Prolieator, You stated in your post #209 that the Panther turret traversed 360 degrees in 15 seconds at 2000 RPM but clearly Jentz, in his...
What Zalooga says is based on US battle reports conducted after the battle with plenty of time to figure everything out along with German reports....
I don't want what is right here in the thread,I want the actual technical manual you keep citing . I mean if it says what you say it says you...
In Jentz's "Germany's Panther Tank: The Quest For Combat Supremacy" on page 57 he talks about going from Panther D's single speed traverse...
Diagrams here from the technical manual but still nothing written so where is the technical manual? That's been my question.... where online can...
Again I found something called a 'technical manual" but it didn't have the inserted red highlighting/writing . Where can I find an actual...
All I could find was this. I did find a link to the "technical manual" you cited but it didn't have the red hightlights yours shows....
Prolieator, Could you please tell me what page in the manual that you found the reference to Nr2 as per turret traverse speed? and where all...
Just where does it show in those links the piece being used in action?
Yes I did in my post from 10:59 PM on 6/12/2010.
COMMENT: then which books? what pages? I listed my sources and pages why can't you?
Yes and it still took much longer then a Sherman to traverse taking 16 seconds in one video to get 1/3 of the way around & in the other video 20...
Von poop, Removed email address. Sorry mate but it is not a good idea to post your email address on the open forum, it would be better to...
Just watched those videos you use as "proof' ,in the 2nd video it shows the turret on a parade ground,totally level starting to traverse at the...
Also read pages 25-28 of Stephen Zalooga's "Panther versus the Sherman" on the fire control especially the part about firing whilst on offensive...
TAG, It seems Mr. Proliator is fond of Thomas Jentz,in the latter's book on the Panther states that it's turret traversed in 60 seconds...
sources please?
Fine I understand your point but what I was implying was that getting rid of unions isn't the end all to be all . As far as your last sentence...
Sorry I worded it wrong what I meant was that getting rid of unions isn't neccessarily going to keep buisnesses/jobs here. Alot of non-union...
Please,please don't make me laugh at your comment about getting rid of unions so products can be made cheaper then companies of the US can hire...
