Axis

Members: 3,719
Threads: 14,489
Posts: 180,700
Online: 285

Newest Member:
pony9a

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > General Discussion > What If?
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


What If? Alternate History: Speculate about WWII battles that never were. Could the Axis have won? What if Hitler had the bomb?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #26 (permalink)  
Old April 29th, 2008, 07:52 AM
Falcon Jun's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Quezon City, Philippines
Posts: 518
Falcon Jun has a spectacular aura aboutFalcon Jun has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tristan Scott View Post
Hitler was way out on a limb over Czechoslavakia. By the end of September the French, who had rejected Hitler's demands for the Sudetenland, were fully mobilizing sixty divisions on her frontier with Germany, against which Hitler could barely muster a dozen divisions, half of which were reserve units. The Czechs themselves had mobilized a million men-more than Hitler had for both fronts. When Hitler's deadline to the Czechs hadpassed, He had to be persuaded to call off the attack by Mussolini, who suggested the Munich conference. All indications are that not for this Hitler would have recklessly attacked and probably been defeated-bear in mind also that the German people were not enthusiastic for war over the Sudetenland.

I believe that it's very possible that had Chamberlain shown some backbone that the Nazis could have been crushed in 1938.
I generally subscribe with this viewpoint. Hitler was bluffing and nobody called his bluff. Chamberlain's official policy was to avoid war as much as possible. Chamberlain sincerely believed that if the bully could be sated, then he could be persuaded to stop being a bully. Unfortunately, Chamberlain turned out to be wrong with Hitler.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old April 29th, 2008, 03:06 PM
Joe's Avatar
Joe Joe is offline
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: A million miles away from...something a million miles away.
Posts: 1,731
Joe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Tristan Scott.

That was actually my first idea, but I abandoned it because I had a feeling it would be poo-pooed by others.

Honest!
__________________
"One might as well try to charge at a wall."-Napoleon, regarding the British Infantry.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old April 30th, 2008, 03:47 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 17
Tristan Scott is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe View Post
Tristan Scott.

That was actually my first idea, but I abandoned it because I had a feeling it would be poo-pooed by others.

Honest!
Well, Joe, I can't imagine why anyobne would have poo-pooed the idea. It's probably a concensus opinion among historians. I know that Liddel Hart and William Shirer believe that had Chamberlain shown resolve over the Sudetenland things would have ended up much differently.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old May 1st, 2008, 06:58 PM
Bravo104's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Almere The Netherlands
Posts: 22
Bravo104 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Quote:
Well, Joe, I can't imagine why anyobne would have poo-pooed the idea
I can't either. It is your opinion and it's open for debat, right? I gave my opinion on your what if and war is declared on me. Big deal, loads of fun. Makes it more interesting, don't you think?
Whatever your opinion, share it.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old May 1st, 2008, 07:42 PM
Joe's Avatar
Joe Joe is offline
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: A million miles away from...something a million miles away.
Posts: 1,731
Joe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Damn it, you all making me feel like some sort of bullied kid!
__________________
"One might as well try to charge at a wall."-Napoleon, regarding the British Infantry.
Reply With Quote
  #31 (permalink)  
Old May 1st, 2008, 08:12 PM
Tomcat's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Way down under
Posts: 1,155
Tomcat has a spectacular aura aboutTomcat has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bravo104 View Post
I can't either. It is your opinion and it's open for debat, right? I gave my opinion on your what if and war is declared on me. Big deal, loads of fun. Makes it more interesting, don't you think?
Whatever your opinion, share it.
Yeah Joe feel free to voice your opionion, just be prepared for a war
That discussion was interesting though Bravo, a Good one too, I look forward to another.
__________________
They shall grow not old as we that are left grow old Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We shall remember them. Lest We Forget
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old May 1st, 2008, 09:01 PM
Joe's Avatar
Joe Joe is offline
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: A million miles away from...something a million miles away.
Posts: 1,731
Joe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Well, the fear of the poo-poo was enough to destroy my ideas.

I hate loosing an argument, so I thought it would be better to never have one in the first place.
Besides, I removed the statement about inevitable war in my first post so lets all shut up about it now.

