|
|  |
 |
Members: 17,930
Threads: 35,231
Posts: 409,320
Online: 359
Newest Member:
GE 999 |
|
|
| WWII General Open WW2 discussion |

December 9th, 2002, 10:32 AM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 17,858
Salute!: 707
Saluted 367 Times in 261 Posts
|
|
Some cornerstones of medicine in blood transfusion:
1930 - Karl Landsteiner, the most important figure in transfusion medicine, who discovered the first three human Blood groups, received the Nobel Prize for Medicine.
1932 - The first facility functioning as a Blood bank was established in a Leningrad Russia hospital.
1937 - Bernard Fantus, director of therapeutics at the Cook County Hospital in Chicago, Illinois (U. S.), established the first hospital Blood bank in the United States. In creating a hospital laboratory that could preserve and store donor Blood, Fantus originated the term 'Blood bank.' Within a few years, hospital and community Blood banks began to be established across the United States. In the U. S., some of the earliest documented were in Cincinnati, Miami, New York and San Francisco.
1939 and 1940 - The Rh Blood group system was discovered by Karl Landsteiner, Alex Wiener, Philip Levine and R. E. Stetson and was soon recognized as the cause of the then majority of transfusion reactions. Known as the Rhesus (Rh) system, once this reliable test for this grouping had been established, transfusion reactions became rare. Identification of the Rh factor has stood next to ABO as another important breakthrough in Blood banking.
1940 - Edwin Cohn, a professor of biological chemistry at Harvard Medical School, developed a cold ethanol fractionation; the process of breaking down plasma into components and products. Albumin, a protein with powerful osmotic properties, plus gamma globulin and fibrinogen were isolated and became available for clinical use. The efficacy of the use of albumin in transfusion was then first demonstrated by John Elliott.
1941 - Isodor Ravdin, a prominent surgeon from Philadelphia, effectively treated victims of the Pearl Harbor attack with Cohn's albumin for shock. Injected into the Blood stream, albumin absorbs liquid from surrounding tissues, preventing Blood vessels from collapsing; the finding associated with shock.
1943 - The introduction by J.F. Loutit and P. L. Mollison of acid citrate dextrose (ACD) solution, which reduces the volume of anticoagulant, permitted transfusions of greater volumes of Blood and longer term Blood storage.
-------
The Allies had various methods of collecting blood and moving it to the fighting front. The British set up a series of storage depots where blood would be received, inspected, refrigerated, and moved forward again. Refrigerated vans would fan out across Britain, collecting blood and delivering it to a centralized medical unit. Technicians at this "home depot" chilled, processed, and readied the blood for shipment overseas. They flew it in insulated crates to large blood banks in the major theaters of military operation. Experts at these units would receive and store the blood, and estimate the need for additional shipments. From there the blood traveled forward to smaller "field transfusion units" -- mobile transfusion stations that could be moved to the action.
The Free French designed a sophisticated system, complete with processing laboratories, vehicles, and propaganda specialists to encourage donation. Exiled from their home country, they set up a central facility, or "Mother House," in Algiers where they collected blood and plasma from volunteers. From there they shipped the liquids to a "Moving Wing" that traveled with the French Expeditionary Corps in Africa, Corsica, and southern France. Blood banks in Tunisia and Morocco also fed the system. The French doctors called their organization O.R.T., for Organisme de Réanimation-Transfusion, or the Transfusion-Rehabilitation System. Blood donation was benevolent, voluntary, and welcomed from all. To the French the system embodied all that was modern and humane, especially in contrast to the values of the fascist enemy.
America processed blood and its derivatives as the industrial giant it was rapidly becoming. The Red Cross collected blood at centers throughout the country, separated the plasma, and shipped it to a network of pharmaceutical labs. They in turn produced freeze-dried plasma and albumin that was flown and shipped to troops overseas. Later in the war, with the advent of portable refrigerators and better preservation techniques, the nation processed whole blood, mostly for the battles of the Pacific. Blood from all over the country was collected and sent to the Naval depot in Oakland, California. There it was packed into insulated boxes, then flown to Hawaii and Guam, where it was re-iced and forwarded to the Pacific islands. Whole blood, carried in portable refrigerators, traveled as far forward as the medical aid stations behind the lines. Medics carried albumin and dried plasma right up to the fighting
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/redgold/basics/bloodonhoof.html
--------
PS.  One issue concerning seriously wounded soldiers was whether some should be sent back to the States on hospital ships. General George Patton had a somewhat unsympathetic answer to this question: "If you have two wounded soldiers, one which a gunshot wound of the lung, and another with an arm or leg blown off, you save the son-of-the-bitch with the lung wound and let the ******* son-of-the-bitch with an amputee arm or leg go to hell. He is no ******* use to us any more".
-------
Hmmm...Not only Germans were ill prepared for winter in 1941 but so wete the US troops in 1944...
Cold injury which was so prevalent among line soldiers in the winter of 1944-45 was for the most part caused by the lack of warm winter clothing and boots. General Omar Bradley described how this had come about as a result of the euphoria that existed among the western allies in September of 1944: "When the rains first came in November with a blast of wintry air, our troops were ill prepared for winter time campaigning. This was traceable in part to the September crisis in supply for, during our race to the Rhine, I had deliberately by-passed shipment of winter clothing in favor of ammunition and gasoline. As a consequence, we now found ourselves caught short, particularly in bad weather footgear. We had gambled in our choice and were now paying for the bad guess."
The winter of 1944-45, was the coldest, wettest winter period western Europe had experienced in thirty years. By late November American officers learned how General Winter could disable an army that was ill-equipped for cold, wet weather. GI field shoes were not waterproof and the dub bin supplied each soldier was probably useless. The symptoms of trench foot were a numbness followed by a painful swelling, and often tissue death and gangrene. In cold feet the small blood vessels constricted, cutting off the blood supply to the extremities. Result was that the small blood vessels and nerve endings were permanently damaged so that the effect of the injury persisted in that the damaged tissue would be unable to resist cold.
More than 45.000 soldiers were hospitalized as cold injury casualties between November, 1944 and April 1945. Men with severely frost-bitten feet were unable to walk and were litter-carried at the front and given bed care in hospitals. In the Third Army, for every ten men evacuated there were six with cold injury. The most likely to suffer cold injury were men with combat boots only and no overshoes
-------
Sulfa drugs and penicillin contributed remarkable to the saving of lives in the European Theater. Each GI in forward positions carried a first-aid packet, complete with bandage, sulfa pills, and sulfa powder. Normally, sulfa drugs do not actually kill bacteria, instead they prevent the microbes from multiplying. The body's regular defenses kill bacteria. The difference between penicillin and sulfa drugs is that sulfa stabilizes the bacteria while penicillin kills the organisms. There were certain problems with penicillin. It was a new drug and still short supply in 1943. However, by D-Day, the combined output of British and American drug companies produced the amounts needed for the Normandy invasion. By June of 1944 penicillin also had become the drug used against syphilis in the ETO.
American soldiers who were hospitalized in Europe recall the frequent penicillin injections endured by many patients in their wards. Penicillin was absorbed rapidly and excreted rapidly through the kidneys, making frequent drug administration essential --- often every four hours, day and night. When it was learned that penicillin could be extracted from urine, an extracting plant was set up at Rhone-Poulenc, France, and penicillin was recovered at the rate of 100000 units (100 doses) of penicillin from 300 liters of urine. The urine was from wounded American soldiers being treated in the Paris district hospitals. The penicillin recovered was used to treat the wounded of the French Army.
The value of anti-biotic was demonstrated by the smaller death rate from disease as compared to World War One. In World War I, pneumonia took the lives of 18000 American soldiers, while World War II, even during the 1944-45 winter, the coldest and wettest in 30 years, only 70 GIs died of pneumonia in the European Theater of Operation.
http://users.skynet.be/bulgecriba/medics.html
--------
[img]smile.gif[/img]
[ 30. January 2003, 07:36 AM: Message edited by: Kai-Petri ]
__________________
|

