To be perfectly honest Rocket, didn't occur to me that. Didn't think someone of Patton's caliber would make such a simple oversight. Got my "hard earned" info from 'Luft '46' website ...
LOL ... It's cool! It was a bit of a "schoolboy" error that Patton. I'll have to dig deep to find a "head scratcher" for you guys ... If I can't find anything by tomorrow I'll throw it open to y'all.
No takers???? Not even a vague "guesstimate" Okay ... A little clue to get you going: Year of manufacture was 1917.
I does look late WW1. My first guess was an Ansaldo SVA 5 but the lower wing of the Ansaldo was level with the lower fuselage. Also the fuselage cross section is too round.
Rocket ... Right period, but wrong plane and wrong country. TiredOldSoldier ... Again, right period. Right country but wrong plane.
Found a list of the planes tested and accepted by DTAM (Direzione Tecnica Aviazione Militare) The only Italian origin single seaters are: SVA 3 (Ansaldo) SVA 5 (Ansaldo) A1 (Ansaldo Balilla) ISVA That would leave only the misterious ISVA I can't find any additional info about unless it's another prototype that failed acceptance testing. BTW I also found a technical report where a test pilot, sent by DTAM to check on field reports of bad manouverability, found the flying schools tought new pilots to turn without banking !!!
Come on now TiredOldBean ... Y'all have an unlimited (or so it would seem) knowledge of airplanes ... (Or internet search tactics). I've tried the rare prototype tactic (worked for Rocket) and the dodgey photo, even the captured planes bearing the wrong insignia ... Someone always gets them right. How about a combo, I thought ... Bad photo, prototype and 'missleading' insignia ... ... So far-e so good-e. A bit too 'good-e', I decided to do a little 'photo-shop' on the original image because it bore the only clue to the planes ID. Three little letters on the tail had to go ... It's time to reveal those letters by showing the photo... A bit of tactical 'searching' should produce the result...
LOL ... No, neither had I mate, but that is exactly what it is ... Good use of 'Google'. Over to you ...