|
|  |
 |
Members: 5,670
Threads: 17,385
Posts: 216,626
Online: 167
Newest Member:
CSBubba |
|
|
| WWII General Open WW2 discussion |

July 9th, 2002, 09:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 214
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I don't agree. 12.SS was far from 'elite' because they did not manage to achieve that much.
__________________
Also spricht der Narr: 'der Umgang mit Menschen verdirbt den Charakter, sonderlich wenn man keinen hat.'
|

July 9th, 2002, 10:17 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 306
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
Yes ,this is the same 12th SS that executed Canadian prisnors of the 3rd Inf Div in Normandy. This understandably resulted in retaliation in kind from the candians. The two divisions fought in some of the bitterest combat of the war. These men were just that, men, not children, they were recruited as children and brought up on a diet of propaganda, but they were adults, and as such responsible for their actions.
__________________
Ain't no rocket scientists in the firehall
|

July 9th, 2002, 10:36 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 4,454
Salute!: 1
Saluted 9 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
|
I must disagree. The 12SS was an elite unit that made significant contributions in the defensive battles in Normandy and in the east. You cannot tell me that depriving the British of Caen for that length of time is not significant. Also holding the bottleneck open at Falaise. All this from what you call "Children".
__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!
|

July 9th, 2002, 10:55 PM
|
 |
Alte Hase 
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,385
Salute!: 9
Saluted 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
|
Sorry PzJgr, but the 12th SS at the time of Normandy was nowhere an eliete unit. Having a cadre of the 1st SS and the 9/10ths make-up of 17-18 yr old Hiter Jugend does not constitute a battle hardened formation. If there were elite statis given to any Pz Ss units then it would be the 1st and 2nd SS and lesser extent the 9th and 10th whcih served on the eastern front briefly.
501 and 502 SS Pz. Abt. came via the first two units mentioned so they must be considered quite good, in fact probably the 502nd due to the amount of Allied tanks destroyed.
As the time of the Ardenne as been mentioned recrutis were installed within 12th SS ranks to fill the depleted unit out, in fact all the SS Pz formations were a bit on the weak side come Decmeber 44.........you knew this already though.....
E
|

July 9th, 2002, 11:38 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Norwich, but in excile in Catterick, N Yorkshire,
Posts: 762
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I guess it depend how exactly you define 'elite'. There have been units given elite status before they have even seen combat. Paratroopers from most countries were called elite simply on the basis of their roll, which required long periods without support behind enemy lines. The Pz Lehr was considered elite because it was made up of experianced instructors. But they had seen combat in different units not together. The 1st and 2nd SS were still called elite in Dec 44, even thogh they ere shadows of their former selves, woith many of the exoerianced men either dead to sent to form othe units.
__________________
'England confides that every man will do his duty' Nelson
'I'm a Norfolk man, and glory in being so' Nelson

Proud to be a GRUNT
|

July 10th, 2002, 03:13 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 4,454
Salute!: 1
Saluted 9 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
|
I would agree that a unit cannot be called elite when they have not seen battle but I think we would agree that the 12th has earned that status. All of the Waffen SS units were a shadow of their former selves. At the end of the war even the Grossdeutschland was not what it use to be but that does not mean that it was not considered an elite unit. I consider the 12th and elite unit as do others here judging by the list on Friedrich's post of the top 10 units. I respect your opinion but stand by mine. [img]smile.gif[/img]
__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!
|

November 28th, 2005, 02:18 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,433
Salute!: 40
Saluted 13 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Just reading on this on Charles Messengerīs "Hitlerīs Gladiator " on Sepp Dietrich.
It is mentioned that the massacre is brodcasted on Soldatensender Calais ( British propaganda radio station ) on 21th Dec 1944 but the area was not in allied hands until mid-January. Why didnīt the Germans take away the bodies if they all knew about it some days after it happened? I donīt say it did not happen just amazed that "if everyone knew why nobody in the German side checked the place?"... Or were they afraid of what might be found?
__________________
|

November 28th, 2005, 04:58 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Texas Ambassador to Ohio
Posts: 4,454
Salute!: 1
Saluted 9 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
|
You would think that if the massacre was intentional, they would have at least buried the bodies in a mass grave. Does this give credance to the latest theory that it was not an intentional massacre per se and just came about after the attempted escape by a few?
__________________

American by birth, TEXAN by the grace of GOD!
|

November 28th, 2005, 05:33 PM
|
 |
Acting Wg. Cdr. 
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London
Posts: 9,136
Salute!: 2
Saluted 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
|
With the speed and pressure of the advance, and then the retreat, I think that burying bodies wouldn't have been a priority for the German forces. They didn't really have the strength to occupy territory as such, and the area concerned was snow-covered from just after the massacre. The snow fell on ground which was already frozen making any digging activity very difficult.
__________________
"Stand by to pull me out of the seat if I get hit" - Guy Gibson
|

November 28th, 2005, 10:01 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stockport , England
Posts: 807
Salute!: 2
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by PzJgr:
You would think that if the massacre was intentional, they would have at least buried the bodies in a mass grave. Does this give credance to the latest theory that it was not an intentional massacre per se and just came about after the attempted escape by a few?
|
They were killed simply because to have taken them prisoner would have required resources in men and material that were needed to continue the attack.
As for burying them, again that would have held them up.
__________________
if in doubt....Panic!!!!
|

November 29th, 2005, 08:58 AM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,433
Salute!: 40
Saluted 13 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
I suppose in the end the German commanders did not care anymore as they had their hands full already. However I do find that if they were ( and they were ) aware of this kind of massacre through the allied broadcast they should have checked it properly and not just wipe it under carpet that "The German army does not do those things!" This includes Sepp as well unfortunately.
__________________
|

November 29th, 2005, 10:28 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stockport , England
Posts: 807
Salute!: 2
Saluted 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Kai-Petri:
"The German army does not do those things!"
|
That statement would cause a few raised eyebrows on the Eastern Front [img]graemlins/no.gif[/img]
__________________
if in doubt....Panic!!!!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:56 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright Đ 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger
|
 |