One thing first this is not my area of expertise so please throw me a bone although I still would like somebody to tell me how this would likely work out.

I was wondering: before the Battle of Britain and the Blitz started Goering and other Luftwaffe leaders had reconsidered investing much of their resources into heavy bombers but instead make twice the number of fighters! If the Germans had a better idea of Air superiority around that time and merely shot down British planes as they left their fields, strafed fishing boats, hit the radar towers, just to annoy the Tommys into sending up more planes to be shot down. But mind that if only the Luftwaffe would have invested resources into many more Fighter&Fighter/Divebombers. Having total air superiority over Britain would have gave them a licking they could never recover from.

Auf Weidersehen and good night to you all.
-Death's Head

__________________
"The perfect Aryan is as tall as Goebbels, as fit as Goering, as blond as Hitler, as handsome as Himmler and has a name such as Rosenberg."
"

Just to point out that the JU-88,DO-17 and HE-111 weren't heavy bombers. They were medium bombers. The Luftwaffe only had the HE-177 basically for a heavy bomber and that was later. Also the Luftwaffe did not have any air superiority of Great Britain due to the short range of thier fighters they had a very limited time in which to fight.

__________________


For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.

The JU-88 Was a dive bomber

I think it might of maybe hurt Britians production but Americas production would not be affect. America would defend britian. Maybe the end of the war would be a little later but it would not affect much.

__________________
When I feed the poor, they call me a saint,
but when I ask why the poor are hungry,
they call me a communist.

The problem here is that the Germans have no really good long ranged offensive fighters. Their mainstay, the Me 109 is a short ranged interceptor. That's good defensively but bad when you are attacking.

"The JU-88 Was a dive bomber"

The JU-88 was designed as a highspeed medium bomber. It also preformed these roles in addition to being a bomber,

Dive Bomber,Nightfighter,Recon,Torpedo bomber,Flying bomb (mistel),Heavy dayfighter,Train-buster in Russia,Long-Range ocean patroller,Long-range Pathfinder,Panzerjager/anti-tank, Night intruder, Weapons Test platform ,mine layer ,radio communication aircraft,liason transport,Research aircraft,Missile launcher,Close air support, trainer.

__________________


For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.

Yes i know it was used for those roles but the basic design and profile of the plane was a dive bomber. It was one of the best dive bombers ever built in my oponion. It also one of the most famous aircraft of the war.

__________________
When I feed the poor, they call me a saint,
but when I ask why the poor are hungry,
they call me a communist.

It was designed as a "Fast Bomber" first.

"Like the Mosquito, the Ju 88 originated as a fast bomber. In 1935 the Luftwaffe had a requirement for a so-called Schnellbomber, which should have a speed of 500km/h with 800kg of bombs."
uboat.net - Technical pages

"The Ju 88 was designed in response to an RLM requirement for a fast medium bomber. When first issued, this called for a twin engined bomber capable of a top speed of 310mph, and with a bomb load of 1,765lb"
Junkers Ju 88

"Considered by many to be the most versatile German aircraft in World War II, the Ju88 grew out of a requirement in 1935 for a three-seat high-speed bomber to be capable of more than 298mph / 480kph and remained in production until the end of the war."
Junkers Ju 88

"The Ju 88 is a cantilever low-wing, twin-engine monoplane, which was primarily designed as a bomber."
http://www.lonesentry.com/articles/ju88/index.html

The Ju 88 is the most important German bomber of World War 2. In fact it was much more than just a bomber; this family of planes has seen more different duties than any other (but maybe the English Mosquito): first designed as a Schnellbomber (fast bomber), it was developped into a conventional level-bomber, dive-bomber, torpedo bomber, heavy fighter, nightfighter, close support plane, recon plane, and even, in its Mistel form, as an air-to-ground flying bomb !
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/christop.../stofju88.html

In August 1935 the Reichsluftfahrtministerium submitted its requirements for an unarmed, three seat, high-speed bomber, with a payload of 800-1,000 kg.[2] Junkers presented their initial design in June 1936, and were given clearance to build two prototypes (Wk Nr 4941 and 4942).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkers_Ju_88

__________________


For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.

You might want to check this thread .

Best Multi-Purpose Aircraft ?

__________________


For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.

the germans should have bought zeros from japan.

