Axis

Members: 5,156
Threads: 16,691
Posts: 207,113
Online: 146

Newest Member:
teejay

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > General Discussion > What If?
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


What If? Alternate History: Speculate about WWII battles that never were. Could the Axis have won? What if Hitler had the bomb?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old November 27th, 2006, 03:13 PM
JTF-2's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa Valley
Posts: 350
JTF-2 is on a distinguished road
Post

Hilter had a tough decision, on where to concentrate his interests. To go East, or to get the UK out of the mediterranean. Hitler's Generals wanted to do the latter, but Hitler wanted no part of it.

Do you think that this would of saved the german defeat or just postponed it.

and 2nd, do you think that they would of been able to capture Malta and Gibraltar?
__________________

Facta non verba. "Deeds, not words"
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old November 30th, 2006, 02:52 AM
Dishonorably Discharged
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 363
Roddoss72 is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

If Germany had gotten permission from Spanish President General Francisco Franco to allow six divisions (1 x Panzer, 4 x Infantry and 1 x Mountain)and subsequent air cover to transit through Spain they would have captured Gibraltar quite easily.

Malta is another thing all together, it would have been achieved but at a high cost but the Germans could not have done it alone the Italians would certainly have to provide ground troops and almost all logistical support.

But once those two objectives had been achieved one more target to secure the Mediterranean and that is Cyprus then once it is secured the Axis could use Cyprus as a marshalling point for a direct invasion of Egypt and the Suez Canal, this might have had the effect of a pro axis General Anwar Sedat staging a coup in Egypt.

Once Egypt is secured and the last of the British are out of the Mediterranean it could have swayed Spain, Norway and Vichy France into the Axis cause and this could have had a knock on effect of a coalition launching a massed invasion of Britain.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old November 30th, 2006, 06:12 AM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,025
Kai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really nice
Cool

Norway? The year must be 1939 then or early 1940?

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old November 30th, 2006, 02:20 PM
JTF-2's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa Valley
Posts: 350
JTF-2 is on a distinguished road
Post

That's what I was thinking Roddoss72 !!

It could of been a major flip of momentum for the Germans! With the UK out of the picture in the Mediterranean, it would of opened up another front to attack Mother Russia. It think it would of been the better of the 2 choices to do. If they had of done it that way, It could turn the tides of WW2 in favor of the Germans.
__________________

Facta non verba. "Deeds, not words"
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old November 30th, 2006, 03:10 PM
Sloniksp's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,468
Sloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the rough
It is amost common knowledge for most,that one of Hiltler's biggest blunders was going to war with Stalin before finishing with with U.K. ( second front )

Without a doubt, the war for Soviet Union would have been much harder then it already was. However saying that Hitler would have won sounds more of a " what if ". Since this has never happend all we are left with is speculation and obviously everyone is entitled to their own opinon.

My opinion is still no [img]graemlins/hsu.gif[/img] . Germany would have still lost, it would have just taken more time and lives to beat the invader back. Also I cant imagine the tide of war turning in favor of the Germans more then it already has in 41' to 42'.
What else could the Germans have done in Russia with the U.K. out of the war?? Throw in another 25 to 30 divisions??
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler

T-34/85
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old November 30th, 2006, 05:43 PM
JTF-2's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa Valley
Posts: 350
JTF-2 is on a distinguished road
Post

It will always be "no" for the germans! But MAYBE owning the Mediterranean in late 41 and early 42 could of fired events that you and wouldn't of thought possible. A weird example is that the UK strikes a "white peace" with Germany, or Spain gets forced into the Axis. I don't know..just saying "no" to something like this is to easy of an answer.
This is the "what if" Thread right?
__________________

Facta non verba. "Deeds, not words"
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old November 30th, 2006, 05:49 PM
T. A. Gardner's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,238
T. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really niceT. A. Gardner is just really nice
Post

One problem with Spain allowing the Germans to use their territory to launch an attack on Gibralter is that it implicates Spain. Spain would almost certainly end up at war with Britain as a result. This gives the Germans a new headache. Do they no invade Portugal to secure the coast and prevent its use as a staging area for the British? How much effort will be necessary to secure the Spanish coast against an Allied invasion?
Almost certainly on balance it is a negative outcome for Germany to involve Spain in the war.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old November 30th, 2006, 06:08 PM
Sloniksp's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,468
Sloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the rough
Post

Unless ofcourse Spain decided to invade Portugal


( My coment does not warrant a response )
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler

T-34/85
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old November 30th, 2006, 07:48 PM
Za Rodinu's Avatar
Ace
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where Iron Crosses grow
Posts: 6,850
Za Rodinu is a glorious beacon of lightZa Rodinu is a glorious beacon of lightZa Rodinu is a glorious beacon of lightZa Rodinu is a glorious beacon of lightZa Rodinu is a glorious beacon of lightZa Rodinu is a glorious beacon of lightZa Rodinu is a glorious beacon of light
Post

Portugal would be a walkover for anyone, but the consequence of an Iberian adventure would be the need to occupy two countries in very very weak economic condition - imagine Roumania without the oil - entirely dependent on an economy of subsistence and dependent on imports for oil and coal. One can live on sardines and olive oil (and octopus ) only up to a point, after that it's starvation.

