Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

The Sakhalin question

Discussion in 'WWII Today' started by Kai-Petri, Feb 18, 2009.

  1. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,469
    Likes Received:
    2,208
    Japanese, Russian leaders meet in Sakhalin

    The leaders of Russia and Japan met Wednesday on an island close to their shared border, but made no visible progress on resolving the territorial dispute that has prevented them from signing a treaty formally ending World War II.

    The islands, which Russia calls the southern Kurils and Japan calls the Northern Territories, have been under Russian control since the waning days of World War II. Russia in 2005 suggested that it would cede two of the islands if Japan gave up its claim to the other two, but Japan rejects that idea.

    "The approach when Russia speaks about two islands and we about four absolutely led to no breakthrough," Aso was quoted as saying by the ITAR-Tass news agency after the meeting.

    He said the meeting helped "make an important step toward building strategic relations between the two countries in the Asia-Pacific region" but did not give details, according to the report.
     
  2. Skipper

    Skipper Kommodore

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    24,985
    Likes Received:
    2,386
    Two or even four Islands back ? What about the southern part of the Sakalin Island itself then ? I suspect the Russians will end up giving the four Islands back if Japan gives up claims on the main Island.
     
  3. A-58

    A-58 Cool Dude

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    9,033
    Likes Received:
    1,825
    Location:
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana
    Isn't there sizeable oil reserves on Sakhalin? They won't give that up. And if the Russians do give the Kuriles back to Japan, will they give the lands taken from Finland back as well? There's no need for St. Petersburg to be "out of artillery range" any longer with the long ranged weapons available these days.
     
  4. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    This whole area, Kuriles/Sakhalin has been a burr under the saddle for both nations for a REALLY LONG TIME, since way before Japan was even allowing international trade in Japan and still almost totally isolated from the rest of the world. Personally I would wonder at them ever coming to any kind of agreement over the area.

    They have been worrying this over like two dogs fighting over a bone forever. And with the huge new finds of natural gas on Sakhalin, there is no way the Russians are going to give any of that island away. The Kuriles might be a different matter though. Here is a link to an interesting Timeline, and includes the various treaties that they have signed over the years, and the final one which ended WW2 at the San Francisco peace treaty, which the former Soviet Union didn't sign.

    Time table of Sakhalin
     
  5. A-58

    A-58 Cool Dude

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    9,033
    Likes Received:
    1,825
    Location:
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana
    Yes, they will probably go on about that are for eons, and never solve a thing. You are right about Sakhalin. It will remain Russian too. It will be interesting to see how it plays out. Are there any talks or anything about returning Finnish territory at all?
     

Share This Page