|
|  |
 |
Members: 4,296
Threads: 15,279
Posts: 191,258
Online: 138
Newest Member:
Powder |
|
|
| What If? Alternate History: Speculate about WWII battles that never were. Could the Axis have won? What if Hitler had the bomb? |

June 9th, 2007, 03:00 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,344
|
|
A what if, for the Russians
Stalin decides in an early phaseout of T-26s, BTs and the light tank junk, so in Barbarossa instead of 20,000 shitty tanks the Wehrmacht is faced with 10,000 T-34s.......
As much as I enjoy this " what if " I can only take credit for the copy and paste as someone else has already brought this up. 
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler
|

June 9th, 2007, 03:22 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,553
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Germany would have never got close to Moscow.
|

June 9th, 2007, 05:36 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Winnipeg - Canada
Posts: 636
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Instead of hundreds of miles... a few feet  Kidding.
__________________
Time is only enemy you'll never get rid of.
|

June 9th, 2007, 07:49 PM
|
 |
Good Ol' Boy 
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Deep in the Heart of Dixie
Posts: 3,814
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Without an accompanying change in strategy, that is hard to really say with any certainty. After the realization that their "stand and fight where you are" theory resulted in huge losses, the Soviets adopted a more flexible approach to warfare.
Perhaps German encirclements of the Soviets would have been less involved or their abilities to breakout greater. It guess it would depend on the Soviet supply situations following an encirclement. An immobile tank due to fuel starvation is very vulnerable, even if it is a T-34.
I read somewhere of the the German's shock at encountering their first T-34. They were finally able to stop its rampage after landing a 105mm HE shell into it's rear.
__________________
Best Regards,
JW
Flag of the State of Alabama
|

June 9th, 2007, 08:02 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 671
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloniksp
Stalin decides in an early phaseout of T-26s, BTs and the light tank junk, so in Barbarossa instead of 20,000 shitty tanks the Wehrmacht is faced with 10,000 T-34s.......
|
Nothing would have changed, the Red Army would still have been freezed in its track in front of Berlin during winter 41. 
__________________
Police cars carry three agents. The first one can read, the second one can write and the third one keeps watch on those dangerous intellectuals.
Unknown subversive activist - 20th century.
|

June 9th, 2007, 08:24 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 13,244
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
With all the T-34īs Stalin would have won the Winter War and Hitler would not have attacked the USSR...
Oops. Did I spoil it?

__________________
|

June 9th, 2007, 11:21 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,553
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Nothing like a big boost in confidence[ala Stalingrad]in stopping the "happy feet." Germany had very little to stop a T-34 early on. The Soviets,knowing they had a worthy tank, would'nt have been that scared of the approaching Germans.IMO.
|

June 9th, 2007, 11:50 PM
|
|
Dishonorably Discharged
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 91
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Although I believe he was actually trying to retool as fast as he could anyways, I agree, the Germans would've been stopped alot shorter.
Though keep in mind that at this point the Germans weren't winning so much because of tank quality, but of organization and tactics. And of course some air superiority.
I wonder, given what Guderian yelled at Hitler over his eye-witness of the T34 and KvI(or was it Model?)...if I recall correctly, the report of the T34/KvI alone was cause for some German generals to suggest to Hitler that the Germans be more cautious and maybe hold and consolidate and try to force Stalin to accept terms.
One of my favourite tanks.
Nice, round, smooth lines, low and sleek...hmmm, going to go kiss a woman now  .
|

June 10th, 2007, 04:04 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Winnipeg - Canada
Posts: 636
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
now only if there was a "what if" that if Russian's had Tigers 
__________________
Time is only enemy you'll never get rid of.
|

June 10th, 2007, 10:41 AM
|
|
Dishonorably Discharged
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 91
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Would they call it a Bear?
sorry host, off topic.
|

June 12th, 2007, 06:58 AM
|
|
Dishonorably Discharged
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 363
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Initially German success, but a complete rout by Soviets on the Germans, most probably a German defeat by 1943.
Regards.
|

November 21st, 2007, 02:48 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 477
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Nearly all the Soviet tanks lost in the opening months were lost due to badly trained crews, inept tactical leaders, chaotic operational leadership, and a blundering strategy from the top. A logistics sytem that frequently collapsed helped as well. The same regiments that lost their tanks due to wrong orders, failed fuel deliverys, untrained gunners, ect... will lose them whatever model they are.
The Britsh & French had tanks with better armor and better guns than the Germans in 1940, but were still defeated. Why should the worse prepared Soviet Army do better just because it has a different tank?
|