December 9th, 2002, 10:48 AM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 17,858
Salute!: 707
Saluted 367 Times in 261 Posts
|
|
sulphonamides appeared in the early stages of the war, being used topically as well as systemically. As a result in North Africa, the Mediterranean sunlight provoked photosensitivity and other inflammatory patterns were also noted. Grant Peterkin of Edinburgh, serving in that theatre, wrote of his extensive experience of sulphonamide sensitivity. The first appearance of penicillin was as secret as it was exciting for it was prescribed for Winston Churchill's pneumonia; it was then to become available, most sparingly, for dermatological use. Its effects in the first place seemed nigh to miraculous and were reported by Hellier and Hodgson among others. DDT proved invaluable in eradicating the infestations which scourged so many prison camps. Malaria prophylaxis was vital to preserve a soldier's fighting capability; once this had been assured by the swallowing of a daily mepacrine pill, the improved performance of our forces in the tropics brought added kudos to the medical establishment.
http://www.bad.org.uk/about/history/ww2/
--------
Statistics and Data: in WW2 efficient medical care reduced overall losses to only 4 in each 100 wounded (WW1 8 out of 100) . Better surgery, penicillin, plasma and whole blood are responsible in varying degrees, however the credit must be shared by the entire personnel of the Medical Department, whose painstaking care, surgical skill and devotion to duty under trying conditions saved thousands of lives and preserved the fighting strength of our combat forces ! The soldier with an infection of his wounded leg, or with an open chest wound, or a mutilated face, or an injured brain, was certain to receive, after a short interval, the care of an orthopedic, plastic or neuro surgeon – until he could reach his specialist, the G.I. received the type of care which would get him to that specialist in the best possible condition . Army nurses also gave widely varying types of skilled and sympathetic (=angels) service, some in field hospitals and others in general hospitals farther back . WW2 was also the first war in which nurses automatically held officer rank ! (May 1945 17,314 nurses in ETO) .
Prior to D-Day, June 1944 ETO medical personnel totaled 132, 705, of whom 62,000 were with combat forces and the rest with the Services of Supply (S.O.S.) – by March 1945 the number had increased to 245,387 men . During WW2 the Medical Department’s field forces totaled 13,174 casualties, of which 2,274 were killed . Overall battle casualties in the ETO were as follows: 554,031 men & women (up to V-E Day) . This can be subdivided into KIA = 98,812, WIA = 373,018, MIA = 42,278, POW = 24,783, died of wounds = 15,140 . The percentage among arms and services was split into Infantry = 75.02%, Air Forces = 9.36%, Artillery = 5.40%, Corps of Engineers = 3.03%, Medical Department = 2.47%, Armored Forces = 1.01%, and others = 3.71% . Also, deaths from disease in WW1 were more than 31 times greater than those suffered in WW2, while lost service due to venereal disease (V.D.) was 30 times higher in WW1 than during WW2 … (although WW2 still numbered 606 men who came down with VD each day) .
http://home.att.net/~steinert/wwii_m...department.htm
--------
Found this site so if any interested go ahead..it includes for instance the Spanish civil war
Secondary Wars and Atrocities of the Twentieth Century
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat3.htm
__________________
|

