Axis

Members: 6,492
Threads: 18,463
Posts: 230,968
Online: 439

Newest Member:
billyb

 
 
 
Go Back   World War II Forums > General Discussion > WWII General
Register FAQ Gallery Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


WWII General Open WW2 discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #26 (permalink)  
Old April 17th, 2008, 12:14 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 245
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
mac_bolan00 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

Eisenhower's "broad front" strategy. If he let Montgomery in charge of the land forces, the iron curtain would have gone up in eastern Poland.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old April 17th, 2008, 12:49 AM
Matthew's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 45
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Matthew is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

Hitler made his biggest mistake by invading Russia. He could have used those men for the beach defenses at Normandy or another significant battle. It goes to show that the tide of a war can change hands very easily.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old April 17th, 2008, 04:25 AM
Sloniksp's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanging the flag on the Reichstag!
Posts: 3,504
Salute!: 3
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the roughSloniksp is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

I agree with Mathew.

Attacking the Soviet Union was Hitler's biggest mistake. Accordinging to Glantz, Hitler attacked Russia because she was at her weakest state and had Hitler waited any longer the chances of success in the east would have deminished. Ironically attacking Russia at her weakest stake, was what cost Germany the war.
__________________
The war against Russia will be such that it cannot be conducted in a knightly fashion. This struggle is one of ideologies and racial differences and will have to be conducted with unprecedented, unmerciful and unrelenting harshness. -Adolf Hitler

T-34/85
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old April 17th, 2008, 09:44 AM
Paul Errass's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 448
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Paul Errass Is actually quite decentPaul Errass Is actually quite decentPaul Errass Is actually quite decent
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

I realise that this thread goes back a bit but for one the Leningrad Front was one of the hardest Fronts to fight on , the attritional combat was going on all the time as well as some large scale assualts by both sides , they just didn't have the spectacular advances or defeats ( until 1944 ) that occurred further south.

Nice to see that the Monty bashers have been out as well !!!

How about the vainglorious Mark Clark , whose descision to head for Rome for his own personal glory failed to trap the German Army in Italy South of Rome and allowed them to withdraw North to the prepared defensive lines and causing tens of thousands of British and American soldiers to lose their lives, far more than at Arnhem.

He must qualify as one of the worst Allied Generals of WW2 ??
__________________
Nikto ne Zabyt . Nichto ne Zabyto.

Let no one forget . Let nothing be forgotten.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old April 17th, 2008, 03:14 PM
Joe's Avatar
Joe Joe is online now
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Britannia
Posts: 2,377
Salute!: 32
Saluted 7 Times in 7 Posts
Joe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

I think Market Garden, although ultimately it failed miserably, was a wise choice.
Why attack head on when you can outflank?

And the western Allies could not have reached berlin at all. Yalta was the main reason for that.
Reply With Quote
  #31 (permalink)  
Old April 17th, 2008, 07:22 PM
FramerT's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,572
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
FramerT Is actually quite decentFramerT Is actually quite decent
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

Stauffenberg for not getting the "job" done. After the failed attempt on Hitler's life, no one
ever again would go against Hitler's plans.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old April 18th, 2008, 11:20 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 120
Salute!: 1
Saluted 2 Times in 1 Post
Drucius is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

Market Garden was simply a half - failed operation, Hitler's invasion of Russia was a disaster on a grand scale. Hitler made so many errors it's astonishing that some people still consider him in any way militarily competent.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old April 18th, 2008, 12:35 PM
Tomcat's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Way down under
Posts: 1,704
Salute!: 24
Saluted 8 Times in 8 Posts
Tomcat Is actually quite decentTomcat Is actually quite decentTomcat Is actually quite decent
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe View Post
I think Market Garden, although ultimately it failed miserably, was a wise choice.
Why attack head on when you can outflank?

And the western Allies could not have reached berlin at all. Yalta was the main reason for that.
I agree Joe, Although Markey Garden was a failure all but Arnhem Bridge were captured, making any possible advance by the Germans harder. Every liberated city is another one closer to the end of the war.

Now what if the Allied plan had succeeded, and Arnhem had fallen to the allies? could they have broken through into Germany and could the war really have ended by Christmas in 1944 instead of 1945? Could Germany had fallen to the Western allies thus possibly eliminating the Iron Curtain from Berlin and making it further east in poland?
__________________
They shall grow not old as we that are left grow old Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We shall remember them. Lest We Forget
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old April 18th, 2008, 01:02 PM
Kai-Petri's Avatar
Kenraali
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kotka, Finland
Posts: 14,870
Salute!: 102
Saluted 35 Times in 31 Posts
Kai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of lightKai-Petri is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

Hitler for sacrificing all his best ( and last) troops in Ardennes attack Dec 1944 and Operation Spring Awakening in Hungary march 1945. Total waste.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old April 18th, 2008, 01:13 PM
Tomcat's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Way down under
Posts: 1,704
Salute!: 24
Saluted 8 Times in 8 Posts
Tomcat Is actually quite decentTomcat Is actually quite decentTomcat Is actually quite decent
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

There are so many to list.

Hitlers descision not to crush the British at Dunkirk.
France's General's when using tanks
Georings Descisions during the Battle Of Britian
The complete invasion of North Africa by the Italians
The invasion of Russia
Stalingrad, what a waste
Seaborne raid of Dieppe.
Hitlers descision to not let Rommel take his panzers onto the Normandy Beaches
Hitlers failure to accept the invasion as the real thing
Hitlers overall command of the entire army
The Scuttling of the Graff Spee by Propaganda
The attempeted breakout of the Bismarck into the Atlantic (she would never have done anything to really help)
The French not allying themselves to surrended there fleet to the British after the fall of France.
To a point, Operation Market Garden.


