|
|  |
 |
Members: 6,450
Threads: 18,400
Posts: 230,121
Online: 184
Newest Member:
jrhess3 |
|
|
| What If? Alternate History: Speculate about WWII battles that never were. Could the Axis have won? What if Hitler had the bomb? |

February 9th, 2008, 01:17 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,836
Salute!: 98
Saluted 33 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
And to remember how Hitler reacted to the losses figures at Crete....
__________________
|

February 10th, 2008, 10:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holly, Michigan
Posts: 223
Salute!: 0
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai-Petri
And to remember how Hitler reacted to the losses figures at Crete....
|
Exactly. No more massive, airborne fallshirmjager operations.
|

February 12th, 2008, 11:56 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stockport , England
Posts: 841
Salute!: 8
Saluted 9 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
Quote:
Originally Posted by von Rundstedt
One main factor that Rommel pleaded with the Chiefs to deploy those forces allocated to Crete to be deployed over Malta, yes imho just as expensive but with Malta out of the picture the entire Med would be Axis and that the DAK would have it's supply lines intact. Rommel would have defeated the Brits in Egypt.
|
At times durimg the desert war the Luftwaffe managed to successfully neutralize Malta as an offensive base, but this didn't stop the attacks on the convoys. The British had bases in Egypt and the Middle East from which they operated during these times.
__________________
if in doubt....Panic!!!!
|

February 21st, 2008, 08:10 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 6,935
Salute!: 16
Saluted 64 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Dudek
Exactly. No more massive, airborne fallshirmjager operations.
|
Even before Crete there were huge losses of JU-52s. So the loss of this type of aircraft would also have to be factored into a Paratroop attack. And this was in just 5 days against a even smaller country.
"At the start of the Second World War, the RNlAF has a total of 125 combat ready aircraft, including 20 Fokker D-XXI's fighters, 26 Fokker G-Is twin boom fighters, 12 Fokker T-V bombers and 12 Douglas-Northrop 8A-3N bombers, all stationed at airfields in the western part of the Netherlands. During the 10 may 1940 attack by Germany, which lasted 5 days, 328 German aircraft were shot down, including 220 Ju-52 trimotor transporters, at a loss of 94 Dutch aircraft. Most of the training aircraft managed to escape to England, together with other members of the RNlAF, and with these resources a Dutch squadron operating under RAF command is formed : 322 squadron, equipped with different types of Spitfires."
http://www.scramble.nl/nl.htm
__________________
For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.
|

February 23rd, 2008, 04:41 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,527
Salute!: 2
Saluted 25 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
Eliminating Malta does nothing to alleviate the major logistic problems of the Germans. Tobruk and Bengahazi are still marginal ports due to the inability of the Germans and Italians to clear them of wrecks. The lack of an alternative to trucking supplies to the front (due to the inability of the Germans and Italians to build a rail line) means that there will still be massive shortages of supplies at the front.
There is no way around this. When it takes five gallons of gasoline to deliver one to the Alamein position for the Germans how can it be otherwise? When the Italians and Germans are running convoys with tankers half full due to a general shortage of petroleum products the same is true.
Malta is largely irrelevant to the situation in North Africa. Rommel was an amateur when it came to logistics. Literally, totally free of interference Rommel could not supply six mechanized divisions 500 to 800 miles from his logistical base in Libya and Tunisa by truck alone.
|

February 23rd, 2008, 05:44 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 244
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
could a purely air capture of southern england been successful had they planned it in advance?
after dunkirk, the brits would have raised at best 2 divisions. now what if four german airborn divisions captured bomber fields in southern england, landed in more men and material, while keeping me-109s stacked up overhead. the other airfields still with the brits would have been bombed round the clock, while fast boat units would dash across the channel to ship in more men and material? could they have marched to london without heavy tanks and artillery?
|

February 23rd, 2008, 05:49 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,527
Salute!: 2
Saluted 25 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
I suggest you read this thread carefully along with others on this board mac. Britain had 26 1/2 divisions in England of which just over half were more or less full strength 60 days after Dunkirk. They also had a half dozen immediately after more or less full strength. Germany had exactly one badly mauled parachute division that was the equivalent at its establishment strength of about half a regular infantry division less heavy weapons for an air assault.
Of couse, this doesn't include the 250,000 to 500,000 Home Guard being raised in the same period.
|

February 23rd, 2008, 05:53 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 6,935
Salute!: 16
Saluted 64 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
Quote:
Originally Posted by mac_bolan00
could a purely air capture of southern england been successful had they planned it in advance?
after dunkirk, the brits would have raised at best 2 divisions. now what if four german airborn divisions captured bomber fields in southern england, landed in more men and material, while keeping me-109s stacked up overhead. the other airfields still with the brits would have been bombed round the clock, while fast boat units would dash across the channel to ship in more men and material? could they have marched to london without heavy tanks and artillery?
|
Not at all. Still no chance. For alot of reasons already brought up before in this thread and others on the subject.
"The British government introduced conscription and by May 1940, British Army strength was brought up to 50 divisions. Of these, 13 divisions were in France fighting against the German Western Offensive. After the evacuations from Dunkirk were complete, the British Army had 1,650,000 men.
__________________
For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.
|

February 23rd, 2008, 05:55 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 244
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
whoah, man. i said, had they planned it in advance, meaning they had more airborne troops, transports, longer-ranged fighters and airlift-table weapons. and i'm sure they would have considered more enemies than just two divisions. my mistake, something i read years back concerning dunquerque.
|

