|
Of course I am, Kai!!! [img]tongue.gif[/img] [img]tongue.gif[/img]
All the things you said are true, indeed. But Rommel was not as good when it came to frontal attacks, defense, static and attrition fighting. Look at El Alamein (and of course, he had many disadvantages on his side). He also was not very good when commanding a very large number of men. He was a tactician more than a strategist. His inventions for the desert warfare and his improvements for the dfense of Normandy were spectacular, there is no doubt that the man was a genious, but he was not as incredible as oftenly is thought. I think Erich von Manstein was far better, more complete, he had some weaknesses, but were very little and in general, his skills included every kind of tactic and therefore, he was a strategist.
What about Eduard Dietl? He was a kind of ugly Rommel, because he was not as handsome, but he did have the same charm, genious tactics and the love of his men... [img]smile.gif[/img]
__________________
"War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." - Jean Dutourd, French veteran of both world wars
"A mon fils: depuis que tes yeux sont fermes les miens n’ont cessé de pleurir." - Mère française, Verdun
|