January 30th, 2003, 12:36 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 17,858
Salute!: 707
Saluted 367 Times in 261 Posts
|
|
In 1943 concern still existed that the Germans might have prepared extensively for bacteriological warfare; had they, for example, already inoculated their troops against any specific virus?
In August 1943 George Merck, director of the War Research Service (the controlling body for bacteriological warfare in the United States) had proposed to the British experts at Porton that RAMC medics and American medical officers collaborate in sampling the blood of German prisoners of war.
Dr Paul Fildes, the head of the Biology Section, Experimental Station, Porton, near Salisbury, who was almost entirely responsible for the work, replied on September 8 that he thought nothing useful would come of such an investigation.
On May 21, 1944 Churchill wrote to Ismay reminding him that great progress had been made in bacteriological warfare, and Britain had ordered half a million bombs from American for use should this mode of warfare be employed by the Germans.
'I think we should be in a position to make and fill these bombs here,' he suggested, but was concerned that putting this before the chiefs of staff would widen the circle of those in the know.
On April 21, 1944 Fildes submitted a report on the operational tests with the four-pound 'N' bomb. These trials had produced in part catastrophic results - 'Even in our operations with N,' he would report some months later, 'we did not succeed in keeping our agents within bounds and have created conditions which will require consideration after the war.'
The bomb would be scattered in clusters over a two hundred yard square patch releasing their toxin as an odourless aerosol cloud which would cause death by inhalation of half the human beings up to a mile downwind from it, or up to two miles if they were running (the risk increasing with exertion).
Taking the city of Stuttgart as an example, the scientist assessed that a BW raid would need nearly two thousand clustered projectiles (each one being a five hundred pound container of the four-pound anthrax bombs); these could be carried by 83 Stirlings, 142 Lancasters, or 166 American B-17s and B-24s, and ideally be released simultaneously at the end of a conventional HE attack.
'An operation of this short,' promised Fildes, 'should kill a considerable number of people, either rapidly by inhalation or ore slowly by skin infection.'
In June 1944, the War Cabinet appointed an inter-Service sub-committee on Biological Warfare. They learned that no definite order had yet been placed in the United States for the manufacture of 'N' bombs; further trials were still being conducted on these frightful weapons. Churchill had however authorised top priority for all counter-measures to BW, and possible collaboration with SOE on BW operations.
Fildes now (July 21) reported again on BW. On August 14, he re-evaluated the half-million bomb order, and decided that the saturation figures needed revising.
At that time (January 6, 1944) they had believed that ten clusters would saturate one square mile, and that the six cities selected - Aachen, Wilhelmshaven, Stuttgart, Frankfurt, Hamburg and Berlin - would have 538 square miles of built up territories. This would require 570,280 anthrax bombs.
http://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/WSC/Bwar1.html
__________________
|

January 31st, 2003, 02:34 AM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,413
Salute!: 43
Saluted 34 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
I live on an old army base from WWII called Camp Swift and there are still alot of items left over from the 1940's. In a creek near my house are alot of blood transfusion kits. They put a small rubber hose and two HUGE needles inside a sealed tin can. These cans are rusting now so the needles are out in the open. Anyway if you are as big a coward as I am when it comes to needles, they could have shot my Mother and I would have not donated any blood due to the large size of the needles they used.
__________________
I need a bailout of only $500,000
|

January 31st, 2003, 11:38 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bloomington, IN
Posts: 659
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
Whoh, really? Heck, if you can get ahold of any thrown-away WWII medical stuff, lemme know! That's one of my main interests!
|

January 31st, 2003, 05:33 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 3,413
Salute!: 43
Saluted 34 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
I will take a look this week end and see what is left. Most of the cans are rusted out, so all that is left is the rubber hose and the big needles. You can look through the end and see day light with no problem ! That is how big these things were.
__________________
I need a bailout of only $500,000
|

