|
|  |
 |
Members: 6,447
Threads: 18,398
Posts: 230,046
Online: 309
Newest Member:
DWaters |
|
|
| WWII General Open WW2 discussion |

February 12th, 2006, 10:48 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where Iron Crosses grow
Posts: 7,849
Salute!: 93
Saluted 75 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bigiceman:
Bad decision, big mistake.
|
Bigiceman, welcome to the Good Side of the Force 
__________________
"On average it took five Panthers to take out a Sherman. Four would be in a ditch out of fuel or broken down, the fifth one just blows away the Sherman before breaking down." 
|

February 12th, 2006, 11:08 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where Iron Crosses grow
Posts: 7,849
Salute!: 93
Saluted 75 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Celestial:
July 15...
August 19...
September 19...
From about '43 it goes backwards for the Germans, but they were very successful in the intial stages.It wasn't Hitler's wisest decision but it was definitely not the dumbest!
|
See? This is the selective memory style fostered by the conventional view of the war. This reminds me of Guderian's memoirs, all fine and dandy with lots of detail when the going gets good, but then absolute amnesia when the winter of 1942 sets in and afterwards. Same with von Manstein's memoirs.
As the other side's histories were hard to find in the west, and besides they belonged to the ideological enemy, they were discounted and all we were fed were the rosy-tinted views through German lenses.
Read the article I suggested today elsewhere, American Perspectives on Eastern Front Operations in WW II. Oh, just to be sure, this is by an American author, not a Russian.
__________________
"On average it took five Panthers to take out a Sherman. Four would be in a ditch out of fuel or broken down, the fifth one just blows away the Sherman before breaking down." 
|

February 13th, 2006, 07:17 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dunkerque
Posts: 12
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Crete was the scene of the largest German Airborne operation of the war, and the first time in history that an island had been taken by airborne assault. Afterwards, Crete was dubbed the graveyard of the Fallschirmjager (German Parachutists); they suffered nearly 4000 killed and missing in the assault. It was also the first time the Germans had encountered stiff partisan activity, with women and even children getting involved in the battle. The XI Fliegerkorps was responsible for ferrying the paratroops to Crete using 500 JU-52's and 70 DFS-230 light assault gliders, all together 8100 men were dropped on to Crete, 1860 men at Maleme, 2460 men at Hania, 1380 men at Rethymno and 2360 men at Iraclion.
http://www.explorecrete.com/preveli/...-of-crete.html
__________________
|

February 13th, 2006, 07:24 AM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,219
Salute!: 14
Saluted 40 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
|
Although agreeing that Crete was a pyrrhic victory for the Germans, I'm not entirely convinced that is was dumb before the event, even though it certainly was afterward.
The Germans misjudged the reaction of the local populace ( sounds familiar... ) and the way things worked out, Crete became a strategic backwater. Not sure that these problems would have been too apparent when the decision was taken to attack.
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

February 13th, 2006, 07:32 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Worth Texas, USA
Posts: 811
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I wonder if the decision of the German's to use the airborne troops to take Crete was influenced in any way like the Supreme Headquarters European Armed Forces (SHEAF) decision to use airborne troops for Operation Market-Garden? The idea being that if we have them we might as well use them for something?
__________________
PEOPLE SLEEP PEACEABLY IN THEIR BEDS AT NIGHT ONLY BECAUSE ROUGH MEN STAND READY TO DO VIOLENCE ON THEIR BEHALF. GEORGE ORWELL
|

February 13th, 2006, 07:37 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Worth Texas, USA
Posts: 811
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Here is another idea for us to consider, how about something from the Pacific theater of operations.
Would the mission that they tried to send the Yamato on be dumber than what we have been talking about in Europe? Let's send out an un-escorted battlewagon to beach itself on Saipan and act as a heavy weapons platform till it gets blown away. It never even got close.
__________________
PEOPLE SLEEP PEACEABLY IN THEIR BEDS AT NIGHT ONLY BECAUSE ROUGH MEN STAND READY TO DO VIOLENCE ON THEIR BEHALF. GEORGE ORWELL
|

