Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Royal Army Medical Corps Uniform

Discussion in 'Uniforms, Personal Gear (Kit) and Accessories' started by Cocobelle, Mar 6, 2014.

  1. Cocobelle

    Cocobelle New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2014
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi,

    I have just signed up and already I need a little help. I have bought a Royal Army Medical Corp Uniform which I would like to date. Our small local museum is having a war exhibition in the summer and I want to know if this uniform would be OK to display or if there were great differences between the war uniform and the later version. Anyway here goes -
    It is a dress uniform, dark navy with dark burgundy trimmings. The collar is stand-up with 2 bi-coloured badges which have the Latin inscription. The buttons are quite shiny with the snake inside what looks like a surrounding laurel wreath and a crown on the top. The buttons and buckle are almost a copper colour and very shiny. The label states that it is made by 'Uniform Clothing and Equipment Co' London E.C.1. The label has a picture on the right hand side of a young soldier giving a salute with the letter 'U' in a circle on his chest.

    Essentially I think this may be a post-war uniform but would it have been any different during the war period.

    Many thanks for your help.
     
  2. Drew5233

    Drew5233 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    584
    Likes Received:
    93
  3. Cocobelle

    Cocobelle New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2014
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi,
    I'm not great on the photography scene so it might take a while before I accomplish this task. in the meantime if anyone can tell me if there were significant uniform changes after the war it would be a starting point. Thanks
     
  4. Cocobelle

    Cocobelle New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2014
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi,
    I'm not great on the photography scene so it might take a while before I accomplish this task. in the meantime if anyone can tell me if there were significant uniform changes after the war it would be a starting point. Thanks
     
  5. Cocobelle

    Cocobelle New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2014
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi,

    Could someone move this into the 'uniforms' section. I'm not quite sure exactly where I have put this request !!!! Thanks
     
  6. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,239
    Likes Received:
    3,289
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
  7. Owen

    Owen O

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,782
    Likes Received:
    770
    Has the badge got a King's Crown or a Queen's Crown?
     
  8. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,330
    Likes Received:
    2,622
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Thread moved to a more appropriate area.
     
  9. Cocobelle

    Cocobelle New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2014
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi,

    Yes to the photo provided by 'The Historian '- it looks just like that. Which means I suppose that it is not suitable for WW2 display, sadly. By the way,what is the difference between No 1 and No 2 uniforms ? I see this given places and I have no clue what It means !!!! Thanks for all your help
     
  10. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,239
    Likes Received:
    3,289
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    This might help-
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Army_Uniform
    In WW2, battledress was the only uniform worn for all occasions in Western Europe. Highland regiments often paraded in kilts.
    Regimental headgear was worn with it, or the Field Service (forage) cap, or later in the war, the ridiculous-looking General Service (GS) cap.
    Try and get a hold of this book-
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/British-Army-Uniforms-Insignia-World/dp/185409159X
    it's pretty authoritative.
    And don't waste time trying to put together a display where all the clothing items match; it didn't happen in wartime. Even BD made in the UK differed in shades of Khaki; uniforms made in Canada, NZ and India used finer wool and was more green-looking, that made in the US tended towards darker brown.
    Both patterns of uniform - 1937 and 1941- were issued and can be seen being worn together. Factor in a combination of uniforms from any of the above sources, and regardless to what anyone tells you, lack of uniformity is actually pretty accurate. There was a war on!
     
  11. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,330
    Likes Received:
    2,622
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I was just looking at that site! There are so many uniforms I wasn't sure what the OP was referring to.
     
  12. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,239
    Likes Received:
    3,289
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    He was referring to No1 dress, Lou.
     
  13. VonBond

    VonBond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    37
    For an officer Battledress as already mentioned or service dress could be worn, OR's would only wear the battledress uniform. It does sound like it is the post war dress (no1) jacket/tunic and not used during the WW2.

    An other ranks Battledress blouse would looklike thislate war example of mine.


    View attachment 20544
     

    Attached Files:

  14. warriordoc2

    warriordoc2 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2014
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bridgend, South Wales, UK
    Greeting to all out there! I'm new to this forum and an ex RAMC squaddie. So this will sound odd. Can anyone explain why I have a photograph pre 1950 with a junior nco wearing his lanyard on the left side? Through out my service we always wore our lanyard on the right side. I've checked the photo and theres no tampering and its not a bad negative putting every thing in reverse so please any and all answers will be accepted. Don't worry you should see some of the explainations I had so don't be afraid!!
    I look forward to a long and educating time with you all. Saying that I send you all my very best. Warriordoc2.
     
  15. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,239
    Likes Received:
    3,289
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    Welcome to the forums! Not an expert, so I can only suggest a change in regulations postwar.
     

Share This Page