|
|  |
 |
Members: 4,555
Threads: 15,625
Posts: 195,322
Online: 148
Newest Member:
GregP |
|
|
| What If? Alternate History: Speculate about WWII battles that never were. Could the Axis have won? What if Hitler had the bomb? |

August 29th, 2007, 10:50 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 111
|
|
Did they really need a rescue?
Now, I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I can't find it, and I'm not THAT knowledge on the area of where the combat took place. But:
Would the 101st Airborne survived in Bastogne if Patton had not come with his armored support?
Would the 101st have held out? What was Hitler attacking with? Or would they have been obviously annahilated?
Anyone who can help me determine this would be appreciated.
(P.S. To be true to the Paratroops, I "feel" that they didn't need to be "rescued").
__________________
|

August 29th, 2007, 11:26 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 4,075
|
|
Re: Did they really need a rescue?
I think if the paras were kept supplied, they could have held out. The Germans could not attack Bastogne and move ahead at the same time. Patton's counterattack achieved two things, it put pressure on the German's left flank, threatening to cut them off and secondly, after the withdrawal of the German forces, relieved the paras.
Now, the soldiers in the pocket could not have held out much longer had the weather not broken and allowed supply drops. I don't know what kind of heavy weapons they had but it would not have been enough to hold out for much longer. My opinion at this point.
__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!
|

August 29th, 2007, 11:59 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,071
|
|
Re: Did they really need a rescue?
The answer is yes. The 101 was not alone in Bastogne. There were substancial reminants of the 28th Division and the 9th Armored Division there along with numerous corps and army level units of various sorts that had collected in the vicinity as the US fell back during the initial German advance. Of these, there were several battalions of artillery including 155mm howitzers and guns that were among the corps level units that got pocketted.
These guns were able to fire on virtually any point on the defense perimeter and, as US artillery usually was able to do when well coordinated it smashed attack after attack. Once the US was able to supply the surrounded units by air the Germans were finished.
A big difference in the air supply situation between Bastogne and Arnheim was that the 101 had few difficulties with their communications equipment and in particular their all-important Rebecca transmitters. These allowed C-47 aircraft to pinpoint drop sites with incredible accuracy ensuring that almost everything dropped ended up in Allied hands. At Arnheim the British lost 5 of 6 drop sites when they were either overrun or the Rebecca transmitters failed to operate.
Even if the weather was poor with this equipment air drops were still possible if the airfields the aircraft were flying out of had reasonable weather at them.
|

August 30th, 2007, 12:46 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 4,075
|
|
Re: Did they really need a rescue?
Thanks Terry, and I agree that the Germans were finished once the weather broke. If there was no surrounded troops, I believe that Patton would still have marched north and attacked the German's flank. As we all know, Patton was persistent and usually found a way to implement his plans. Thanks for the info.
__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!
|

August 30th, 2007, 02:43 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 803
|
|
Re: Did they really need a rescue?
Maybe.
The Americans had a strong point in Bastogne that would have taken a concerted effort to destroy, several minor attacks were launched but none to the scale required to crush the resistance. This was because the effort was made elsewhere, hoping that the lack of supplies and attrition would soften the resistance. Don't get me wrong it was not easy being in Bastogne, and attacks were made daily, some with armor, others with out.
Dont think that any single parachute division withstood this by themselves, part of the 101st was the 463rd para artillery that gave a good accounting of themselves, in direct fire positions. TheHistoryNet | World War II | World War II: 463rd Parachute Field Artillery Battalion in the Battle of Bastogne
Remnants of the 687th field artillery battalion where also there as well as parts of armored divisions. Supplies were important and needed to be dropped for those able to fight to fight. But had the Germans wanted to crush the pocket without regard for other objectives they could have. As to the saving ... that is opinion.
__________________
"Well, I don't believe that climate change is just an issue that's convenient to bring up during a campaign. I believe it's one of the greatest moral challenges of our generation."
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/energy/
 Barack Obama
|

August 30th, 2007, 10:27 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 248
|
|
Re: Did they really need a rescue?
The father of a friend of mine and also one of my teachers was with the 101st at Bastogne. I remember him saying something to the effect that once he knew Patton was on the way he was pretty sure they'd make it. or words to that effect. Now if they'd waited for Monty ....
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:43 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |