Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

THE SOVIET SUBMARINE FORCE IN WORLD WAR II

Discussion in 'Eastern Europe October 1939 to February 1943' started by JCFalkenbergIII, Mar 24, 2009.

  1. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
    Monday, February 25, 2008

    THE SOVIET SUBMARINE FORCE IN WORLD WAR II


    The early Soviet Navy had to build from a very shattered base, for after the revolution and the bitter civil war that followed, the once powerful Imperial Navy had been reduced to a fraction of its former size. Further, while the proficiency of the Russian Navy had not been great for decades, it was so diminished now that former Tsarist officers were drafted into service as “naval technicians,” and one can only guess what their relations were with the very crews that had not only mutinied, but led the revolution that destroyed their world.

    Yet mutiny was still in the air, and, angry with the terrible food and living conditions, the Baltic Fleet at Kronstadt revolted against their new Bolshevik masters on February 28, 1921. No one knew better than the still tiny Bolshevik party the danger implicit in a naval revolt, and a decision was made to crush it with whatever violence and bloodshed was necessary. The uneven battle lasted for twenty-eight days of bitter fighting. More than 6,000 of the dissidents were killed immediately, and many more were subsequently executed. 32 When the Red troops finally conquered the “counterrevolutionaries,” a decision was made to disestablish the navy as an independent force. It became instead the "Naval Force of the Red Army,” and would not be independent again until December 30, 1937.
    The “counterrevolution” had a profound effect upon the future Soviet Navy, because for many years the principal efforts at reconstructing it were political rather than technical. The Komsomol-the Young Communist League-became the major source for officer personnel to en- sure that a future Red Navy would be politically sound. The Japanese were the last of the foreign countries to pull their troops out of the Soviet Union, leaving in August 1922. From that point on, there were several efforts to rebuild the Soviet Navy, each with emphasis on the importance of the submarine fleet. Things moved slowly, however, and by 1930 there were still only fourteen Soviet submarines in commission.
    In the following years, successive Five Year Plans and, more importantly, Dictator Joseph Stalin's direct interest established a sizeable submarine building program. By 1939, the Soviet Union had the largest submarine fleet in the world, with one hundred fifty submarines in com- mission. Of these, as many as seventy-five percent were smaller, coastal boats, but they were suitable for the defensive purposes intended. Unfortunately for the morale and the training of the force, however, the Soviet Navy had been devastated by the Stalinist purge of officers that had begun on June 11, 1937. Among the first to be executed was Stalin’s finest soldier, Marshal of the Soviet Union Mikhail N. Tukachevsky, along with the naval commissar, T. M. Orlov. Among the many bogus charges levelled at them was their opposition to a powerful Soviet surface fleet. All eight admirals (known, in Soviet parlance, as “flagmen”) of the navy were executed in the purge. On June 22, 1941, when Nazi Germany invaded the Soviet Union, there were 218 submarines in the Red Navy, spread out among the Baltic, Black Sea, Arctic, and Pacific Fleets. The submarines were for the most part modern, but the crews lacked training and the initiative of the commanders was still stunted by the ferocity of Stalin’s purges. While a submarine commander could be executed for any reason, including not doing anything, he was far more likely to be executed for doing something that was unsuccessful or that resulted in damage to his boat.
    The Germans, working in concert with the Finns, executed 103 mine laying operations to bottle up the Baltic Fleet in the Leningrad/Kronstadt area. (Both sides made impressive and effective use of minefields.) German airpower was also very effective in the Baltic, in both offensive operations and anti-submarine warfare. Soviet submarines would occasionally break out of the minefields and elude the German anti-submarine flotillas, but with minimum effect. German naval vessels had escorted some 1,900 merchant ships, of an aggregate 5.6 million tons during 1942, and lost only 20 ships totalling 40,000 tons-less than one percent of the total.
    The Soviet Union regained a presence in the Baltic in the late summer of 1944. The Red Army reached Riga in August, and the Finns surrendered on September 4. Hitler insisted that the remaining German bridgeheads in the Baltic be held as long as possible, but by the end of 1944 it was obvious that some 2,000,000 troops and refugees had to be evacuated.
    The German Navy began a massive evacuation attempt that, despite all the difficulties, was tremendously successful, with ninety-nine percent of those slated for evacuation reaching Germany. Those who did not make it included the victims of the greatest sea disasters in history-disasters that also represented the greatest successes of Soviet submarines.

