Axis

Members: 5,680
Threads: 17,395
Posts: 216,755
Online: 291

Newest Member:
rwelch1874

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > General Discussion > What If?
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


What If? Alternate History: Speculate about WWII battles that never were. Could the Axis have won? What if Hitler had the bomb?

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools
  #51 (permalink)  
Old November 5th, 2007, 06:57 AM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,446
Salute!: 43
Saluted 14 Times in 13 Posts
Kai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really nice
Default Re: US on the left and Brits on the right

well, we´ve seen some threads putting the main panzer force in the US zone and as well this helps in putting that option away. As well it was not all true what Monty said that he managed to keep the panzers in his area by his actions. We know there were some other reasons as well. Right? and again just my opinion....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old November 27th, 2007, 06:31 AM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,136
Salute!: 2
Saluted 6 Times in 5 Posts
Martin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of light
Arrow Re: US on the left and Brits on the right

Many books seem to mention that the British/Canadians faced heavier German armoured opposition in Normandy following the lodgement phase than did the US Forces - but the extent of the difference is rarely mentioned.

I was interested to note while reading Buckley's 'British Armour In The Normandy Campaign' that by 25th July the British/Canadian front faced five SS and three Wehrmacht Panzer Divisions, plus the three heavy Tiger Battalions ; the US Forces faced two Panzer Divisions.
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old November 27th, 2007, 10:47 AM
Jaeger's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 743
Salute!: 6
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Jaeger Is actually quite decentJaeger Is actually quite decent
Default Re: US on the left and Brits on the right

Regarding the Panzers in the British/Commonwealth area. Rommel himself complained that the pressure applied by the allied forces denied him to replace his panzer in the frontline with regular infantry. Rommels plan called for bringing the Panzers out of the line and deploy them en masse for a counterattack.

How practical this would have been or successful remains a 'what if', but it is clear from Rommels point of view that the tactic used by the allies denied Rommel to fight the battle as he wanted. (for better or for worse)
__________________
'We march. The enemy is retreating in transport. We follow on foot.' Lt.Neil McCallum 5/7 Gordons 19th November 1942
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old November 27th, 2007, 02:11 PM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,446
Salute!: 43
Saluted 14 Times in 13 Posts
Kai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really nice
Default Re: US on the left and Brits on the right

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Bull View Post
Many books seem to mention that the British/Canadians faced heavier German armoured opposition in Normandy following the lodgement phase than did the US Forces - but the extent of the difference is rarely mentioned.

I was interested to note while reading Buckley's 'British Armour In The Normandy Campaign' that by 25th July the British/Canadian front faced five SS and three Wehrmacht Panzer Divisions, plus the three heavy Tiger Battalions ; the US Forces faced two Panzer Divisions.
Got any figures what the Germans had in operational use? I mean they did not get much to cover their losses while the Allied could lose several and replace them instantly. Thanx!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old November 27th, 2007, 02:13 PM
Martin Bull's Avatar
Acting Wg. Cdr.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,136
Salute!: 2
Saluted 6 Times in 5 Posts
Martin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of lightMartin Bull is a glorious beacon of light
Thumbs up Re: US on the left and Brits on the right

Good point, Kai - I'll have to read some more to try to find an answer to that....
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old November 27th, 2007, 03:07 PM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,446
Salute!: 43
Saluted 14 Times in 13 Posts
Kai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really niceKai-Petri is just really nice
Default Re: US on the left and Brits on the right

No problem, Martin!

Sometimes there are some interesting extra points in the books by the veterans.

Like this from a Panzer Lehr officer:

The Panzer Lehr Panthers, all 90 of them were on their way to the eastern Front ( in Poland ), but as the invasion started they were sent back by the Fuhrer.They returned on 10th of June.

So the tanks were not available until earliest on the 10th.

Amazon.com: The Western Front 1944, Memoirs of a Panzer Lehr Officer: Books: Ritgen Helmut
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old November 27th, 2007, 09:47 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stockport , England
Posts: 807
Salute!: 2
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
redcoat has a spectacular aura aboutredcoat has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: US on the left and Brits on the right

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Bull View Post
Many books seem to mention that the British/Canadians faced heavier German armoured opposition in Normandy following the lodgement phase than did the US Forces - but the extent of the difference is rarely mentioned.
The figures I have for the German forces at around the time of Goodwood/Cobra operations are as follows.