March 2nd, 2003, 12:20 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 17,858
Salute!: 707
Saluted 367 Times in 261 Posts
|
|
On "Truth" serums:
A sure-fire truth drug has been high on the wish list of U.S. intelligence agencies at least since 1942, when scientists working for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the CIA’s wartime predecessor, were asked to develop a chemical substance that could break down the psychological defenses of enemy spies and POWs, thereby making it easier to obtain information from them.
After testing several compounds, the OSS scientists selected a potent extract of marijuana as the best available "truth serum." The cannabis concoction was given the code name TD, meaning Truth Drug. When injected into food or tobacco cigarettes, TD helped loosen the reserve of recalcitrant interrogation subjects.
In 1947, the U.S. Navy launched Project Chatter, which included experiments with mescaline, a hallucinogenic drug derived from the peyote cactus (with effects similar to LSD). Mescaline was studied as a possible speech-inducing agent after the Navy learned that Nazi doctors at the Dachau concentration camp had used it in mind-control experiments. The Nazis concluded that it was “impossible to impose one’s will on another person, even when the strongest dose of mescaline had been given.”
http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0604-06.htm
------------
The classic "truth serum" is sodium pentothal, which is basically an anesthetic.
http://www.strategypage.com/dls/articles/20020429.asp
----------
Barbiturates such as scopolamine, sodium amytal, and sodium pentothal were first touted as truth serums in the early 20th century. Because they inhibit control of the central nervous system, truth serums were supposed to induce a hypnotic "twilight" state that elicited a mechanical recitation of truth. In reality, though, the only good truth serums are found in bad science fiction.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2057471/
http://www.a1b2c3.com/drugs/lsd09.htm
__________________
|

March 7th, 2003, 10:41 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Citizen of the world, though quite misantropic!
Posts: 6,506
Salute!: 15
Saluted 26 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
Well. I think you all know about the Japanese using bombs with thousands of fleas infected with plague. They used them at China with devastating effects and in their balloon bombs sent to the USA...
__________________
"War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." - Jean Dutourd, French veteran of both world wars
"A mon fils: depuis que tes yeux sont fermes les miens n’ont cessé de pleurir." - Mère française, Verdun
|

March 17th, 2003, 12:40 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 17,858
Salute!: 707
Saluted 367 Times in 261 Posts
|
|
Trench foot
If you thought this was "not a big deal"...
Check this picture if you dare...
www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWfoot.jpg
Trench foot was one of the most widespread and debilitating that affected men from both sides of the lines, it is linked with WW1 hence the name "Trench foot". The disease's origin isn't in WW1 but was first noted in Napoleons army in 1812. It was on the retreat from Russia that it became prevalent, and was first described by Larrey. He observed that this condition didn't occur during the freezing cold of the campaign but when the temperature was near to zero degrees with the presence of moisture. Here lies the clue. During the First war men were exposed to Cold but not freezing conditions often up to their ankles in water that was permanently in the bottom of the trenches. The feet would swell, appear red and blood blistered, the pain would be severe, until the sensory nerves had been damaged and would then be numb causing the man to be evacuated hopefully. The treatment would be basically to elevate the limb, some modest warmth and wait. After a few weeks the limb would return to normal in most cases, but some severe ones that became gangrenous could result in amputation, with all the complications that went with that, some of those that did recover would have nerve damage. . As for the battalion pride in having low trench foot rates, some cases could be prevented with care. Some situations made trench foot more likely, such as poor fitting boots restriciting the circulation, immobility, amount of water and temperature of water in the base of the trench. Some of the preventative measures used were the issuing of gumboots where possible, but keeping feet dry was impossible. I have read accounts of men being forced to apply whale grease to the feet i presume to impart some waterproofness to them. Either way I believe some cases were practically unavoidable, and must have been the devil itself if you got it. The army went to great lengths to find out how to prevent it, employing hygienists, doctors all sorts and the general conclusion was military discipline and good hygiene. That meant where possible boots off and foot inspections carried out, greasing, and charging men who appeared to be neglecting these instructions, remember that there would be individuals who would deliberately contract this illness to get out of the line. Nowadays this illness is still known as trench foot or immersion foot, on the Falklands campaign it amounted to 14% of casualties.
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homep...let1/tfoot.htm
Controlling the negative effect of winter on front line forces was a critical aspect of combat management. The phenomenon of "trench foot" was one of the important considerations. Bradley had wrestled with the basic problem of replacing battle casualties and was discussing it with Eisenhower when they received the first reports of the German Ardennes offensive. As Bradley wrote later, "Within five short weeks, the winter attack had cost us 64,000 casualties . . . And, as if this were not already a strain, on the bankrupt replacement system, trench foot added almost 12,000 more. Though listed as non-battle loss, trench foot exacted its heaviest toll among the riflemen on the line . . .because the malady caught us unaware partially as a result of our own neglect. By the time we disciplined troops to the care and treatment of wet feet, the infirmity had fallen upon us with the suddenness of a plague." Bradley accepted responsibility for having held up shipment of winter clothing in favor of ammunition and gasoline in support for the race eastward.
http://www.wood.army.mil/2-10IN/Hist...0Bulge%20I.htm
Something interesting from the same site:
Bill observed that by the time the 10th had received its winter clothing, while still in the Saar area, his people had become so ensured to the less warm attire that for some the Army's winter boots seemed too warm. He wasn't aware of this until a doctor came to report something "strange" -- he was treating men in U.S. uniforms that were wearing German boots. When Bill checked into it, he found that the men were taking boots from German soldiers because their own were "too hot."285 Meanwhile, Germans were seizing American boots when the opportunity presented itself.
__________________
|