February 13th, 2006, 08:08 AM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,219
Salute!: 14
Saluted 40 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bigiceman:
The idea being that if we have them we might as well use them for something?
|
That may have been a factor - to be honest it's a few years since I read about Crete so can't remember - but also, the Germans weren't really geared-up for seaborne invasion.
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

February 13th, 2006, 01:06 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,836
Salute!: 98
Saluted 33 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
I think I recall the Germans had plans to take Cyprus and Malta as well in the next phase so this was just part of the bigger plan and Crete the beginning. However Hitler was totally frightened of the losses in Crete and said they´d never be used again.
One cannot deny though that after having "created" the troops Kurt Student probably was pushing to get to show how effective they were?
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERstudent.htm
"Student was involved with Hitler in planning Operation Sealion but eventually plans to drop parachute units in England and Northern Ireland were abandoned. So also were plans to carry out an airborne invasion of Gibraltar after General Francisco Franco refused to allow support troops to go across Spain."
A bit in the same line with Arnhem....?
__________________
|

February 13th, 2006, 01:29 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 3,343
Salute!: 49
Saluted 30 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
From the Pacific theatre of operations I would go for Peleliu, terrible waste.
__________________
 Man of the Year 1942
Regards, Richard
|

February 14th, 2006, 02:26 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 2,157
Salute!: 33
Saluted 16 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Narvik for the Germans was costly. Loosing the Blucher to a shore torpedo battery? Where was the recon/suppression?
Half their destroyers (10) as well.
One of 4 decent heavy cruisers. I know Seydlitz was never completed (or even laid down?), but Prinz Eugen & Hipper were.
__________________
There's one way to find out if a man is honest-ask him. If he says "Yes", you know he's a crook. Groucho Marx
|

February 28th, 2006, 10:42 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 366
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Hitler's order to deny the retreat and regrouping of the sixth panzer army at Stalingrad was quite a foolish move on his part. Alot of good soldiers died because he thought he was a brilliant military commander.
I don't recall the code name of the operation but there was a raid in Oran on some Vichy controlled port the night before operation Torch that was a complete failiure and resulted in the lives of many men.
__________________
|

March 1st, 2006, 04:59 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Occupied Confederate States
Posts: 47
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
With a heavy heart I must offer the Battle for Hurtgen Forest.
The Germans were delighted that the Americans wanted to throw their weight into an attack against dug-in troops in a forest where the American preponderance of artillery and command of the air would be of little value. Also, delighting the Germans was that the Hurtgen Forest was of little military value and, if lost to the Americans, could be flooded since the Germans held flood control dams above the level of the forest. It was a battle that the Germans really couldn't lose. But don't tell that to General Bradley or General Hodges. Their regrettable stubborness and unwillingness to realistically assess the engagement would reap a bloody harvest from the American high school classes of 1942, 1943 and 1944. The fight cost the 9th and 2nd Armored divisions 80% of their front-line troops. It was worse for the 28th division. Overall in the Hurtgen, the 28th suffered 6,184 combat casualties, plus 738 cases of trench foot and 620 battle fatigue cases. Those figures meant that virtually every front-line soldier was a casualty. The 28th Division had essentially been wiped out.
The 2nd Rangers fared no better with 90% casualties after weeks of unbelievably brutal fighting.
After the war, German General Rolf van Gersdorff commented, "I have engaged in the long campaigns in Russia as well as other fronts and I believe the fighting in the Hurtgen was the heaviest I have ever witnessed."
The battle lasted ninety days and involved nine American Divisions and their supporting units. More than 24,000 Americans lost their lives and there were another 9,000 casualties from trench foot, disease and combat exhaustion. So ended the battle for the Hurtgen Forest.
Heartbreaking. 
__________________
“It’s the unconquerable soul of man, not the nature of the weapon he uses, that insures victory.”
|

