Axis

Members: 6,448
Threads: 18,399
Posts: 230,075
Online: 313

Newest Member:
folgore1961

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > General Discussion > WWII General
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


WWII General Open WW2 discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old June 28th, 2007, 01:51 PM
chocapic's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 698
Salute!: 6
Saluted 3 Times in 3 Posts
chocapic Is actually quite decentchocapic Is actually quite decent
Default Question about the Germano-Sovietic pact

I wonder if this pact would ever have been signed if it did not included the secret part, in which Hitler and Stalin shared territories like Poland or Baltic states.

In other words, was this secret part the main core of the treaty ?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old June 28th, 2007, 02:15 PM
PzJgr's Avatar
Drill Instructor
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 4,723
Salute!: 20
Saluted 49 Times in 33 Posts
PzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Question about the Germano-Sovietic pact

In my opinion I would think so. Imagine you are Stalin and Hitler comes to you with a proposal for a non-agression pact. The same Hitler that has publicly denounced Communism. The same Hitler that has outline his plan for fighting the Eastern countries in his book. Would you sign a pact with him without creating a buffer zone? Without the secret clauses, Hitler would have been right on the Soviet border. He could then have moved north into the baltic countries and taken them for himself.

Nah, without the secret clauses, I do not believe Stalin would have signed. Hitler also needed that pact and Russia's cooperation. Hitler was ready to take on Poland but not Russia. Not yet.
__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old June 28th, 2007, 02:44 PM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,836
Salute!: 98
Saluted 33 Times in 29 Posts
Kai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Question about the Germano-Sovietic pact

If I ask myself would there have been a pact without the secret part the answer is no.So it was an essential part of the pact.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old June 28th, 2007, 05:55 PM
Sloniksp's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,504
Salute!: 3
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Question about the Germano-Sovietic pact

I am also going to agree. As much as Hitler disliked Stalin, he needed assurance that he would not be attacked while conquering Europe. Stalin liked the plan because it would give him the same assurance with a buffer zone and give hime time to build up his military.
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler

T-34/85
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old June 28th, 2007, 07:31 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 32
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Pro_Consul is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Question about the Germano-Sovietic pact

To my thinking the essential heart of the pact WAS the secret part. I believe that as far as both sides were concerned, the most important reasons for even making a pact were contained in that portion, not in the publicly released window dressing behind which they concealed it. Take away the secret portions, particularly the partitioning agreement and the exchange of foreign credit by the Germans in exchange for critical resources from the Soviets, and you are left with nothing but a "non-aggression" pact, just as was publicly sold to the world. But both sides knew from the outset that no such peace pact would hold for any longer than both sides found it convenient, so there was no reason for them to have even bothered unless it were to achieve other aims.

For Stalin, as others have said, it was to put a buffer between the USSR and Germany and buy time for him to prepare his forces for the war he knew was coming. He had known for some time that the western allies were trying to set him up as Germany's first target in the hopes that the Fascists and Communists would weaken each other enough so that neither would be a threat to the West. So he took steps to turn the tables and have the Fascists and western Allies do the same thing and lessen the threat to the USSR. He also had need for the foreign currency in order to try to purchase overseas some of that multitude of things his military needed but currently lacked.

For Germany it was only a little different. They, too, wanted a buffer at their back while they took on Western Europe. They also needed the petrol, food, lumber and a few other strategic materials in order to keep a war economy moving long enough to secure other sources of most of those commodities by force.

All of that said, it seems to me a better question to ask, were there reasons for drafting a public non-aggression treaty other than as window dressing to hide the secret protocols?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old June 28th, 2007, 09:52 PM
tikilal's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 838
Salute!: 1
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
tikilal Is actually quite decenttikilal Is actually quite decent
Default Re: Question about the Germano-Sovietic pact

Why even bother to be secret anyway? The rest of the world would know that Russia occupied parts of Poland then the Baltic states as soon as they did it. But yes I also agree that the secret part was important.

