Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

All right boys, the easiest Poll Ever: Was Monty over-rated?

Discussion in 'WWII General' started by Carl G. E. von Mannerheim, Jan 2, 2004.

  1. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,469
    Likes Received:
    2,208
    BTW,

    is Montgomery of El Alamein his knighthood name or just the name of a book?

    :confused:
     
  2. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,163
    Likes Received:
    3,271
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    His knighthood name, I think Kai.
    Viscount Montgomery of Alamein.


    Regards,
    Gordon
     
  3. Mahross

    Mahross Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    London, UK
    Another problem that Monty had was that he could be quite vindictive to people he didn't like. For example when Slim took over as CIGS in 1948 he was left in a position of what to do about the issue of National Service. This was an issue left over from Monty's tenure of service. It would appear he did this as Slim was not his choice, he preffered Crocker, whom he had already informed that this would happen. He was then rebuked by Attlee who told him it would be Slim. Therefore, it would seem he left this problem for Slim to solve. With the issue of telling Crocker of his 'new' position, it was not the first time he had over stepped the boundary of appointing people to positions. when he became CIGS he informed his Chief of Staff from his 21st Army Group days, De Guingand, that he would become VCIGS. In this he was again overruled. So one of Monty's main failling would appear that he believed he had more power than he did and often over stepped that mark.
     
  4. Mahross

    Mahross Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    London, UK
    Another problem that Monty had was that he could be quite vindictive to people he didn't like. For example when Slim took over as CIGS in 1948 he was left in a position of what to do about the issue of National Service. This was an issue left over from Monty's tenure of service. It would appear he did this as Slim was not his choice, he preffered Crocker, whom he had already informed that this would happen. He was then rebuked by Attlee who told him it would be Slim. Therefore, it would seem he left this problem for Slim to solve. With the issue of telling Crocker of his 'new' position, it was not the first time he had over stepped the boundary of appointing people to positions. when he became CIGS he informed his Chief of Staff from his 21st Army Group days, De Guingand, that he would become VCIGS. In this he was again overruled. So one of Monty's main failling would appear that he believed he had more power than he did and often over stepped that mark.
     
  5. Mahross

    Mahross Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    London, UK
    Another problem that Monty had was that he could be quite vindictive to people he didn't like. For example when Slim took over as CIGS in 1948 he was left in a position of what to do about the issue of National Service. This was an issue left over from Monty's tenure of service. It would appear he did this as Slim was not his choice, he preffered Crocker, whom he had already informed that this would happen. He was then rebuked by Attlee who told him it would be Slim. Therefore, it would seem he left this problem for Slim to solve. With the issue of telling Crocker of his 'new' position, it was not the first time he had over stepped the boundary of appointing people to positions. when he became CIGS he informed his Chief of Staff from his 21st Army Group days, De Guingand, that he would become VCIGS. In this he was again overruled. So one of Monty's main failling would appear that he believed he had more power than he did and often over stepped that mark.
     
  6. Mahross

    Mahross Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    London, UK
    Another problem that Monty had was that he could be quite vindictive to people he didn't like. For example when Slim took over as CIGS in 1948 he was left in a position of what to do about the issue of National Service. This was an issue left over from Monty's tenure of service. It would appear he did this as Slim was not his choice, he preffered Crocker, whom he had already informed that this would happen. He was then rebuked by Attlee who told him it would be Slim. Therefore, it would seem he left this problem for Slim to solve. With the issue of telling Crocker of his 'new' position, it was not the first time he had over stepped the boundary of appointing people to positions. when he became CIGS he informed his Chief of Staff from his 21st Army Group days, De Guingand, that he would become VCIGS. In this he was again overruled. So one of Monty's main failling would appear that he believed he had more power than he did and often over stepped that mark.
     
  7. Mahross

    Mahross Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    London, UK
    Another problem that Monty had was that he could be quite vindictive to people he didn't like. For example when Slim took over as CIGS in 1948 he was left in a position of what to do about the issue of National Service. This was an issue left over from Monty's tenure of service. It would appear he did this as Slim was not his choice, he preffered Crocker, whom he had already informed that this would happen. He was then rebuked by Attlee who told him it would be Slim. Therefore, it would seem he left this problem for Slim to solve. With the issue of telling Crocker of his 'new' position, it was not the first time he had over stepped the boundary of appointing people to positions. when he became CIGS he informed his Chief of Staff from his 21st Army Group days, De Guingand, that he would become VCIGS. In this he was again overruled. So one of Monty's main failling would appear that he believed he had more power than he did and often over stepped that mark.
     