An idea being poo-pooed is a very bad thing, cos it says so in Blackadder!
__________________
"One might as well try to charge at a wall."-Napoleon, regarding the British Infantry.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old May 2nd, 2008, 05:23 AM
Bravo104's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Almere The Netherlands
Posts: 22
Bravo104 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

I'm looking forward to it too .
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old May 3rd, 2008, 05:04 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 427
Carl W Schwamberger will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai-Petri View Post
Donīt forget the Oster plan, cancelled at the final moment due to Hitlerīs bloodless victory:

Review | The Oster Conspiracy of 1938 by Terry Parssinen

Halder was the key figure to lose his nerve at the final moment.
Hmmm... So, if I understand this correctly: Chamberlain is persuaded to follow the French lead and stand firm, Hitler orders war against the Cezchs, France mobilizes, and the German Generals launch their coup.
__________________
I forgot my password, can I use yours?
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old May 3rd, 2008, 03:18 PM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 12,783
Kai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl W Schwamberger View Post
Hmmm... So, if I understand this correctly: Chamberlain is persuaded to follow the French lead and stand firm, Hitler orders war against the Cezchs, France mobilizes, and the German Generals launch their coup.
If Hitler had ordered the attack to begin the operation against Hitler would have begun and Hitler would have died mysteriously during the coup....All the men were in position only needed to say "Go!"...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old May 4th, 2008, 06:57 AM
Bravo104's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Almere The Netherlands
Posts: 22
Bravo104 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

What I wonder is why didn't they go ahead with it anyway. They surely must have foreseen what was coming.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old May 4th, 2008, 08:28 PM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 12,783
Kai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

After Hitler got all he "wanted" in Munich Hitlerīs position as the greatest leader ever in Germany was at least considered by Halder such that no coup could be accepted by the people of the Reich.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old May 5th, 2008, 12:37 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 427
Carl W Schwamberger will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bravo104 View Post
What I wonder is why didn't they go ahead with it anyway. They surely must have foreseen what was coming.
Not clearly. long ago I did a bit of reading about the coup plotters & related events. The point of view & thinking of the Germans in that era might seem very strange and suprisingly different to people of other cultures seventy years later.
__________________
I forgot my password, can I use yours?
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old May 5th, 2008, 02:33 AM
JCFalkenbergIII's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 2,318
JCFalkenbergIII is a jewel in the roughJCFalkenbergIII is a jewel in the roughJCFalkenbergIII is a jewel in the roughJCFalkenbergIII is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

20/20 Hindsight. Aint it great?
__________________
For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old May 5th, 2008, 06:13 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 17
Tristan Scott is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Also, I think you have to realize that the plot entailed a coalition of military leaders put together under the premise that Hitler going ahead with the invasion would be disasterous for Germany. When the invasion was postponed for the Munich conference, the plot was put on hold. When Hitler's aims: the aquisition of the Sudetenland, were achieved without invasion, the coalition understandably fell apart.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old May 6th, 2008, 11:12 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 68
bf109 emil is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

This is perhaps a thread with poor wording. Chamberlain tried to thwart German invasion the Chezch, while sending onvoys to try and have Russia side, or oppose this along sides with Great Britain. When Stalin refused to take up arms for the chezch's, their fate was sealed. Russia's only chance to perhaps do this is with French also, and reluctantly the French abided, and so likewise the Russian, leaving Britain as the scapegoat for handing the Sudetenland over. Before Chamberlain left for Berlin, his meeting with cabinet, and ultimately his conversation with H.C.T. Dowding helped in his decision. Dowding expressed to Chamberlain the plight Britain was in at the time....of all the armed forces, the air-force is the most costly and time consuming to establish...with designs of planes constantly needing updating, factories,and fitter needed to construct planes, airfield built, mechanics trained, and airmen required to fly successfully a painstaking slow process. He pointed out to Chamberlain, that a war with Germany was inevitable. But to come to blows in 1938, with RAF in it's infantcy, would result in the tried, trained, and equipped Luftwaffe having little or no resistance, nay for the defense of Britain was possible as well.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old May 6th, 2008, 12:29 PM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 12,783
Kai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

The USSR was not invited to the Munich "conference", which was a big mistake if you consider that in 1939 the Western Allies tried to make negotiations with Stalin. So Chamberlain was not discussing the European politics with Stalin in 1938, I think.