November 21st, 2007, 07:13 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 5,933
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl W Schwamberger
Nearly all the Soviet tanks lost in the opening months were lost due to badly trained crews, inept tactical leaders, chaotic operational leadership, and a blundering strategy from the top. A logistics sytem that frequently collapsed helped as well. The same regiments that lost their tanks due to wrong orders, failed fuel deliverys, untrained gunners, ect... will lose them whatever model they are.
The Britsh & French had tanks with better armor and better guns than the Germans in 1940, but were still defeated. Why should the worse prepared Soviet Army do better just because it has a different tank?
|
You put up a good argument. All I can reply is that most of the outmoded fleet (BT, T-37, T-40, T-26, etc etc) besides being inherently useless (or as useful as the PzII and early PzIII) already had a lot of mileage in them so were all potential junkheaps.
The T-34s, being new construction, would at least have lasted a bit more, and even if not perfect (which they weren't) would be a bit tougher than the other speed bumps.
We have all the anedoctal evidence of the 37mm PaK (and KwK) becoming useless overnight when faced with T-34, so a fleet of these instead of the previous mishmash must have had some effect.
|

November 21st, 2007, 08:30 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,344
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
ALIVE!!! ITS ALLLLIVEEEEE!!!!
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler
|

November 22nd, 2007, 03:19 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 5,933
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
What's alive, Kulak?
|

November 22nd, 2007, 04:57 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 370
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloniksp
Stalin decides in an early phaseout of T-26s, BTs and the light tank junk, so in Barbarossa instead of 20,000 shitty tanks the Wehrmacht is faced with 10,000 T-34s.......
As much as I enjoy this " what if " I can only take credit for the copy and paste as someone else has already brought this up. 
|
Initially the Soviets would still be routed. It is one thing to have 10,000 T-34/76 it is another to have the effective leadership on the battlefield to use them, and at this stage the Germans had complete superiorority over the Soviets but one factor that the Panther might have come into effect earlier at least a year earlier. But whatever the result Germany was doomed either way.
|

November 22nd, 2007, 07:29 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,344
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Quote:
Originally Posted by Za Rodinu
What's alive, Kulak?
|
Oh no, even in this thread I think that he was a goner
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rundstedt
Initially the Soviets would still be routed. It is one thing to have 10,000 T-34/76 it is another to have the effective leadership on the battlefield to use them, and at this stage the Germans had complete superiorority over the Soviets but one factor that the Panther might have come into effect earlier at least a year earlier. But whatever the result Germany was doomed either way.
|
In the early stages of the Ost Front, where-ever the T-34 showed its face, the German advace slowed. Even with the superior German leadership in the beginning, how much would the German leadership might be able to accomplish with its 3,500 absolete Panzers against 10k T-34's?
Where about the Panther?
I love a Soviet "What if " 
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler
|

November 23rd, 2007, 11:00 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 477
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Still not impressed. Production of all thsoe t34 assumes it was designed a couple years earlier, or that accelerated production occurs. (most likely both). In either case the mechanical problems of the earlier tanks apply to the t34s & in the case of accelerated production are worse.
The training problem must be accounted for. One of the reasons for the sucess of the t34 equippe regiments in 1941 is that they usually included the better trained leaders and crews. Some were made up of the training staff of the school unit. So these were not your average July 1941 tank regiment.
My small study of the Wehrmachts supply problems of June thru Dec 1941 suggests slowing down a couple weeks might be better anyway.
|

November 23rd, 2007, 05:31 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 2,702
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Hitler did say in 1942 if he knew the Russians had that many tanks he would had thought twice about invading, so it may have been the case in this What If Hitler may have put the whole thing on hold.
__________________
Regards, Richard

"Welcome to my new Empire,Doctor."
|

November 23rd, 2007, 07:40 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,344
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
He did indeed, but then again this only was the case after the Wehrmacht came head to head with the tanks. Could Hitler have known or believed the number of Soviet tanks before actually coming face to face with them?
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler
|

November 26th, 2007, 11:21 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
With all the T-34īs Stalin would have won the Winter War and Hitler would not have attacked the USSR...
Oops. Did I spoil it?
---------------------------
hey, just to comment on your msg, i dont really think the Russians lost the witer war due to the poor quality of their tanks they used, as the Finns had no heavy tanks of there own or large scale armoured fighting or any air power of note.
it was there hit and run tactics, ski troops and knowledge of the terrain coupled with very poor Soviet tactics and operational thinking which ruined their campaign.
|

November 26th, 2007, 11:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 370
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
One aspect that has not being covered and that is air superiorority, if we assume that the Soviet Red Air Force is effectively wiped out in the first 24 hours of Operation Barbarossa within the west then we have so many T-34/76's running around without air protection, making them vulnerable to air attack and also deployment how are these tanks are to be deployed spread along the front, meaning we have one tank per 200 metres or massed.
More to come.
|

November 26th, 2007, 11:34 PM
|
|
Dishonorably Discharged
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 523
|
|
Re: A what if, for the Russians
Good news for the Germans indeed, as they would have had tanks(captured) that could actually move and fire at the gate of Moscow.
Unlike the Germans, the Russians didn't use their tanks in large formations, which made them easy meat for the Anti-Tank guns.
|
|