February 23rd, 2008, 05:33 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,527
Salute!: 2
Saluted 25 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
OK. Where do the Germans get these additional units. Paratroops were largely untried until the Low Lands / French campaign. Doubling their number still leaves the Germans with insufficent numbers to overcome British defenses. The other problem is where do the transports come from? Do you propose cutting production on other aircraft like the Ju 88 in favor of more Ju 52? Then, the other problem is pilots. Historically, the Luftwaffe didn't have enough to man all the transport aircraft they had. So, they pulled all the instructors, flight crews, and advanced students from pilot schools to man these aircraft during operations for short periods.
Historically, the transport the Germans did have allowed for a drop of about one half of 7th Fallschirmjäger division or about 3500 men. So, even with a doubling of everything the Germans are still faced with making several drops which over England would have required more than one day to accomplish.
|

February 23rd, 2008, 05:39 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 6,935
Salute!: 16
Saluted 64 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
and just in case he missed it,
Even before Crete there were huge losses of JU-52s. So the loss of this type of aircraft would also have to be factored into a Paratroop attack. And this was in just 5 days against a even smaller country.
"At the start of the Second World War, the RNlAF has a total of 125 combat ready aircraft, including 20 Fokker D-XXI's fighters, 26 Fokker G-Is twin boom fighters, 12 Fokker T-V bombers and 12 Douglas-Northrop 8A-3N bombers, all stationed at airfields in the western part of the Netherlands. During the 10 may 1940 attack by Germany, which lasted 5 days, 328 German aircraft were shot down, including 220 Ju-52 trimotor transporters, at a loss of 94 Dutch aircraft. Most of the training aircraft managed to escape to England, together with other members of the RNlAF, and with these resources a Dutch squadron operating under RAF command is formed : 322 squadron, equipped with different types of Spitfires."
http://www.scramble.nl/nl.htm
Thats 220 JU-52s lost in just 5 days against a country where the Germans HAD command of the air.
__________________
For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.
Last edited by JCFalkenbergIII; February 24th, 2008 at 05:46 PM.
|

February 24th, 2008, 11:41 AM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,219
Salute!: 14
Saluted 40 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
Quote:
Originally Posted by mac_bolan00
now what if four german airborn divisions captured bomber fields in southern england,
|
Which bomber airfields in Southern england ?  The established bomber airfields were generally in the Cambridgeshire/Lincolnshire area - the South had the fighter airfields many of which at the time of the BofB were still little more than grass flying fields.....
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

February 24th, 2008, 01:02 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Gateway to the Highlands
Posts: 3,334
Salute!: 26
Saluted 22 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
In late 1944 the Nazis hatched a plan for a mass breakout of POWs in Britain, the aim being for them to form a division-sized force which would seize arms and supplies and then march on London. The plan was foiled by complete chance when a German-speaking US officer touring one of the camps overheard a conversation between two prisoners and alerted intelligence.
The fact the Nazi High Command even thought this was possible shows how bad their intelligence on Allied military strength was.
|

February 25th, 2008, 12:12 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,527
Salute!: 2
Saluted 25 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
You left out 1st and 2nd Canadian. As for the Home Guard by September the US had provided nearly a half million rifles, old US pattern Lee-Enfields in .30 caliber often seen in photos of Home Guard units with a red or white stripe on them to make the user aware that .303 rounds wouldn't work.
Regardless of losses, the Germans were in no position to launch a major invasion and in even worse shape to launch one that could have been successful.
|

February 25th, 2008, 12:27 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 6,935
Salute!: 16
Saluted 64 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
Quote:
Originally Posted by mac_bolan00
while fast boat units would dash across the channel to ship in more men and material?
|
What "fast boat units" are you referring to? And what types of "fast boat"?They would have to be very large to be able to ship in more men and sufficient materials in order to keep up the attack.
__________________
For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.
|

February 25th, 2008, 12:30 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Gateway to the Highlands
Posts: 3,334
Salute!: 26
Saluted 22 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
Weren't there also Australian units in Britain at that time? I seem to recall they were bound for somewhere else when war broke out and they were diverted to the UK?
|

February 25th, 2008, 12:45 AM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 6,935
Salute!: 16
Saluted 64 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
Yes there were.
The The 2nd AIF was amongst the almost 10,000 officers and men to disembark at Gourock UK,on the 17th June 1940. They comprised approximately one-third of the 6th Division and the corps troops raised with it, plus some 450 infantry reinforcements for that Division.
Second Australian Imperial Force - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Australian Army war diaries - Second World War
__________________
For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.
|

February 25th, 2008, 03:44 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
Regardless of all the tactical decisions that Hitler could of made. Even If he Invaded England and not Russia, How long would he have lasted as a leader? There is strong evidence of Parkinsons, Drug addiction and possible Epilepsy. Sure, as History unfolded the way it did, the growing pressures of a losing war weighed heavily on him physically and mentally however, even if the war w/ Russia does'nt happen and Sea Lion was a success, would he have been around after much longer after 46'???
|

February 26th, 2008, 12:55 AM
|
 |
Good Ol' Boy 
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Deep in the Heart of Dixie
Posts: 5,327
Salute!: 51
Saluted 48 Times in 41 Posts
|
|
Re: Operation Sealion Should Have Happened
Parkinson's does shortens one's life, though, and as he was already showing noticeable signs (no doubt exacerbated by the stress of a losing war) of it in his 50s, I would doubt his life span would extend into the 80s or 90s. Possible, but not probable.
Kai, neurosurgery is your forte, would you care to weigh in on this?
__________________
Best Regards,
JW
Flag of the State of Alabama
|

February 26th, 2008, 02:53 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,836
Salute!: 98
Saluted 33 Times in 29 Posts
| | |