This could go on and on, every side made mistakes, of course whit hitler in charge, more then should have occured.
__________________
They shall grow not old as we that are left grow old Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We shall remember them. Lest We Forget
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old April 18th, 2008, 02:04 PM
Joe's Avatar
Joe Joe is online now
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Britannia
Posts: 2,377
Salute!: 32
Saluted 7 Times in 7 Posts
Joe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

I agree mostly, but what use is are Panzers vs Battlehips Tomcat? If Rommel sent his tanks onto the beaches, they would have been totaly smashed by naval gunfire.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old April 18th, 2008, 05:15 PM
Paul Errass's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 448
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Paul Errass Is actually quite decentPaul Errass Is actually quite decentPaul Errass Is actually quite decent
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

Market Garden was a risk worth taking, for reasons which we all know it didn't work out but was it the worst move of the war , i don't think so !!

It is the Battle which brings the Monty bashers out in force that and Normandy of course , too cautious in Normandy but too rash and overambitious at Market Garden , which one is it ??? You can't have it both ways !!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Nikto ne Zabyt . Nichto ne Zabyto.

Let no one forget . Let nothing be forgotten.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old April 18th, 2008, 11:35 PM
Matthew's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 45
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Matthew is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai-Petri View Post
Hitler for sacrificing all his best ( and last) troops in Ardennes attack Dec 1944 and Operation Spring Awakening in Hungary march 1945. Total waste.
I strongly agree. Berlin needed as many defenders as possible during the battle of Berlin. According to Wikipedia German's strength was 500,000 men so 575,000 men at Berlin would have made a considerable difference.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old April 18th, 2008, 11:47 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Stockport , England
Posts: 842
Salute!: 8
Saluted 9 Times in 4 Posts
redcoat has a spectacular aura aboutredcoat has a spectacular aura about
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

Quote:
Originally Posted by PzJgr View Post
Montgomery: Operation Market Garden. Need I say more.
Actually you do.
Market Garden was merely one of a number of set-backs* the Allies suffered in this period due to a resurgence in the Germany army

*Metz and the Hurtgen Forest, both with higher casualties for the Allies than Market Garden
__________________
if in doubt....Panic!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old April 19th, 2008, 12:41 AM
Paul Errass's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 448
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
Paul Errass Is actually quite decentPaul Errass Is actually quite decentPaul Errass Is actually quite decent
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

Well said Redcoat !
__________________
Nikto ne Zabyt . Nichto ne Zabyto.

Let no one forget . Let nothing be forgotten.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old April 19th, 2008, 12:58 AM
Tomcat's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Way down under
Posts: 1,704
Salute!: 24
Saluted 8 Times in 8 Posts
Tomcat Is actually quite decentTomcat Is actually quite decentTomcat Is actually quite decent
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe View Post
I agree mostly, but what use is are Panzers vs Battlehips Tomcat? If Rommel sent his tanks onto the beaches, they would have been totaly smashed by naval gunfire.
Good point Joe, But once they were on the shore there was no stopping them, so they had to stop them at the beachs, and taking on tanks while assualting a beach would have been one hell of a battle for the allies
__________________
They shall grow not old as we that are left grow old Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We shall remember them. Lest We Forget
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old April 19th, 2008, 10:05 PM
Joe's Avatar
Joe Joe is online now
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Britannia
Posts: 2,377
Salute!: 32
Saluted 7 Times in 7 Posts
Joe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the roughJoe is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

But would Rommel have enough tanks to blanket all the beaches with them?
It would only be about the same amount of difficulty in taking out bunkers and pillboxes. Remember, tanks get easily bogged down on sand, so they would have to stay put just off the beach, maybe behind the sea wall, where they are quite vulnerable to Naval fire. And remember, once the allies get four or five men on shore, they take out a pillbox and let another five advance ect ect. Even if he did move his tankeys onto the beaches, Rommel (and the Third Riech) where doomed.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old April 20th, 2008, 12:15 AM
Tomcat's Avatar
WW2F Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Way down under
Posts: 1,704
Salute!: 24
Saluted 8 Times in 8 Posts
Tomcat Is actually quite decentTomcat Is actually quite decentTomcat Is actually quite decent
Default Re: Worst Move by any of the generals in the war

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe View Post
But would Rommel have enough tanks to blanket all the beaches with them?
It would only be about the same amount of difficulty in taking out bunkers and pillboxes. Remember, tanks get easily bogged down on sand, so they would have to stay put just off the beach, maybe behind the sea wall, where they are quite vulnerable to Naval fire. And remember, once the allies get four or five men on shore, they take out a pillbox and let another five advance ect ect. Even if he did move his tankeys onto the beaches, Rommel (and the Third Riech) where doomed.
Well that would be a process of elimination, they were guessing between the Pais de Calais and Normandy, since they allowed the most freedom once they land, as well as being close to england for supplies and they needed the large harbour's capable of sustaining the amount of supples needed for the invasion.

I didn't mean move them on the sand, but more in a reserve position behind the beach, but not as far as they were, this way they could support the infantry defending at least the trenchs behind the frontal bunkers.

But I do suppose that you are right, the naval fire would be a big problem, and if that wasn't bad enough, then the air force would have been the problem. BUt I just think that had they been in a better or closer role they could have done more damage.

It probably is a good thing that they were where they were. If they hadn't the invasion could have failed.
__________________
They shall grow not old as we that are left grow old Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We shall remember them. Lest We Forget
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Google
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2007, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.Ad Management by RedTyger

Allies