August 25th, 2007, 04:10 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 17,858
Salute!: 707
Saluted 367 Times in 261 Posts
|
|
Re: BLOOD TRANSFUSION AND ANTIBIOTICS etc IN WW2
Nursing and medicine in WW2
Pics and stories
For example the doctor´s view from St Nazaire- operation Chariot
BBC - WW2 People's War - Photo Gallery: Nursing and Medicine
__________________
|

August 25th, 2007, 07:01 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where Iron Crosses grow
Posts: 8,777
Salute!: 183
Saluted 142 Times in 111 Posts
|
|
Re: BLOOD TRANSFUSION AND ANTIBIOTICS etc IN WW2
Very interesting thread, thanks for bringing it back
__________________
Quousque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra...
|

September 2nd, 2007, 03:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: BLOOD TRANSFUSION AND ANTIBIOTICS etc IN WW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai-Petri
|
...Or Thiopentone as we call it in the UK. It is indeed an anaesthitic induction agent, and is still in use today for patients undergoing emergency anaesthesia/surgery where getting the patient off to sleep quickly is necessary, its also a good choice for people with epilepsy, and is also used when people are allergic to more modern agents.
I believe it is part of the 'lethal injection' too. Which is just a seriously heavy duty anaesthetic with a little something to screw the heart up. I think its Thiopentone, Pancuronium, and Potassium.
|

September 2nd, 2007, 10:26 PM
|
 |
War Correspondent
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,914
Salute!: 235
Saluted 223 Times in 176 Posts
|
|
Re: BLOOD TRANSFUSION AND ANTIBIOTICS etc IN WW2
Nice thread, hadn't noticed it before. I recently acquired Lifeline, a wartime Ministry of Information book about the blood transfusion service. It gives a great insight.
|

September 2nd, 2007, 11:14 PM
|
 |
WW2F Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,570
Salute!: 0
Saluted 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: BLOOD TRANSFUSION AND ANTIBIOTICS etc IN WW2
What about morphine? Did both Allies and Axis powers use this?
|

November 9th, 2007, 03:19 AM
|
 |
Proud Daughter of a Canadian WWII Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 2,794
Salute!: 306
Saluted 322 Times in 192 Posts
|
|
Re: BLOOD TRANSFUSION AND ANTIBIOTICS etc IN WW2
Methadone or a derivative was also used as a pain killer by Germany:
From History of Methadone
The discovery of methadone
The origins of the research
In 1939 Otto Eisleb and a colleague O Schaumann, scientists working for the large chemicals conglomerate I G Farbenindustrie at Hoechst-Am-Main, Germany, discovered an effective opioid analgesic drug which they numbered compound 8909 and called Dolantin.3 This was the discovery of pethidine. As with diamorphine (heroin) before, and buprenorphine (Temgesic) since, the early hopes of it being 'a new non-addictive analgesic' were not realised.
However the powerful analgesic action of pethidine was much needed during the Second World War. It was being produced commercially by 19393 and at the height of the war in 1944 annual production had risen to 1600 kg.4
Meanwhile close colleagues Max Bockmühl and Gustav Ehrhart were working on compounds with a similar structure to Dolantin in the hope of finding: - Water-soluble hypnotic (sleep-inducing) substances5
- Effective drugs to slow the gastrointestinal tract to make surgery easier6
- Effective analgesics that were structurally dissimilar to morphine - in the hope that they would be non-addictive5 and escape the strict controls on opiates.
There is no evidence, as had been widely believed both here and in the USA, that they were working as part of a German attempt, directed by Hitler, to replace opium supplies which had been cut off by the war.
This myth has been widely expanded to attributing one of methadone's first trade names - Dolophine - to being a derivation of Adolf and even that it was called Adolophine in Germany - the 'A' being dropped after the war. In fact the name Dolophine was created for the drug as a trade name after the war by the Eli-Lilly pharmaceutical company in America. It was probably derived from the French dolor (pain) and fin (end).6
The discovery of 'Hoechst 10820': methadone
During 1937 and the spring and summer of 1938 Bockmühl and Ehrhart worked on the creation of another new substance in the group which they called 'Hoechst 10820' and, later, polamidon.
A patent application was filed on 11 September 1941 and the discovery was formally credited to Bockmühl and Ehrhart (see overleaf).7
It has been asserted that because the new compound's two-dimensional structure had no resemblance to morphine its pain-killing properties were not recognised until after the war had ended.6 But although the town of Hoechst was extensively bombed during the war the I G Farbenindustrie factory suffered only slight damage and so limited experimental work was able to continue, stopping only when supplies of coal ran out or when the rail links were broken. In the autumn of 1942, after it had been determined that the drug was both an analgesic and a spasmolytic, it was handed over to the military for further testing under the code name Amidon.8 There was no attempt to try and get polamidon production levels up to those of pethidine. Construction continued at Hoechst on a new pethidine production plant.4
An explanation for it not being exploited more fully between 1939 and 1945 was given by Dr K K Chen - an American doctor who did much of the early clinical research work after the war - who said a former employee of I G Farbenindustrie had told him in personal correspondence that they had discounted its use because of the side effects.8 Chen presumed that the doses used in the experiments had been too high, causing nausea, overdose etc.
After the war
All German patents and trade names, including those for polamidon, were requisitioned by the allies as spoils of war. The I G Farbenindustrie factory was in a US occupation zone and therefore came under American management. The US Foreign Economic Management Department sent a 'Technical Industrial Intelligence Committee' team of 4 men (Kleiderer, Rice, Conquest and Williams) to investigate the war-time work at Hoechst.
In 1945 The Kleiderer report was published by the US Department of Commerce Intelligence. For the first time in print it reported the findings of Bockmühl and Ehrhart; and that despite having a different structure, polamidon closely mimicked the pharmacological action of morphine.9
The formula was distributed around the world and exploited by many companies, which is why it has so many different trade names. As a result this production of analgesics, which was no longer commercially viable, practically stopped at Hoechst after the war. The pethidine plant, by then half finished, was instead dedicated to the production of penicillin.4 The I G Farbenindustrie empire was broken up by the allies and the plant that had developed methadone became part of a new company called Hoechst A G
|

