Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

NAME OF NEXT BRITISH MAIN BATTLE TANK

Discussion in 'Post-World War 2 Armour' started by Ebar, Dec 14, 2005.

  1. Mutant Poodle

    Mutant Poodle New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,480
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Jupiter's Fourth Moon.
    via TanksinWW2
    lol
     
  2. Oli

    Oli New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scunthorpe, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    The next British tank should be called CLUMSY. If a Chally can trip over a strip of white tape.... :grin:
    [​IMG]

    Oops, should have looked where he was going...
     
  3. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2
    I though it was only red tape that could bring down defence projects?

    :grin:
     
  4. Oli

    Oli New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scunthorpe, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    I wonder if there's cavalry officer reaching for his pistol, ready to put it out of its misery... "I'm sorry old chap, but it's for the best".
     
  5. Ricky

    Ricky New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    :grin:
     
  6. jeaguer

    jeaguer New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    via TanksinWW2
    any thoughts on going in joint venture with the continentals .
    the french and german used to talk about doing one together and sweden
    used to have a funny tank hunter , very flat with a loooong gun .

    the result could be called the concord .
     
  7. Castelot

    Castelot New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,413
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The eldest daugther of Church
    via TanksinWW2
    Or even bether, the Concorde....
     
  8. Ricky

    Ricky New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    And that is why joint projects are best left alone! :grin: :grin:
     
  9. Castelot

    Castelot New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,413
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The eldest daugther of Church
    via TanksinWW2
    I guess so....

    However it must be said that there are quite some sucess stories in such joint projects.
    Concord(e), Jaguar, Airbus, Eurocopter, Ariane just to name a few out of the aerospace industry.

    Arguably, given the rising costs of defence projets, joint projects are the only alternative if Europe is willing to maintain a defence industry of it's own.
     
  10. Ricky

    Ricky New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    True, and there was the Tornado and the Eurofighter.

    In terms of AFVs though, joint projects tend not to work out.

    The MBT-70 is a good example, although the vehicle itself was not practical.

    But there have been a few collaborative projects in Europe where the various countries just pulled out and made their own instead.
     
  11. PMN1

    PMN1 recruit

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    SP70/80/90/whenever springs to mind....
     
  12. jeaguer

    jeaguer New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    via TanksinWW2
    so big a market so many possible trade-off deals, offset deals ,butter
    versus swords deals , all it need is a decent specs and a few imaginative
    politician scoundrels , the thing could actually work. :p :p :p
     
  13. Castelot

    Castelot New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,413
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The eldest daugther of Church
    via TanksinWW2
    On another note, there are rumours that Britain is about to buy Rafale fighters for it's new aircraft carrier.(To enter service after 2012)
    So far Britain wanted to cooperate with the US on the new JSF figther, but apparently the americans are very sensitive about technology transfer....which would go as far as not providing the codes to arm the planes if Britain wanted to use the planes for missions not approved by the Pentagon.
    (This also leads me to the question wether it would not be possible for Britain to develop a naval version of the Eurofigther?)


    And France's new aircraft carrier could be build on a british shipyard....(using joint british-french technology)

    Altough it's hard to imagine british carriers carrying french planes, or the french navy to run a carrier made in Britain....
     
  14. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2

    Interesting. It might be a negotiating gambit point though.

    I know any JSF purchase that the UK makes will be small compared to the US military but your still talking big money. The ability to say 'look we can go elsewhere' would be a useful one. Although how you could limit the actions of conventional weapon with a codes I don't understand.

    If it is possible and we did allow the Americans* that degree of control of an important part of our military, well we might as well close the MOD and accept we don’t have a military of our own.




    *Not intended as an attack on the USA but lets face it your support during the Falklands War was less than whole hearted**.


    ** which was as much because Regan couldn't get his head around why two countries would go to war over a set of islands you could spit across.
     
  15. Castelot

    Castelot New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,413
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The eldest daugther of Church
    via TanksinWW2
    Absolutely.That's certailnly one possibility.



    I don't either.
    It probably has to do with software codes.Remember that software plays an increasing role in modern combat planes.
    Thus the security of that software become very important, and it is primordial to avoid it falling into hostile hands.
    There also may be some fear in the US that others could copy or build spin off products if the JSF software was not protected enough.(After all, it's not only the UK+US that participate in the JSF programm....)
     
  16. jeaguer

    jeaguer New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    via TanksinWW2
    castellot ,you legend, check the BBC news europe

    " The UK and France have formally agreed to share the cost of designing a new aircraft carrier.
    In a memorandum signed by the British and French defence ministers, France agreed to pay the UK up to £100m (146m euros) for design work already done. .
    It will also pay a third of the cost of further development work, if it
    decides to go ahead with construction. "

    but what about a german carrier

    :)
     
  17. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4807710.stm
     
  18. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2
    Came across a magazine article about this topic over the weekend. Apparently the software access is vital if you intend to do any upgrades or modifications to the aircraft. The US has so far offered assurances which are of course worthless. Hopefully the UK government won't suffer one of its regular bouts of spinelessness and will go elsewhere if the US congress continues to be difficult.
     
  19. jeaguer

    jeaguer New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    via TanksinWW2
    .
    .

    OZ is also in the JSF project and apparently the plane will be more costly
    and later than foreseen ,same grief about access to the source codes of the
    weapons integrated system
    .

    the aust. gov. is probably going , very firmly , to make it's traditionnal
    impersonation of a carpet too ! :roll:
    .
    .
     
  20. Oli

    Oli New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scunthorpe, UK
    via TanksinWW2

Share This Page