    On January 30, 1945, the 25,484-ton Wilhelm Gustloff sailed from Pillau, near Danzig, with some 6,100 people on board, including soldiers, sailors, technicians, and civilian refugees. Captain Third RankA. I. Marinesko, commanding the Soviet S-13, fired a spread of four torpedoes, three of which struck the Gustloff. It sank in a little over one hour, taking some 4,000 people with it.
    On February 10, Marinesko would score again, this time against the 14,600-ton General Steuben, carrying 3,000 wounded soldiers and its crew. Of these, only 300 were saved.
    ***​
    Sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff on 30 January 1945 by the Soviet submarine S-13, commanded by Aleksandr Marinesko. A recent account (SOS Wilhelm Gustloff - Die größte Schiffekatastrophe der Geschichte by Heinz Schön) has put the total of passengers far higher than the official figure of 6,050 people on board, with 1,300 rescued. According to Schön, a survivor and dedicated chronicler of the disaster, there were 10,582 people on the ship, of whom 8,956 were refugees, and the toll reached 9,343 dead. Clearly the official figure is too low, but Schön’s figures seem extremely high. Günther Grass, in his novel Im Krebsgang based on the sinking of the ship, appears to put the true figure closer to 9,000 passengers. In any case, the extra passengers mean that this was the greatest disaster in marine history, just ahead of the sinking of the hospital ship Goya in the same area on 16 April when only 165 were saved out of a total of over 7,000 refugees. (p.181).

    Irwin J. Kappes References states 5,348. He does not cite his sources but recommends: A. V. Sellwood, The Damned Don't Drown: The Sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff ; and Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans 1944-1950.
    Jason Pipes, References citing Heinz Schon References (no page number) claims the loss of life was 9,343
    The Goya, also torpedoed in 1945, also sank with the loss of over 6,000 passengers and crew.
    ***​

    Both ships were legitimate targets, and Marinesko was awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union. But the very fact that these two sinkings were the most noteworthy of all the Soviet submarine activity in the Baltic during World War II is an indication of the relative ineffectiveness of their very large submarine fleet.
    Soviet submarines in other areas did not have any more success. The submarines of the Northern Fleet were perhaps the most helpful of all, since they supported the defense of the land areas around Murmansk. The Black Sea Fleet was rendered ineffective early on by German air- power and the swift advance of enemy ground forces. The Pacific Fleet made its greatest contribution by sending some of its submarines all the way around the world to reinforce the Northern Fleet. (One of these was lost off the northwest coast of the United States, sunk by the I-25, a Japanese submarine. Besides sinking some merchant shipping, the I-25 conducted the only bombing raids on U.S. soil, launching a Yokosuka E14Yin two attacks on the wooded Oregon coast, where it dropped a total of four 76-kg incendiary bombs.
    Thus the Great Patriotic War, as the Soviet Union, with justifiable pride, termed the Second World War, ended for the Soviet Navy on an unimpressive note. While the Red Army had distinguished itself in the most titanic battles in history, and the Red Air Force had provided close air support for the Army, the Navy had not distinguished itself. The surface navy (even where numerically superior, as it was in the Baltic) had not engaged the enemy in any fleet actions, and the level of effort of the submarines was, as noted, unremarkable. The Red Navy had done well in coastal defense efforts, in riverine warfare, and in amphibious landings. Rear Admiral Gorshkov, a future four star admiral, architect of the Cold War Soviet Navy, and its commander in chief, had distinguished himself in all three of these efforts, and had also proved himself to be politically adept.