In 1938 it is perhaps that Chamberlain partly believed he could do the work himself and get Hitler to agree to a deal. Also the USSR as part of its help proposal required "pathways" through countries to help the Czechs which for countries like Poland was not ok. So Stalin was left out of the negotiations for several reasons.

This was rather interesting as well:

CJO - Abstract - THE SOVIET COMMISSARIAT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND THE CZECHOSLOVAKIAN CRISIS IN 1938: NEW MATERIAL FROM THE SOVIET ARCHIVES

The exchanges between Litvinov in Moscow and the Soviet polpred, Alexandrovsky, in Prague show clearly that the latter was repeatedly cautioned against encouraging the Czech leaders to think that they could rely on the unilateral assistance of the USSR. They reveal, too, the degree to which Litvinov and Potemkin, a deputy commissar, felt that Fierlinger, the Czech minister in Moscow, was misrepresenting the Soviet position in this respect. Additional evidence cited here confirms earlier views that the Soviet leadership was not prepared to act independently of France or outside the League of Nations even when the opportunities for assisting Czechoslovakia were available.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old May 6th, 2008, 01:35 PM
Za Rodinu's Avatar
Ace
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 5,385
Za Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really nice
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Interesting. Also it should be remembered that the USSR had no land border either with Czechoslovakia or Germany, there was at least Poland in the middle, so direct military support would be an interesting venture.
__________________
There is an ass in my avatar.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old May 7th, 2008, 02:51 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 25
mavfin is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai-Petri View Post
The USSR was not invited to the Munich "conference", which was a big mistake if you consider that in 1939 the Western Allies tried to make negotiations with Stalin.
Well, all that I've been able to find on this subject is that until Hitler broke the Munich agreement, the British and French thought the Soviet Union was a bigger enemy than Germany. Once Hitler showed his true colors, they then (too little, too late) tried to mend fences with Stalin, but by that time, Hitler was planning to make the pact with the Soviets to keep them quiet till such time as he was ready to take them on.

Comments?
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old May 7th, 2008, 06:50 AM
Za Rodinu's Avatar
Ace
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The world is my backside, hmm, backyard!
Posts: 5,385
Za Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really niceZa Rodinu is just really nice
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

A good summary
__________________
There is an ass in my avatar.
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old May 7th, 2008, 06:57 AM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 12,783
Kai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the roughKai-Petri is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

I guess several countries feared there would be a communistic revolution due to the USSR influence , but some pacts were made and some announcements as well:

Chronology of World War II

November 29 1932
France and the Soviet Union sign a Pact of Non-Agression.

May 2 1935
France and the Soviet Union conclude negotiations for a five-year Treaty of Mutual Assistance

March 1936
Robert Vansittart, the Permanent Undersecretary of State for Foreign Affairs in Great Britain, writes a memorandum warning that Germany's rearmament program would serve Adolf Hitler's plan to annex Austria, the Sudetenland, the Baltic states, and the Polish Corridor to East Prussia.

October 1936
The Joint Planning Committee of the Chiefs of Staff in England declares: "We are convinced that Germany would plan to gain her victory rapidly. Her first attacks would be designed as knock-out blows" referring to London being heavily bombed over a few weeks."
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old May 11th, 2008, 11:47 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 68
bf109 emil is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Chamberlain didn't give Sudetenland to Hitler.

Perhaps the Biggest mistake Hitler had shown, was Chamberlains views to the British backing Poland...until then most deals and talks where done indoors, or behind the media spotlight...Hitler views that Britain wouldn't back a Poland failed to realize this was posted public and in speeches to the world...knowing Britains stand and reputation should have told Hitler this threat was not an idle one as had he been able to by-pass up until now...
Reply With Quote