Email sent to me - ================================================= US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said the United States does not rule out using military force against Iran to prevent it from obtaining nuclear weapons. "All options, including the military one, are on the table," Rumsfeld said in an interview with Monday's edition of German financial newspaper Handelsblatt. "Today, biological, chemical and radiological weapons are available which could kill tens of thousands of people," Rumsfeld said, in comments in German. "There is a genuine possibility that these weapons could fall into the hands of people who behead innocent people and blow up children. "The people of the free world must realize that they have been warned." Rumsfeld said Iran must be prevented from developing a nuclear weapon. "We know that terrorists are desperately seeking ever more deadly weapons. "Iran is the main sponsor of terrorist organisations such as Hezbollah and Hamas," he told Handelsblatt. The Iranian nuclear crisis escalated on Saturday when the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency, voted to report the Islamic republic to the UN Security Council over its atomic programme. Iran said on Monday that large-scale uranium enrichment work, which is the the focus of fears that it is seeking nuclear weapons, would begin in "due course" in response to the IAEA decision. ================================================= Here we go again first the verbal flak then?
are you surprised ? this was watched back in the 90's when we first started up with the wimp Saddam, Syria was also in view as well as little ol Lebannon
the suttleties have started right after WW2 with the Muslims coming in infiltrating Europe since it was now free........that maybe a hard one for our forum members to gulp down but it is true not first coming from my mouth either but the Ww 2 vets living and breathing in europe during the time of make-over and rebuilding. what we have now is not so subtle but an act of everything is hate and waged at them _ Muslims and therefore that a perfect right is entitled to them to act like complete idiots. One day ver soon some are going to say ENOUGH and then the stuff will hit the fan locally and then it will spread.
I see the clown Abu Hamza is in the news again facing another 7 years behind bars according to the BBC. This fool was one of the instigators providing an insurgent protection camp nearly in my backyard here in lovely Oregon ~ Klamath Falls actually. had the locals known that it was an operatrional camp they would of struck with such a vengenance...no prisoner philosophy, and you know what no-one would of cared
Email Update - ================================================= Russian MP Says US To Attack Iran Late March Muslim riots a US psyop aimed at getting EU support for war A top Russian parliamentary leader has told Ekho Moskvy radio station that an attack on Iran is inevitable and that it will occur on March 28th. The leader of the Liberal Democrats Vladimir Zhirinovsky also believes that the Muslim riots were orchestrated by the US to garner European backing for the military strike. Rhetoric has heated significantly in the past week with Donald Rumsfeld yesterday warning that a military option was on the table, echoing the comments of Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist who said that the US was prepared to take military action. Also, Israeli acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert stated that Iran would pay "a very heavy price" if the Islamic Republic defiantly resumes full-scale uranium enrichment to build nuclear weapons. Zhirinovsky told the Russian radio station that, "The war is inevitable because the Americans want this war. Any country claiming a leading position in the world will need to wage wars. Otherwise it will simply not be able to retain its leading position." "The date for the strike is already known — it is the election day in Israel (March 28). It is also known how much that war will cost,” said Zhirinovsky. Commenting on the Muslim riots sweeping the Middle East and Europe, Zhirinovsky (pictured above) said that the publication of the offensive cartoons was a planned psyop on the part of the US and aimed to “provoke a row between Europe and the Islamic world”. “It will all end with European countries thanking the United States and paying, and giving soldiers,” said Zhirinovsky. The possible inorganic manufactured nature of the riots has to be seriously considered. The three most offensive cartoons that caused the outrage were not even printed in the Danish Jyllands-Posten newspaper but were added in and handed out by Danish imams who “circulated the images to brethren in Muslim countries,” according to the London Telegraph. It also appears highly suspicious that Muslims in Gaza City and other places had gained access to a plentiful supply of Danish flags to burn in front of the waiting world media as soon as the controversy broke out. It now comes to light that Merete Eldrup, managing director of JP/Politikens Hus, the company that published the cartoons, is the wife of Anders Eldrup. Anders Eldrup is a Bilderberg member who has attended the last five Bilderberg meetings. The Bilderberg Group is a shadowy organization that meets once a year to steer global policy. It is now widely acknowledged that Bilderberg set the date for the March 2003 invasion of Iraq. The violent demonstrations, on the back of last November's French riots, are clearly having the effect of hardening European sympathy towards Muslims, even as the governments of major European countries open the floodgates to mass immigration. This greases the skids for an accelerated invasion of Iran who yesterday announced they were cutting trade with Denmark over the offensive cartoons. Director of the Russian Political Research Institute Sergei Markov previously warned that Israel was likely to conduct air strikes against Iran in the spring. The window of opportunity seems to be forming for the US and Israel. The White House meeting memo proves that UN consultations and possible sanctions are mere window dressing for a plan of action that has already been decided upon. What remains to be seen is if the US or Israel will attempt to manufacture a staged war provocation to goad the Iranians into signing their own death warrant. The memo, released by QC Philippe Sands, contained details of a discussion between Tony Blair and George Bush where a plan to paint a US spy plane in UN colors and fly it low over Iraq in the hope that Saddam would order it shot down was debated. ================================================= Is this a little odd?
I'd take to your full on gun smith for a tune-up and a full auto load fitted. (sorry had to edit for security reasons) I already have proof through high sources that wmd's left for Syria and were also split up towards Saudia Arabia before we set foot again for the second time in Iraq. We planned this whole second tour and a very peculiar way. If anyone thinks the UN is going to work out verbal sanctions in the name of humanity to the mideastern thugs may I suggest a review of that again ........ we are at war sadly and it will get much worse that a few tweeked individuals promoting riots in the name of allah throughout the European nations [ 07. February 2006, 05:08 PM: Message edited by: Erich ]
If the US decides to go into Iran, it will be with my full support. The only question I have left is? Where the bloody Hell is the US going to get the troops to fight in a country three times the size and population of Iraq?