April 23rd, 2008, 06:39 PM
|
 |
Kenraali 
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 17,858
Salute!: 707
Saluted 367 Times in 261 Posts
|
|
Re: BLOOD TRANSFUSION AND ANTIBIOTICS etc IN WW2
Project MUSE
The fact that Germany failed to produce sufficient penicillin to meet its military requirements is one of the major enigmas of the Second World War. Although Germany lost many scientists through imprisonment and forced or voluntary emigration, those biochemists that remained should have been able to have achieved the large-scale production of penicillin. After all, they had access to Fleming's original papers, and from 1940 the work of Florey and co-workers detailing how penicillin could be purified; in addition, with effort, they should have been able to obtain cultures of Fleming's penicillin-producing mold.There seems then to have been no overriding reason why the Germans and their Axis allies could not have produced large amounts of penicillin from early on in the War. They did produce some penicillin, but never in amounts remotely close to that produced by the Allies who, from D-Day onwards, had an almost limitless supply.
__________________
|

April 23rd, 2008, 09:01 PM
|
 |
Ace
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where Iron Crosses grow
Posts: 8,777
Salute!: 183
Saluted 142 Times in 111 Posts
|
|
Re: BLOOD TRANSFUSION AND ANTIBIOTICS etc IN WW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai-Petri
In August 1943 George Merck, director of the War Research Service (the controlling body for bacteriological warfare in the United States)
|
Fabulous thread, thank you again Kai!
Would this gentleman have anything to do with Merck labs or is this coincidence only?
__________________
Quousque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra...
|

May 15th, 2009, 12:07 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Harbor Springs, Michigan
Posts: 395
Salute!: 36
Saluted 39 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: BLOOD TRANSFUSION AND ANTIBIOTICS etc IN WW2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai-Petri
Project MUSE
The fact that Germany failed to produce sufficient penicillin to meet its military requirements is one of the major enigmas of the Second World War. Although Germany lost many scientists through imprisonment and forced or voluntary emigration, those biochemists that remained should have been able to have achieved the large-scale production of penicillin. After all, they had access to Fleming's original papers, and from 1940 the work of Florey and co-workers detailing how penicillin could be purified; in addition, with effort, they should have been able to obtain cultures of Fleming's penicillin-producing mold. There seems then to have been no overriding reason why the Germans and their Axis allies could not have produced large amounts of penicillin from early on in the War. They did produce some penicillin, but never in amounts remotely close to that produced by the Allies who, from D-Day onwards, had an almost limitless supply.
|
They simply had not discovered and had no access to a good method of mass production of PCN. Given time, I'm sure the Germans would have eventually come up with their own method, but that is the nature of scientific and technological discovery. Despite having a long and glorious tradition in chemistry, medicine and pharmaceuticals, that confers no lock on the ability to always be first.
I'm sure if I spent a little more time I could quote a better source than Wiki but here is the basic history. Penicillin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
Mass production
The challenge of mass-producing the drug was daunting. On March 14, 1942 the first patient was treated for streptococcal septicemia with U.S.-made penicillin produced by Merck & Co.[12] Half of the total supply produced at the time was used on that one patient. By June 1942 there was just enough U.S. penicillin available to treat ten patients.[13] A moldy cantaloupe in a Peoria, Illinois market in 1943 was found to contain the best and highest-quality penicillin after a worldwide search.[14] The discovery of the cantaloupe, and the results of fermentation research on corn-steep liquid at the Northern Regional Research Laboratory at Peoria, Illinois, allowed the USA to produce 2.3 million doses in time for the invasion of Normandy in the spring of 1944. Large-scale production resulted from the development of deep-tank fermentation by chemical engineer Margaret Hutchinson Rousseau.[15]

