Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Ppsh vs. Thompson

Discussion in 'Weapons & Technology in WWII' started by Gen.Patton, Jun 15, 2005.

  1. Gen.Patton

    Gen.Patton Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    Which one is better? Let's view the traits:

    Ppsh: More ammo, lighter, less accurate

    Thompson: Powerful, less ammo, more accurate, heavier

    I personally like the Thompson better. If I missed any traits, tell me. [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  2. PFC Wilks

    PFC Wilks Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ppsh:higher rate of fire
    Thompson:slower
    Ppsh:cheep
    thompson:not so much
     
  3. PFC Wilks

    PFC Wilks Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    oops. Ppsh. i dont care how powerful a gun is, if you getshot in the hearth, your not shooting back. or much anywhere, sept leg and crap...
     
  4. Gen.Patton

    Gen.Patton Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wich one do you like best. Lets go to the free fire zone, so we can talk about anything.
     
  5. PFC Wilks

    PFC Wilks Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    mky what u call board? the ppsh. it mght not be as strong. i dont care how powerful a gun is, if you getshot in the hearth, your not shooting back. or much anywhere, sept leg and crap...
     
  6. Martin Bull

    Martin Bull Acting Wg. Cdr

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,578
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    London, England.
    Amen to that.
     
  7. FramerT

    FramerT Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,570
    Likes Received:
    38
    Amen to that. </font>[/QUOTE][​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     

Share This Page