Do you think the there would have been an agreement without the secret part? I think there would have been. Neither Russia nor Germany were ready for a war. Even if Stalin didn’t like I think he would have agreed to buy time either to build his personal military or to build an alliance with France and Britain. As it was France debated declaring war on Russia when it invaded Poland.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old June 29th, 2007, 03:18 AM
PzJgr's Avatar
Drill Instructor
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 4,723
Salute!: 20
Saluted 49 Times in 33 Posts
PzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Question about the Germano-Sovietic pact

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro_Consul View Post
For Germany it was only a little different. They, too, wanted a buffer at their back while they took on Western Europe. They also needed the petrol, food, lumber and a few other strategic materials in order to keep a war economy moving long enough to secure other sources of most of those commodities by force.
Hindsight shows this to be true but at the time Hitler did not expect France and Britain to declare war. He expected them to do another Munich tap dance for him. So the Buffer was really to appease Stalin while Hitler strengthened his position in the West (politically) before taking on Stalin.
__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old June 29th, 2007, 03:53 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 32
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Pro_Consul is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Question about the Germano-Sovietic pact

Quote:
Originally Posted by PzJgr View Post
Hindsight shows this to be true but at the time Hitler did not expect France and Britain to declare war. He expected them to do another Munich tap dance for him.
Do you have some support for this, because it runs contrary to what I have read elsewhere. If there is some evidence that Hitler actually expected to be able to invade and then partition Poland without the Allies declaring war on Germany, I would find that extremely interesting to study.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old June 29th, 2007, 06:13 AM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,836
Salute!: 98
Saluted 33 Times in 29 Posts
Kai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Question about the Germano-Sovietic pact

I think Hitler was rather annoyed at Ribbentrop once the war declarations started coming in, who was telling Hitler how well he knew how the West would behave. Then again Ribbentrop probably always agreed with Hitler.

But the fact is that Hitler never wanted war , at least with Britain, which is why he later on on several occasions suggested peace, and also he believed that Britain would not enter war because that would be the end of the Empire.

I think by google with search words Hitler,Ribbentrop, war declaration, Britain,France and 1939 will get you alot of sites on the subject.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old June 29th, 2007, 04:56 PM
PzJgr's Avatar
Drill Instructor
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 4,723
Salute!: 20
Saluted 49 Times in 33 Posts
PzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Question about the Germano-Sovietic pact

Agreed Kai. What were those famous words Hitler used upon receipt of Britain's declaration of war................"what now". Like is said in my post, in hindsight, the non-aggression pact worked in Hitler's favor but that was not the original intent.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/special_..._ii/430918.stm

http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/ultimatum.htm
__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old June 29th, 2007, 06:46 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 32
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Pro_Consul is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Question about the Germano-Sovietic pact

Good links. Thanks, PzJgr.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old July 1st, 2007, 10:18 AM
chocapic's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 698
Salute!: 6
Saluted 3 Times in 3 Posts
chocapic Is actually quite decentchocapic Is actually quite decent
Default Re: Question about the Germano-Sovietic pact

Thank you for all your replies and explanations.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old August 9th, 2007, 05:43 PM
PzJgr's Avatar
Drill Instructor
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 4,723
Salute!: 20
Saluted 49 Times in 33 Posts
PzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of lightPzJgr is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Question about the Germano-Sovietic pact

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro_Consul View Post
Good links. Thanks, PzJgr.
No problem. Cheers.
__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Soviet Union doesn't sign non aggresion pact nuetralobserver What If? 16 June 19th, 2007 04:46 AM
Mussolini and Ribbentrop Molotov pact Kai-Petri Information Requests 0 January 20th, 2007 10:32 PM
Poland releases Warsaw pact files Kai-Petri Military History 1 December 21st, 2005 09:30 AM
The "Ribbentrop" pact 1939 Kai-Petri Russia at War 7 August 1st, 2003 03:50 PM
A question.... Mussolini Militaria 5 October 19th, 2000 08:05 PM


Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Allies