Penicillin was being mass-produced in 1944
G. Raymond Rettew made a significant contribution to the American war effort by his techniques to produce commercial quantities of penicillin.[16] During World War II, penicillin made a major difference in the number of deaths and amputations caused by infected wounds among Allied forces, saving an estimated 12%–15% of lives.[citation needed] Availability was severely limited, however, by the difficulty of manufacturing large quantities of penicillin and by the rapid renal clearance of the drug, necessitating frequent dosing. Penicillin is actively secreted, and about 80% of a penicillin dose is cleared from the body within three to four hours of administration. Indeed, during the early penicillin era, the drug was so scarce and so highly valued that it became common to collect the urine from patients being treated, so that the penicillin in the urine could be isolated and reused.[17]
This was not a satisfactory solution, so researchers looked for a way to slow penicillin secretion. They hoped to find a molecule that could compete with penicillin for the organic acid transporter responsible for secretion, such that the transporter would preferentially secrete the competing molecule and the penicillin would be retained. The uricosuric agent probenecid proved to be suitable. When probenecid and penicillin are administered together, probenecid competitively inhibits the secretion of penicillin, increasing penicillin's concentration and prolonging its activity. Eventually, the advent of mass-production techniques and semi-synthetic penicillins resolved the supply issues, so this use of probenecid declined.[17] Probenecid is still useful, however, for certain infections requiring particularly high concentrations of penicillins.[18]
|
Also from About.com: http://www.invent.org/hall_of_fame/107.html
Quote:
Andrew J. Moyer
Born Nov 30 1899 - Died Feb 17 1959 </B>
Method for Production of Penicillin
Penicillin
Patent Number(s) 2,442,141; 2,443,989
Inducted 1987
Andrew J. Moyer's discoveries provided the foundation for the industrial production of penicillin.
The potential of using penicillin to treat wounded soldiers was immediately recognized in World War II. However the concept of antibiotics was new, and a practical method for large-scale production was not available. Treatments required from 1-2 million Oxford units of the substance. The urgency of finding a method for mass-producing penicillin led to international cooperation.
In the United States, the task was assigned to Moyer, who found that by culturing the Penicillium mold in a culture broth comprising corn steep liquor and lactose, penicillin yields could be increased many fold. This was the first known use of corn steep liquor for growing microorganisms.
Moyer also discovered that with this improved medium, the fermentation could be conducted with continuous shaking, thereby further enhancing the yields and production rate.
Invention Impact
These discoveries led to industrial penicillin production, which saved thousands of lives during the war.
Moyer's work also provided a model for the development of all other antibiotic fermentations. Corn steep liquor is still used in the commercial fermentation processes for making penicillin and many other antibiotics. Moyer contributed to 10 U.S. patents.
Born in Star City, Indiana, Moyer received his A.B. degree from Wabash College in 1922, studied at the University of Wisconsin from 1922 to 1923, and received a M.S. from North Dakota Agricultural College in 1925. In 1929 he was awarded his Ph.D. in plant pathology from the University of Maryland.
Moyer was employed as a mycologist with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Chemistry and Soils, from 1929 until 1940 then worked as a microbiologist at the USDA Northern Regional Research Laboratory in Peoria, Illinois, until his retirement in 1957.
|
Also History of Penicillin - Alexander Fleming - John Sheehan - Andrew Moyer
Quote:
Dr. Howard Florey
It was not until 1939 that Dr. Howard Florey, a future Nobel Laureate, and three colleagues at Oxford University began intensive research and were able to demonstrate penicillin's ability to kill infectious bacteria. As the war with Germany continued to drain industrial and government resources, the British scientists could not produce the quantities of penicillin needed for clinical trials on humans and turned to the United States for help. They were quickly referred to the Peoria Lab where scientists were already working on fermentation methods to increase the growth rate of fungal cultures. One July 9, 1941, Howard Florey and Norman Heatley, Oxford University Scientists came to the U.S. with a small but valuable package containing a small amount of penicillin to begin work.
Pumping air into deep vats containing corn steep liquor (a non-alcoholic by-product of the wet milling process) and the addition of other key ingredients was shown to produce faster growth and larger amounts of penicillin than the previous surface-growth method. Ironically, after a worldwide search, it was a strain of penicillin from a moldy cantaloupe in a Peoria market that was found and improved to produce the largest amount of penicillin when grown in the deep vat, submerged conditions.
Andrew J. Moyer
By November 26, 1941, Andrew J. Moyer, the lab's expert on the nutrition of molds, had succeeded, with the assistance of Dr. Heatley, in increasing the yields of penicillin 10 times. In 1943, the required clinical trials were performed and penicillin was shown to be the most effective antibacterial agent to date. Penicillin production was quickly scaled up and available in quantity to treat Allied soldiers wounded on D-Day. As production was increased, the price dropped from nearly priceless in 1940, to $20 per dose in July 1943, to $0.55 per dose by 1946.