    Enter Gorshkov


    Born in 1910, Sergei Gorshkov emerged from the Frunze Higher Naval School in 1931. He spent much of his early career in the Black Sea and Pacific Fleets accumulating experience in navigation and ship operations, mostly in destroyers. By 1939 Stalin’s purges had taken their toll on the naval officer corps and the potential German threat created fast-track opportunities for junior officers. In that year Gorshkov returned to the Black Sea Fleet and successfully completed the senior officer’s course at the Viroshilov Naval Academy. He had command of a cruiser squadron in the Black Sea when the Germans invaded the Soviet Union in 1941. Active in combined operations designed to protect Odessa early in the war; Gorshkov became a rear admiral and received command of the Azov Flotilla in October of 1941, only ten years after receiving his commission in the Soviet Navy. As the Germans penetrated his homeland he played a pivotal role in the amphibious landings at Kerch in December 1941, designed to relieve Sevastopol, and as the deputy naval commander in operations designed to protect Novorossisk, the latter bringing him to the attention of the future minister of defence General A. A. Grechko. Gorshkov ended the war directing the naval operations of the Danube Flotilla in support of the Army’s effort against the Germans in the Ukraine and in the Balkans. By 1951, now
    Vice Admiral Gorshkov became commander in chief of the Black Sea Fleet. He took up residence in Moscow in 1955 as first deputy commander in chief of the Soviet Navy under Admiral N. G. Kuznetsov, and with the assistance of a rising political star, Nikita “Khrushchev, he re- placed Kuznetsov as commander in chief in 1956. He held that post un- til his retirement in 1985.

    The Soviet Navy Gorshkov knew was in a very difficult way in 1945, despite a profession by Joseph Stalin that the Soviet people “wanted to see their Navy still stronger and more powerful.” Stalin envisioned Hitler’s dream-a titanic struggle between the Soviet Union against the Western powers-as taking place by 1960 at the latest, and he planned to have the most powerful army, air force, and navy in the world, able to take on Great Britain and the United States in combination.

    One of the great ironies of Stalin’s vision was the fact that as he flogged Soviet industry mercilessly to rearm at the expense of civilian consumption, his putative enemies were disarming at a frantic rate and jump-starting their consumer industries to provide basic items that
    were always luxuries in the Soviet Union, and luxury items that would never be available. It was the ultimate triumph of Rockefeller and Ford over Marx and Lenin that the build-up of consumer industries continually strengthened the economies of the Western powers, while the efforts of Stalin and his successors in establishing a huge military economy ultimately brought about the demise of the Soviet Union.

    The decade that followed saw the Soviet Union in Stalin’s iron grip for eight years, during which he followed through by establishing a ship-building program of colossal proportions. Had it been fulfilled to the letter, the Soviet Navy would have possessed four aircraft carriers, ten battle cruisers, twenty-four cruisers, and an incredible 1,244 submarines, along with all of the other ship classes pertinent to a first -class navy.

    The time had passed for such a formidable navy, but no one was going to inform Stalin of that fact. Ironically, the paranoia that drove him to the many purges of leadership caused political shake-ups that damaged the operation of the Soviet Navy. He abolished the Navy Commissariat, and placed the navy under the People's Commissariat of Defense, later designated the Ministry of the Armed Forces in March 1946. Then, he turned on Admiral Kuznetsov, as he had earlier turned on Marshal Tukachevsky, Marshal Georgi Zhukov, the aircraft designer Andrei Tupolev, and many others. Kuznetsov was court-martialled and dismissed as commander in chief of the navy on the customary charge of treason. In February 1950, he was recalled as Commander in Chief of the Pacific Fleet Navy. The new commander in chief of the navy as a whole was Admiral I. S. Yumashev, but his tenure would be short, for Kuznetsov would once more resume that role in 1951.

    War and Game: THE SOVIET SUBMARINE FORCE IN WORLD WAR II
     
  2. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    23
    There's a chapter on the Soviet submarine effort in here:
    Sadkovich, James J. (ed.) Reevaluating Major Naval Combatants of World War II. Greenwood Press Inc., 1990.
    You can also keep an eye out for On Seas Contested, which may be published this year.
    The Soviets had a large submarine force, but much of this nominal strength consisted of the M class, which was little more than a midget sub. The first couple series of M's were effectively useless, but the last batch or two progressed to semi-useful. The other classes were all relatively crude. The best was the S class, designed by the Germans but nevertheless subject to the materiel and workmanship problems in Soviet manufacturing.
    The personnel problems are fairly obvious. Semi-trained, poorly administered, subject to all the joys of Soviet high command....
    Circumstances made matters worse. The rapid loss of bases pushed submarines farther from the most promising hunting grounds. In the Baltic, where prospects for success were greatest against an enemy who knew little of ASW, the Soviets stood around and watched as the Gulf of Finland was enclosed in a massive, intricate minefield--arguably the most effective anti-submarine effort in history.
     
  3. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426

Share This Page