And how would they have done that when the Zero wasn't introduced to Japanese service until Jun 1940 and did not fly its first mission until Aug of 1940? The Zero flew its first mission on 19 August 1940, escorting a bomb raid on Chungking, but encountered no aerial opposition. The Japanese certainly would not have had enough to sell to the Germans and supply their own navy at the same time even if the Germans had wanted them.

__________________


For the first time I have seen "History" at close quarters,and I know that its actual process is very different from what is presented to Posterity. - WWI General Max Hoffman.

Problem there is that the first Zero didn't fly until 14 September 1939, ten days after Germany was at war. The second prototype flew a month later and the third a month after that. It wasn't until July 1940 that the first operational unit using Zeros was flying them in China for service testing and almost two months passed before the Zero saw its first combat on 13 September 1940 almost a year to the day after the first one flew.

I doubt that the Zero would help the Germans with the BoB given that it would have been over before the first one was delivered.

I agree with the other posts in response to this suggestion. There would not have been enough Zeros to both equip the IJN and be exported to Germany; in the first three years of "volume" production, from March, 1939, to March, 1942, Mitsubishi and Nakajima combined managed to produce just 837 examples of this aircraft. The IJN was always chronically short of Zeros and that is why, at Coral Sea in May, 1942, when the Shoho was sunk, she was carrying mostly second-line A5M "Claude" fighters for air defense.

Besides the inability to produce sufficient numbers of the Zero, Japan was saddled with a fighter designed for combat against the Chinese Air Force. In combat against modern US and European fighters, flown by well trained pilots, the Zero proved to be a death-trap for it's unfortunate pilots. The Zero was an excellent dog fighter, but Allied pilots soon learned how to take that option away from their Japanese opponents. Jimmy Thach, the USN fighter pilot who developed the famous "Thach Weave" maneuver, said that a pilot would have to be insane, or suicidal, or both to climb into the cockpit of a Zero.

Mike, Zeros for Germany?
Now we all agree that it's highly unlikely if not impossible for Japan to manufacture enough Zeros to meet the demand of both Germany and Japan. But what if Germany took the Zero design and manufactured it on their own? German engineers would likely tinker with the design and introduce changes. What would the probable result be?
First off, self sealing tanks and some armor. That would lessen some of the Zero's performance. A change in the engine perhaps? Some of you guys here are better at the engineering and mechanical aspect so I think you guys could answer this best. Now the question that crops up in my mind would be how this modified Zero piloted with German pilots and using Luftwaffe tactics fair against Allied aircraft.

I personally think the me-109 could of killed the zero without a problem.

__________________
When I feed the poor, they call me a saint,
but when I ask why the poor are hungry,
they call me a communist.

Could you elaborate on this more, please?

__________________
Best Regards,
JW

i sayed in my personal oponion. Im gonna study both planes to find out however. However the me-109 was known to have more armor then the zero.

__________________
When I feed the poor, they call me a saint,
but when I ask why the poor are hungry,
they call me a communist.

OK, I think a Stuka was better then a spirfire in a combat role, I don't have any facts but there you go

__________________
They shall grow not old as we that are left grow old Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We shall remember them. Lest We Forget

Now please correct me if I'm wrong. If the Luftwaffe was able to keep a steady stream of fighters going over Britain( If more resources were into them) would the amount of flight time battered their efforts much? Londoners said themselves that the bombing became a part of everyday life. But if it was set up that there was always fighters their, morale would hit the fan and would drive the country into a steep step into submission? Now as said on the first line, please correct me if I'm wrong.

Also I would imagine the the Germans could do well with a German remade Zero.

__________________
"The perfect Aryan is as tall as Goebbels, as fit as Goering, as blond as Hitler, as handsome as Himmler and has a name such as Rosenberg."
"

I'm pretty sure that, somewhere in these forums, there is a thread that concludes that the Zero was better than the early versions of the Me 109...even without the increased fighter protection.

An advantage that the Zero has over the Me109 is that the Zero has a decisively longer range than the Me109. This allows the Zero to actually stay above Britain for long periods of time. As stated, what the Germans really needed were long-range escort fighters, not interceptors.

The Germans really didn't have a long-range strategic bomber, or a heavy bomber in the sense of a Lancaster or B17.

More importantly, how would production be affected by the sudden stoppage of bombers to create new fighters?