Fried you have heard of drones have you not ? also who says we are going into Iran with full on infantry might ? what about a certain Allied neighbor to us living amongst these clowns ?
I tracked some info down as this seems to be a hot issue - ================================================= The Times February 07, 2006 Hawks have warplanes ready if the nuclear diplomacy fails By Richard Beeston, Diplomatic Editor ::nobreak::IT IS the option of last resort with consequences too hideous to contemplate. And yet, with diplomacy nearly exhausted, the use of military force to destroy Iran’s nuclear programme is being actively considered by those grappling with one of the world’s most pressing security problems. For five years the West has used every diplomatic device at its disposal to entice Iran into complying with strict conditions that would prevent its nuclear programme being diverted to produce an atomic bomb. Those efforts, however, are now faltering. US leaders are openly discussing the looming conflict. A recent poll showed that 57 per cent of Americans favoured military intervention to stop Iran building a bomb. Tehran scoffs at threats by the West, has pledged to press on with its nuclear progamme and defend itself if attacked. The military option may be the only means of halting a regime that has threatened to annihilate Israel from developing a bomb and triggering a regional nuclear arms race. Experts agree that America has the military capability to destroy Iran’s dozen known atomic sites. US forces virtually surround Iran with military air bases to the west in Afghanistan, to the east in Iraq, Turkey and Qatar and the south in Oman and Diego Garcia. The US Navy also has a carrier group in the Gulf, armed with attack aircraft and Tomahawk cruise missiles. B2 stealth bombers flying from mainland America could also be used. The air campaign would not be easy. The Iranians have been preparing for an attack. Key sites are ringed with air defences and buried underground. Sensitive parts of the Natanz facility are concealed 18 metres (60ft) underground and protected by reinforced concrete two meters thick. Similar protection has been built around the uranium conversion site at Esfahan. “American air strikes on Iran would vastly exceed the scope of the 1981 Israeli attack on the Osiraq centre in Iraq, and would more resemble the opening days of the 2003 air campaign against Iraq,” said the Global Security consultantcy. Lieutenant-Colonel Sam Gardiner, a former US Air Force officer, predicted that knocking out nuclear sites could be over in less than a week. But he gave warning that would only be the beginning. Iran has threatened to defend itself if attacked. It could use medium-range missiles to hit Israel or US military targets in Iraq and the region. It could also use its missiles and submarines to attack shipping in the Gulf, the main export route for much of the world’s energy needs. “Once you have dealt with the nuclear sites you would have to expand the targets,” said Lieutenant-Colonel Gardiner. “There are another 125 to deal with including chemical plants, missile launchers, airfields and submarines.” While this huge US offensive is underway Iran would almost certainly deploy its most powerful weapon. It would unleash a counter-attack through proxies in the region. Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shia militia, would attack Israel. Moqtadr al-Sadr, the militant Iraqi Shia religious leader, could order his Mahdi Army to rise up against American and British forces in Iraq. Iranian-backed groups could wreak havoc against Western targets across the world. What began as a military operation to maintain a balance of power in the Middle East, could instead plunge the region into another conflict. “It will have to be diplomats, not F15s that stop the mullahs,” said Joseph Cirincione, an expert on non-proliferation at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “An air strike against the uranium conversion facility at Esfahan would inflame Muslim anger, rally the Iranian public around an otherwise unpopular government. Finally, the strike would not, as it often said, delay the Iranian programme. It would almost certainly speed it up,” he wrote in an article. PUBLIC OPTIONS ‘All options — including the military one — are on the table’ Donald Rumsfeld, US Defence Secretary ‘There is only one thing worse than military action, that is a nuclear armed Iran’ John McCain, Republican senator for Arizona and US presidential hopeful ‘We are not seeking a military confrontation, but if that happens we will give the enemy a lesson that will be remembered throughout history’ Abdolrahim Moussavi, head of Iran’s joint chiefs of staff ‘Give another year to make HEU (highly-enriched uranium) for a nuclear weapon and a few more months to convert the uranium into weapon components, Iran could have its first nuclear weapon in 2009’ David Albright and Corey Hinderstein, Institute for Science and International Security ‘There isn’t a military option. There certainly isn’t one on the table, let’s be clear about that.’ Jack Straw, Foreign Secretary ‘Obviously we don’t rule out any measures at all’ Tony Blair ================================================= This is not nice at all
Richard, It now turns out that this WAS orchestrated...by Danish Muslim leaders! See 'The Pig Picture' article at the end of this link
http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2006/02/war-against-iran-as-indicated-by-war.html Another point from a former German intelligence officer.
Well Mr. Blair you are indeed as dangerous as they are and I don't trust you. How can you trust a man who is a member of the Bilderberg Group?
The Bilderberg Group, is that anything like the group described thusly in the movie So I Married an Axe Murderer? Maybe Tony Blaire has taken the Colenels place now.
Just asking Mr Bush how much money and how long he can spend on war really before the economy is ruined totally?
Mr Bush needs to get his own house sorted out first, but like all world leaders they don't think about their actions and the repercussions on others, they come out with all sorts of rubbish to justify their actions, but some of the blame rests with us. After all they are voted in to power by us and the sad truth is the mess this planet's in will only get a lot worst. To put it bluntly you have not seen anything yet, you think it's bad now you just stick around and watch.
