Axis

Members: 6,450
Threads: 18,400
Posts: 230,109
Online: 232

Newest Member:
jrhess3

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > General Discussion > What If?
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


What If? Alternate History: Speculate about WWII battles that never were. Could the Axis have won? What if Hitler had the bomb?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old October 8th, 2006, 07:31 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 394
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ali Morshead is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Churchill placed the Vichy Navy in an unenviable situation.

In fear for what the French Fleet would do if the Germans attempted to sieze it, Churchill decided to gain its assistance in the Allied cause, beome Neutral, well away from Europe or to be sunk where they lay.

The Vichy chose to defy Churchill, and suffered heavy losses from Sea and Air bombardment.

What if???

In your opinions, what chances were there of the Vichy Navy chosing either
a) Join the Royal Navy
b) Demobilize and sail to the French West Indies ie Martinique
c) Demobilize and sail to a US port
d) Fight.

And if option b or c, what do you think would be the reaction if a U-Boat would see the British escort and accidently put a few torps into the Dunkerque ??
__________________
Whe're off to see the Wizard, the wonderful wizard of OZ - 6 Australian Infantry Div, Bardia January 1941
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old October 9th, 2006, 05:11 AM
T. A. Gardner's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,527
Salute!: 2
Saluted 24 Times in 19 Posts
T. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of lightT. A. Gardner is a glorious beacon of light
Post

The odds of anything but a situation ending in battle was almost inevidable. The French, under Admiral Gensoul, were not going to make a local decision. As the state of the French Admiralty in France was in flux it was impossible to reach Admiral Darlan for any decision (which likely would have been negative in any case).
The British under Admiral Somerville became less and less patient with the French and finally simply made threats.
Since the French across the board where not interned in a British or neutral port generally refused to surrender or demobilize on their own it is unlikely that a major force such as was at mers el Kebir would simply acquess to any demands made of them by the British. A fight was inevidable.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old October 10th, 2006, 10:17 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 394
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ali Morshead is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Thanks TAG.

I was hoping someone would have some fanciful theory on how the Vichy navy would accept asylum in either Martinique or the USA.

In doing so a UBoat would sink Dunkerque and so inflame Vichy hatred for the Germans that the US and Brits could "walk in" to French North Africa.

I am trying to link a British capture of Tripolitania in April 1941 with an Invasion of France in 1943.
__________________
Whe're off to see the Wizard, the wonderful wizard of OZ - 6 Australian Infantry Div, Bardia January 1941
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2006, 08:45 AM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,836
Salute!: 98
Saluted 33 Times in 29 Posts
Kai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of light
Post

If the Vichy government could not handle its position close to "neutral" IŽd think Adolf would invade the country. So losing the fleet otherwise than by "fighting" would probably mean Germans entering the rest of France in my opinion. Only low number of troops available would stop Hitler from doing that.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old October 11th, 2006, 10:46 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 394
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ali Morshead is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

So in June 40 with the Wermacht taking a short breather after clearing the Atlantic Coast they would have just kept on heading south?

In April 1941 with Marita & Barbarossa maybe things would be a little different, I'll have to re-think a bit.
__________________
Whe're off to see the Wizard, the wonderful wizard of OZ - 6 Australian Infantry Div, Bardia January 1941
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old October 30th, 2006, 09:22 AM
chocapic's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 698
Salute!: 6
Saluted 3 Times in 3 Posts
chocapic Is actually quite decentchocapic Is actually quite decent
Post

many of the prominent members of the Vichy regime were not so bad oriented towards Germany, than against allies.

I think there was little chances for a good decision or compromise, and the allies could not make such a gamble.

IMHO they made the good decision.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old October 30th, 2006, 10:12 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 394
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ali Morshead is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

For Allies, read the British.

Just finished The Vichy Regime 1940-44 by Robert Aron & Georgette Elgey, yes, there appears that some arrangement could have been cobbled together. Iff they had the time which in July 1940 didnt exsist.

One of Darlan's gripes is that the Brits didnt believe him, when he said the Fleet would never be taken by the Germans or Italians.
__________________
Whe're off to see the Wizard, the wonderful wizard of OZ - 6 Australian Infantry Div, Bardia January 1941
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old October 30th, 2006, 11:03 AM
chocapic's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 698
Salute!: 6
Saluted 3 Times in 3 Posts
chocapic Is actually quite decentchocapic Is actually quite decent
Post

Again, Darlan was an anglophobic prick.

since the end of June, the Anglo French relations degraded seriously (for obvious reasons).

Of course, things could have gone smoother, like in Alexandria I believe, but the Brits had many reasons to believe Darlan was not sincere and was just buying time (anyway, at this time, he was convinced that it was now UK's turn to fall to Germany).

Later on, when Darlan spoke against the Toulon French fleet to fall into German hands, he was not in charge anymore.

He was in Alger in november 1942, to visit his dying son, and got captured by the insurgent who made a putsch to prepare Torch landing.

Even at this moment, he managed to send 2 messages to the Naval HQ in Alger (not under resistance's control at this time) ordering to oppose to the Allies. One of these messages, written by his hand, still exists.

This is only on the 10th and 11th of november that he will order to cease fire, while he was under US custody, after hundreds casualties both French and allied.

Such a man was clearly hard to trust, back at the time of Mers El Kebir.

[ 30. October 2006, 07:58 AM: Message edited by: chocapic ]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Allies