March 1st, 2006, 11:30 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,324
Salute!: 5
Saluted 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
The occupation of the Agean islands...And leaving the Raf ground crew to their own devices...Germans had a good fishing trip.
__________________
Prepare to repel borders.
William L. McGonagle, MOH, U. S. Navy, Commanding Officer, USS LIBERTY 1967.
|

October 15th, 2007, 11:44 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 8
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: "Dumbest" attack?
OPeration MArket Garden was one of the worst planned operations of the war. INtel was wrong, commcation between america and britsh was horrabble as well and they went in to deep and not wide enough there were lucky they didnt get sourrounded
|

October 16th, 2007, 02:18 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Britannia
Posts: 2,362
Salute!: 31
Saluted 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: "Dumbest" attack?
The British at Arnhem did.
|

October 16th, 2007, 03:53 PM
|
|
Dishonorably Discharged
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hull, England
Posts: 108
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: "Dumbest" attack?
The plan to send an expeditionary force in 1940 to Finland by Britain and France so as to have a war with the USSR at the same time as Germany!
|

October 16th, 2007, 04:28 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where Iron Crosses grow
Posts: 7,849
Salute!: 93
Saluted 75 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
Re: "Dumbest" attack?
That's a good one, Squeeth!
My offer is Unternehmen Bodenplatte.
Quote:
|
Operation Bodenplatte was a well meant but ill conceived plan to destroy Allied air craft on their landing fields. The plan was to have most of the remaining Luftwaffe Jagdwaffe pull a mass surprise attack on the morning of January 1, 1945. This was to cause havoc and eliminate Allied air power which was doing a great deal of damage to German forces during the Battle of the Bulge. Well as plans go, so did this one; awry, that is. Few fields were properly damaged and the losses of valuable Luftwaffe fighters was high. Many were either unable to find their targets, were shot down by friendly AA, or were late in arrival so met an alert and ready enemy.
|
Unternehmen Bodenplatte - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
OPERATION BODENPLATTE Flight Journal - Find Articles
__________________
"On average it took five Panthers to take out a Sherman. Four would be in a ditch out of fuel or broken down, the fifth one just blows away the Sherman before breaking down." 
|

October 16th, 2007, 06:26 PM
|
 |
Kommodore 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: France
Posts: 7,110
Salute!: 74
Saluted 74 Times in 58 Posts
|
|
Re: "Dumbest" attack?
The useless destruction of the city of Rotterdam which happened after the surrender of the Dutch army.
__________________
|

October 16th, 2007, 07:38 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: U. S.
Posts: 3,526
Salute!: 2
Saluted 24 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Re: "Dumbest" attack?
During the New Guinea campaign MacAuthur sent an infantry regiment (sorry, don't have the number and division right off 35th ID?) across the Owen Stanley mountian range on what was marked as a trail on his maps to outflank the Japanese at Buna. The regiment set off on this march finding the trail didn't exist. Over the next month and half they fought their way through jungle over a 12,000 ft + mountian range losing nearly 2/3rds of the regiment to disease and deprivation.
Worse, when the survivors arrived at Buna they found the rest of the division had been flown in weeks before and were already occupying the area they were supposed to take. That ranks in my book as one of the most idiotic operations of the war.
|

October 17th, 2007, 01:44 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,572
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: "Dumbest" attack?
|

October 17th, 2007, 10:35 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Quezon City, Philippines
Posts: 878
Salute!: 26
Saluted 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: "Dumbest" attack?
I would have to say it would be the Liberation of Manila by US forces.
Manila was declared an open city and the Imperial Japanese troops was in the process of leaving. When US officers learned that members of the Imperial Japanese Navy weren't going to leave, the US decided to use artillery and bombers to pound the Japanese. The US succeeded but they destroyed an entire city in the process. The devastation was described as almost like what happened to Warsaw.
Tens of thousands of Filipino civilians were killed in what I view was an unneccesary battle. Whole families were wiped out by Japanese bayonets and indiscriminate US artillery. Personally, when I think and read the accounts of this battle, I feel agitated.
| |