Also remember that Spain was just out of a bloody civil war, there were alot of guns around, and for some reason the French invasions had caused what was called the Spanish Ulcer. Not a good idea. More troops required for occupation, a great coast to invade, more Atlantic Wall to be built.

Not worth it.
__________________
Seen inside the locker of a German colleague:
"I am a mushroom, I must be a mushroom because I'm kept in the dark and fed bullshit."
Another HC viewer, I s'pose
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old November 30th, 2006, 08:30 PM
Sloniksp's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,468
Sloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the rough
Post

I would agree

( even though I did say that my comment did not warrant a response )
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler

T-34/85
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old December 1st, 2006, 03:11 AM
Dishonorably Discharged
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 363
Roddoss72 is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Sloniksp:
It is amost common knowledge for most,that one of Hiltler's biggest blunders was going to war with Stalin before finishing with with U.K. ( second front )

Without a doubt, the war for Soviet Union would have been much harder then it already was. However saying that Hitler would have won sounds more of a " what if ". Since this has never happend all we are left with is speculation and obviously everyone is entitled to their own opinon.

My opinion is still no [img]graemlins/hsu.gif[/img] . Germany would have still lost, it would have just taken more time and lives to beat the invader back. Also I cant imagine the tide of war turning in favor of the Germans more then it already has in 41' to 42'.
What else could the Germans have done in Russia with the U.K. out of the war?? Throw in another 25 to 30 divisions??
In fact Germany at the time of Operation Overlord had 145 divisions serving other than on the Eastern Front, could you imagine an additional 145 divisions against the Soviets, this could have been done had the Germans and Axis forces had carried out a combined invasion of Britain in 1940. Oh and to enlighten you this is a "What If" section of the Forum site if you did not know that already.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old December 1st, 2006, 04:54 PM
Sloniksp's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,468
Sloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the rough
Post

At the time of planned Overlord Germany had more divison on the west then the east. After the invasion was called of. More then 3 million German troops were then sent to the easter front for operation Babarossa. Keep in mind that if U.K. fell Germany would still need to keep troops on the island in case of resistance, just like in France and other countries not to mention in Africa.

Here is a chart of German devisions in the war.

http://www.axishistory.com/index.php?id=7288

notice the emmediate increase of troops in the East by late 41' till the end.

This site is provided by none other then our very own Von Poop!! [img]graemlins/hsu.gif[/img]
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler

T-34/85
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old December 2nd, 2006, 10:24 AM
Jaeger's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 732
Jaeger has a spectacular aura aboutJaeger has a spectacular aura about
Post

Norway could not have been 'swayed' to the Axis cause. I think that both Spain and Vichy would refuse too.

The voulenteers in the Legion and the Waffen SS divisions was promised to fight in Finland against the USSR.

There is no way that the Norwegians would 'fahren gegen Engeland'.

Spain was ravaged after a bitter civil war, and Vichy was no coherent country.

The three countries could only supply voulenteers. (wich they all did anyways)

A massive navy to overcome the British Navy, and extra aircraft to win Air Superiority was not within the power of these nations.

A vaste.
__________________
'We march. The enemy is retreating in transport. We follow on foot.' Lt.Neil McCallum 5/7 Gordons 19th November 1942
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old December 2nd, 2006, 01:26 PM
Seadog's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 335
Seadog is on a distinguished road
Post

Hitler winning the war would have more to do with small decisions than the big ones. Not going against Russia was a major decision that should have been made. Small decisions like developing and producing bombers and fighters with enough range to be effective against Britain, not bombing London and staying focused on the munition factories, developing landing craft, and hundreds of other choices that could have made a difference.
__________________
Lord, let me be the person my dog thinks I am.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old December 11th, 2006, 07:23 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: utah
Posts: 918
chromeboomerang is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Mtns between Spain & France is all the "atlantic wall" they would need. Advantages outweigh disadvantages. Portugal offers many good ports for German navy. & extra airbases to keep British navy at bay.

Not to mention the vehicles & drainable fuel.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Allies