In the British/Canadian sector.

8 Panzer divisions with 654* tanks, and 92 infantry battalions
In the US sector.

2 Panzer divisions with 190 tanks and 85 infantry battalions.


* At this time all the Tiger I and Tiger II equipped units were in the British/Canadian sector
__________________
if in doubt....Panic!!!!

Last edited by redcoat; November 28th, 2007 at 01:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old November 28th, 2007, 01:31 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 577
Salute!: 0
Saluted 2 Times in 1 Post
Carl W Schwamberger has a spectacular aura aboutCarl W Schwamberger has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: US on the left and Brits on the right

Quote:
Originally Posted by redcoat View Post
The figures I have for the German forces at around the time of Goodwood/Cobra operations are as follows.

In the British/Canadian sector.

8 Panzer divisions with 654* tanks, and 92 infantry divisions.

In the US sector.

2 Panzer divisions with 190 tanks and 85 infantry divisions.


* At this time all the Tiger I and Tiger II equipped units were in the British/Canadian sector
From my notes the tank numbers look ok, but you must mean 'infantry battalions' not "divsions". Had those ten Pz divsion been full strength they would have had what, 2200 or 2300 tanks?
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old November 28th, 2007, 01:46 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stockport , England
Posts: 807
Salute!: 2
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
redcoat has a spectacular aura aboutredcoat has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: US on the left and Brits on the right

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl W Schwamberger View Post
From my notes the tank numbers look ok, but you must mean 'infantry battalions' not "divsions". Had those ten Pz divsion been full strength they would have had what, 2200 or 2300 tanks?
Sorry about that, I've corrected my original post
__________________
if in doubt....Panic!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old November 28th, 2007, 06:04 AM
Jaeger's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 743
Salute!: 6
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Jaeger Is actually quite decentJaeger Is actually quite decent
Default Re: US on the left and Brits on the right

Around 1200 tanks was the real tally.
__________________
'We march. The enemy is retreating in transport. We follow on foot.' Lt.Neil McCallum 5/7 Gordons 19th November 1942
Reply With Quote
  #61 (permalink)  
Old November 30th, 2007, 01:43 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 577
Salute!: 0
Saluted 2 Times in 1 Post
Carl W Schwamberger has a spectacular aura aboutCarl W Schwamberger has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: US on the left and Brits on the right

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaeger View Post
Around 1200 tanks was the real tally.
Which particular day? What about assualt guns, tank destroyers, & the light armored support weapons. Any handy numbers for those?
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old November 30th, 2007, 11:02 AM
Jaeger's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 743
Salute!: 6
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
Jaeger Is actually quite decentJaeger Is actually quite decent
Default Re: US on the left and Brits on the right

Carl

The numbers from Redcoat can be found in Monty's memoirs and Normandy to the Baltic.
Zetterling and Talmander in their book D-Day use German figures and state that 1600 plus change was sendt (including tanks already there) to Normandy. The battle against the Commonwealth and British had cost them 481 tanks up until 30th of July 1944.

As for Assault guns and Tk Destroyers etc. I don't have the book in front of me just now.

The book irks me since they portray the allies in a highly unfavourable way. It is almost cause to let the churchbells ring if an allied commander is able to tie his own shoes.

They are also poor at giving proper stats for the allies (the US in particular) but there you are.
__________________
'We march. The enemy is retreating in transport. We follow on foot.' Lt.Neil McCallum 5/7 Gordons 19th November 1942
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
There were five, now there are only four left.... C.Evans WWII Today 6 April 11th, 2007 07:46 AM
Need help from you Brits... wilconqr WWII Books and Publications 6 October 17th, 2004 06:33 PM
What if Hitler had left Berlin at wars end where do you think he would have gone? Why C.Evans What If? 71 March 17th, 2003 03:02 PM
Stalin left Moscow in October-November 1941? Kai-Petri What If? 3 January 12th, 2003 03:49 PM
Living Victoria Cross Recipients--only 23 left. C.Evans Information Requests 19 March 27th, 2002 02:47 AM


Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Allies