
Posts: 634
|
|
i would retreat back and rienforce germanys border, as i would be willing to sacrifice new lands to keep my homeland
__________________
"Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." -Winston Churchill
|

April 24th, 2006, 07:15 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa Valley
Posts: 333
|
|
sue for peace and focus on the West
__________________

Facta non verba. "Deeds, not words"
|

April 24th, 2006, 07:18 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: thats a good question!
Posts: 634
|
|
that makes since, because you have less area to conquer in the west...
__________________
"Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." -Winston Churchill
|

April 24th, 2006, 10:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 75
|
|
True true but why did the Germans even want to invade SU when they could of used France for space.
|

April 24th, 2006, 11:06 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: thats a good question!
Posts: 634
|
|
you could have taken a majority of the west anyway such as france....in my opinion, the leadership got to hitlers head, and he thought he oculd take over russia....not going to happen, and not worth it my opinion. plenty enough in the west...
__________________
"Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." -Winston Churchill
|

April 25th, 2006, 12:53 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 366
|
|
Not follow through with Kursk.
__________________
|

April 25th, 2006, 01:04 PM
|
|
Dishonorably Discharged
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 523
|
|
Retreat all troops to the gates of Berlin
And the SU will suffer the bloodiest defeat in the history of man.
The dream of Hitler will be fulfilled
|

April 25th, 2006, 02:19 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 2,706
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Machine Gun Nest 1985.:
True true but why did the Germans even want to invade SU
|
Hitler wanted living space for his vision of a greater German Reich the seeds lay in Hitler’s book, Mein Kamf only a dream at this stage in Hitler's life. Latter on when Hitler came to power the dream came real, only to turn in to a nightmare. The great gambler had played out his last big gamble and lost.
As to you’re your question there only one answer, kill Hitler and end the war on all fronts.
By the way I don’t recommend reading Mein Kamf. I found it to be long winded and a very droll book, what do you expect from the ramblings of a mad man.
__________________
Regards, Richard

There back this Xmas 2008
|

April 26th, 2006, 07:08 AM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 8,953
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Machine Gun Nest 1985.:
True true but why did the Germans even want to invade SU when they could of used France for space.
|
Fair point but what Germany really needed was oil from the Caucasus. Their lack of control over the sea lanes made oil their Achilles heel.
Lebensraum means something more than its literal translation in English - it's more than just 'space to live', it can also mean 'space to achieve their ambitions'.
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

April 26th, 2006, 08:43 AM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 13,254
|
|
Yes,
the big areas were meant to be given to the loyal Germans especially from SS as ranches where subhumans ( those that were seen as valuable servants;others would be terminated ) would do the work and aryans would live and prosper and lead.
__________________
|

April 26th, 2006, 08:24 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 5,947
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Martin Bull:
Fair point but what Germany really needed was oil from the Caucasus. Their lack of control over the sea lanes made oil their Achilles heel.
|
They thought they needed the oil from Caucasus!
Two points to ponder:
- it would be feasible to increase synthetic oil production (assuming it could be protected from bombig);
- *if* they could get to the oilfields it would be an enormous effort and time taken to extract useful quantities (even if the wells were not sabotaged) due to lack of German oil extraction know-how (no technical base);
- assuming they managed to extract useful quantities, it would be a problem bringing the oil home all the way from the Caucasus. No pipelines extant, few or no rail-links to the Caucasus, whatever rail network there would be would already be clogged with military traffic. This might be achieved, but due to the time and effort this would require, only after a hypothetical German victory.
That makes three points, not two
As a practical example of all this, see Hitler's obsession with the Donbass mines. He went to great lengths to maintain possession and after all the effort only marginal amounts of manganese came out of it, possibly only from the extracted mineral stockpile. Why would it be better with the oil?
|

April 26th, 2006, 09:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 75
|
|
The vast amount of oil that Germany used in 41 invaded Russian and covering 1000 miles must of put a dent in their oil supplies.I cant believe that just 1 panzer did over 1 gallon of petrol per mile if you times that by the amount of tanks and miles thats alot of oil needed.It would be intersting to work that out if any one knows the precise figures then please reply.
|

April 27th, 2006, 02:34 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 366
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by JTF-2:
sue for peace and focus on the West
|
Attention was turned to the West. A bad move I'd say. If Hitler had devoted all of his attention to the East perhaps he could have held off Soviet forces long enough to let the Western forces take Germany. Without a doubt, many Germans - soldiers and civilians alike - would have been spared from the Soviet invasion.
I think Hitler stayed away from this plan because to follow through with this one must accept that defeat is innevitable. I know his intentions were to defeat the West so he could focus completely on the East. Very foolish that he thought he could prevail against the West, especially after a strong foothold was established in France.
__________________
|

April 27th, 2006, 11:41 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 75
|
|
yes but if Hitler turned his back from Russia then its likely that the Russians would get to Berlin much faster by the time the Germans defeated the west.
|

April 27th, 2006, 11:48 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 5,947
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Machine Gun Nest 1985.:
The vast amount of oil that Germany used in 41 invaded Russian and covering 1000 miles must of put a dent in their oil supplies.I cant believe that just 1 panzer did over 1 gallon of petrol per mile if you times that by the amount of tanks and miles thats alot of oil needed.It would be intersting to work that out if any one knows the precise figures then please reply.
|
If you want to do your own sums, a PzIV guzzled 300lt/100km.
|

April 27th, 2006, 10:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 75
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Za Rodinu:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Machine Gun Nest 1985.:
The vast amount of oil that Germany used in 41 invaded Russian and covering 1000 miles must of put a dent in their oil supplies.I cant believe that just 1 panzer did over 1 gallon of petrol per mile if you times that by the amount of tanks and miles thats alot of oil needed.It would be intersting to work that out if any one knows the precise figures then please reply.
|
If you want to do your own sums, a PzIV guzzled 300lt/100km. </font>[/quote]what about the other kinds of tanks in the German army in 41.
|

April 28th, 2006, 02:41 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 366
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Machine Gun Nest 1985.:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Za Rodinu:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Machine Gun Nest 1985.:
The vast amount of oil that Germany used in 41 invaded Russian and covering 1000 miles must of put a dent in their oil supplies.I cant believe that just 1 panzer did over 1 gallon of petrol per mile if you times that by the amount of tanks and miles thats alot of oil needed.It would be intersting to work that out if any one knows the precise figures then please reply.
|
If you want to do your own sums, a PzIV guzzled 300lt/100km. </font>[/quote]what about the other kinds of tanks in the German army in 41. </font>[/quote]The panzer IV was the workhorse and primary battle tank of the German Army in 1941.
__________________
|

April 28th, 2006, 09:15 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 5,947
|
|
Sorry, it wasn't, it was the PzIII as the Pz IV F2 (the first long gun version) only started coming on service in March'42.
|

April 29th, 2006, 06:22 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: War
Posts: 88
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Ironcross:
Retreat all troops to the gates of Berlin
And the SU will suffer the bloodiest defeat in the history of man.
The dream of Hitler will be fulfilled
|
very unlikely. Even if the russians were beaten at Berlin doesnt mean they will not win the next battle.
|

April 29th, 2006, 01:01 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 5,947
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Miller:
Not follow through with Kursk.
|
Possibly but not enough, we need longer answers or else we are simply left hanging. Instead of Kursk then what? What is your alternative?
|

April 30th, 2006, 07:27 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Citizen of the world, though quite misantropic!
Posts: 6,393
|
|
You're all forgetting that the 'Lebensraum' strategy involved not only the acquisition of the 'living space' for the German race, it also involved the annihilation of the 'perverted Bolshevik-Jewish ideology of communism' and of the Jewish race (let's remember that, at the time, more than half of the world's Jews lived in Poland, the Ukraine, Russia and all over eastern Europe) and the enslavement of the sub-human Slavs.
The Soviet State would disappear, as well as the Jews. The Slavs would then be turn into a brute mass of illitarate slaves who would do the hard work until the Arian colonisers would be millions and millions enough to populate the vastness of the east, thus becoming slave workers unnecessary and the very existance of the sub-humans usless.
Himmler himself said so: 'The invasion of the East involves killing over 40 million Slavs'.
__________________
"War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." - Jean Dutourd, French veteran of both world wars
"A mon fils: depuis que tes yeux sont fermes les miens n’ont cessé de pleurir." - Mère française, Verdun
|

April 30th, 2006, 09:35 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 366
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Za Rodinu:
Sorry, it wasn't, it was the PzIII as the Pz IV F2 (the first long gun version) only started coming on service in March'42.
|
I thought it was the Panzer IV D with the short 75mm gun. I'm probably thinking a little too early, '39-'40 maybe. Those would have been ripped apart by T-34's.
Quote:
Originally posted by Za Rodinu:
Possibly but not enough, we need longer answers or else we are simply left hanging. Instead of Kursk then what? What is your alternative?
|
Honestly, I have no idea. I don't think I would ever make a good general. What I do know was that the Soviets knew Kursk was coming and they were ready for it. Hitler knew this and followed through with Citadel anyway.
__________________
|

May 1st, 2006, 02:58 AM
|
|
| |