  8. Mahross

    Mahross Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    London, UK
    Another problem that Monty had was that he could be quite vindictive to people he didn't like. For example when Slim took over as CIGS in 1948 he was left in a position of what to do about the issue of National Service. This was an issue left over from Monty's tenure of service. It would appear he did this as Slim was not his choice, he preffered Crocker, whom he had already informed that this would happen. He was then rebuked by Attlee who told him it would be Slim. Therefore, it would seem he left this problem for Slim to solve. With the issue of telling Crocker of his 'new' position, it was not the first time he had over stepped the boundary of appointing people to positions. when he became CIGS he informed his Chief of Staff from his 21st Army Group days, De Guingand, that he would become VCIGS. In this he was again overruled. So one of Monty's main failling would appear that he believed he had more power than he did and often over stepped that mark.
     
  9. Mahross

    Mahross Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    London, UK
    Another problem that Monty had was that he could be quite vindictive to people he didn't like. For example when Slim took over as CIGS in 1948 he was left in a position of what to do about the issue of National Service. This was an issue left over from Monty's tenure of service. It would appear he did this as Slim was not his choice, he preffered Crocker, whom he had already informed that this would happen. He was then rebuked by Attlee who told him it would be Slim. Therefore, it would seem he left this problem for Slim to solve. With the issue of telling Crocker of his 'new' position, it was not the first time he had over stepped the boundary of appointing people to positions. when he became CIGS he informed his Chief of Staff from his 21st Army Group days, De Guingand, that he would become VCIGS. In this he was again overruled. So one of Monty's main failling would appear that he believed he had more power than he did and often over stepped that mark.
     
  10. Mahross

    Mahross Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    London, UK
    Sorry guys message ocurred several times. Computer probs :eek:
     
  11. Mahross

    Mahross Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    London, UK
    Sorry guys message ocurred several times. Computer probs :eek:
     
  12. DUCE

    DUCE Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    0
    *whistles* very close poll indeed. last I checked it was 46% for yes and 54% no.

    From the books I've read, I'd have to say that he'd be a general I'd follow. I don't think he's over-rated at all.

    DUCE
     
  13. KnightMove

    KnightMove Ace

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2003
    Messages:
    1,196
    Likes Received:
    8
    In fact the question is not precise enough to enable significant results. Monty is overrated by his fans and underrated by his foes... if there would be another poll "Was Monty underrated?", I would also vote yes. Patton did most certainly underrate Monty. I think many of the users who votes 'no' will agree that he is partly overrated, but taking into account that he was also underrated, they vote no. So this is in fact not an easy question, but very tricky... [​IMG]
     
  14. Friedrich

    Friedrich Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,548
    Likes Received:
    52
    Knight is right! ;) Good post! [​IMG]

    That is what made it really hard for me to answer. I do really admire Monty and I have him in high regard. But his much fame made him being much greater than he really was. But certainly he has been underrated a lot too. Thanks to Ambrose in a great shape... :rolleyes:
     
  15. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,469
    Likes Received:
    2,208
    Of course if we ask the question from the soldier´s view who was the most greeted and celebrated General as he came to visit the men I guess Monty was on the top spot?
     
  16. sapper

    sapper British Normandy Veteran, Royal Engineers

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2002
    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    204
    Having fought our way from Sword Beach to Bremen, though I departed during the battles for Overloon and Venraij, the men on the ground thought that Monty was the "bees knees" he never wasted mens lives, he would not put up with failure by his officers, he was a great stragitist, he captured Normandy some time before the date planned, AND! with the crushing defeat of the enemy at Falaise.

    That could have been even more crushing had Patton not been off on his "ego trip" of capturing "Empty Countryside" land where no enemy was!

    Had he joined his American forces along with the British and Canadians trying to force the neck of the bag closed. Then Monty's reputation would have been even greater.

    But Patton was enjoying his "ego trip" sailing away where there were no enemy, why should he? indeed, have joined the battle at the neck of the "bag" American, British, and Canadian troops and officers were being killed there! Just imagine how the war would have been shortened had Pattons armour joined in the battle.Instead he was sitting miles away from the real war, and had run out of fuel. It is just as well that there was not a SS Panzer battle group near. I think that what is written here is pretty much the opinion of the Allied troops.
    Sapper
     
  17. sapper

    sapper British Normandy Veteran, Royal Engineers

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2002
    Messages:
    732
    Likes Received:
    204
    One other thing! All these theory's Ask your own Veterans, They are the men that will tell it like it was.
    Sapper
     
  18. redcoat

    redcoat Ace

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    142
    Sorry Sapper but that is exactly what Patton wanted to do, close the gap on the Germans at Falaise, but he was overuled by his commanding officer Bradley, who was worried about the ability of the US troops to keep the gap closed without heavy losses.
    Bradley himself later admitted the failure to close the gap at Falaise was his.
     
  19. Citadel_87

    Citadel_87 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2003
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    [ 16. January 2004, 03:10 PM: Message edited by: Citadel_87 ]
     
  20. Citadel_87

    Citadel_87 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2003
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    [ 16. January 2004, 03:11 PM: Message edited by: Citadel_87 ]
     

Share This Page