As a result of their work, two members of the British group were awarded the Nobel Prize. Dr. Andrew J. Moyer from the Peoria Lab was inducted into the Inventors Hall of Fame and both the British and Peoria Laboratories were designated as International Historic Chemical Landmarks.
Andrew J Moyer Patent
On May 25, 1948, Andrew J Moyer was granted a patent for a method of the mass production of penicillin.
|
And this also http://explorepahistory.com/hmarker.php?markerId=974
Quote:
Name: G. Raymond Rettew
Region: Philadelphia and its Countryside/Lehigh Valley
County Location: Chester
Marker Location: Walnut and Chestnut Streets, West Chester
Dedication Date: September 17, 2002
Marker Text
A West Chester chemist, he pioneered the mass production of penicillin, the world's first antibiotic. In 1943, with Wyeth Laboratories, his lab, (a converted auto-repair shop here) made and sent more penicillin to the Armed Forces than any other lab in the world, saving countless lives on the battlefields of World War II.
Behind the Marker
On August 1, 1944, a German 88mm artillery shell detonated near U.S. infantryman Murphy Higginbotham, sending shards of metal through his right leg and shoulder, and into the left side of his back. While Higginbotham recuperated in a hospital a letter arrived from his parents in Texas. Incapacitated and unable to respond, Higginbotham had a friend write about his progress. "I got your letter of September 4th with Murphy's address [at the hospital]. So, I checked up and found where he was located, and left the same afternoon," he wrote. "At first they thought they would have to take his leg off. You see, it was long before they really could treat him, as it should have been, and the doctor said that when he first got there it was such a dirty wound, and had gas gangrene. But, they started treating him with the new ‘wonder drug" penicillin and it brought him around ok."
During World War II, American soldiers had a greater chance of surviving wounds...
Credit: The Franklin D. Roosevelt Library.
Several months later, in an Italian hospital, bacteria ravaged the body of British Army sergeant Len Scott. What began as a minor case of athlete's foot turned into ugly boils that spread out along his legs. Doctors called it "diphtheria of the skin." In several weeks the inflammation spread to his arms and hands. "Medical conferences at the foot of my still-too-small-bed were more frequent. I heard a new word mentioned—penicillin. …Things grew better, sores disappeared."
Before the introduction of penicillin in World War II, wounded soldiers were more likely to die of bacterial infections than from their wounds. With inadequate knowledge of how the body healed itself, doctors often were encouraged by the presence of "laudable pus." Others sought to treat the after effects of infection, like gas gangrene, with hydrochloric acid. Penicillin, however, which halts the division of the bacteria, could treat infection at its source.
The chemotherapeutic attributes of penicillin had first been discovered by Alexander Fleming in 1928. In the 1930s, Oxford scientists Howard Florey and Ernst Boris proved the antibiotic's capabilities when mice infected with lethal amount of bacteria fully recovered after the scientists injected them with pure doses of penicillin developed from a specimen of Fleming's mold. News of Florey and Chain's achievement soon reached a quiet young Pennsylvania scientist, Granville Raymond Rettew. Born in West Chester on April 19, 1903, Rettew had studied chemistry at the University of Delaware and Swarthmore College. While employed by the Charles E. Hines Company in Philadelphia, he had become interested in improving mushroom growth by refining the production of mushroom spawn, a mixture of mycelium root structure and sterilized cereal grain that Hines sold to mushroom growers.
By the fall of 1943, Raymond Rettew's Walnut Street Laboratory in West Chester...
Credit: Courtesy of the Chester County Historical Society, Westchester, Pa.
Convinced that the mushroom cultivators "needed scientific study and help," Rettew founded the Chester County Mushroom Laboratories in West Chester and began systematizing the production of quality, marketable spawn in sophisticated labs that boasted sterile air-conditioned growing rooms and UV lights. A tireless tinkerer, Rettew patented a device for collecting mushroom spawn and collaborated with food packagers to develop new processes for freezing produce.
When not developing better spawn, better insecticides, or better mushrooms, Rettew was in his lab working on his "hobby": the extraction of useful compounds from mushrooms. The United States" entry into the World War II in December 1941 prompted the mycologist to assess "whether or not there was anything which could be of help to the War effort." His hobby, Rettew rightly figured, had potential benefits for American fighting man. Having studied penicillin intermittently since 1928, Rettew knew of Florey and Chain's research. He also knew that by altering the culture, or medium in which the mycelium grew, he could improve the quality of the spawn. He figured the same process would apply to penicillin growth. "This," he wrote in his memoirs, "would be our way of contributing to the War effort."
|
__________________
"I do not have to tell you who won the war. You know, the artillery did." - Gen. George S. Patton
"In 9 months and 3 days of combat on the Continent the 949th FA Bn had fired 51,000 rounds of ammunition, approximately 2,550 tons." - Unit History
Last edited by DocCasualty; May 15th, 2009 at 12:23 PM.
Reason: Additions
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:24 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright © 2000 - 2010, the World War II Network, all rights reserved.
|
 |