Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

A Drinking Game for BO's Speech Tonight (9/9/09)

Discussion in 'The Stump' started by texson66, Sep 9, 2009.

  1. C.Evans

    C.Evans Expert

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2000
    Messages:
    25,883
    Likes Received:
    857
    Urgh, for your last reply, your still off base. No im not saying that those listed have never served or anything in that nature but, as for the liberal part-you know EXACTLY who the two individuals are that I am talking about and that im not talking about all of them who are members on this site. In fact, I have loads of respect for those who served-whether or not they agree with me-but don't you say that I sat back and did nothing when you dont even know me. Though it was not Military, it was still in Law Enforcement-and no-I am NOT talking about the time when I was a State Correctional Officer. Because I have respect for you, I will not go further on this-as I could very easily do.
     
  2. urqh

    urqh Tea drinking surrender monkey

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,683
    Likes Received:
    955
    Carl ive posted the bases for deystroyers treaty. Ignore it if you so wish.
     
  3. C.Evans

    C.Evans Expert

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2000
    Messages:
    25,883
    Likes Received:
    857
    I wish.
     
  4. urqh

    urqh Tea drinking surrender monkey

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,683
    Likes Received:
    955
    Ok. Its only the facts. No heresay no stories just the actual document. Others can read it. Its not about to go away. Its history. Not revisionism.
     
  5. C.Evans

    C.Evans Expert

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2000
    Messages:
    25,883
    Likes Received:
    857
    Well, its not what I read in older books and such so??? Anyway, this isn't getting us anywhere.

    Cheers--C.

    PS, I do thank you for your efforts.
     
  6. urqh

    urqh Tea drinking surrender monkey

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,683
    Likes Received:
    955
    Actually it has got us there the treaty is from your own governmemt records. It disproves your bases for destroyers argument. And your implication that i was a revisionist. It wasnt personal carl. Well not on my part even with your implications.
     
  7. luketdrifter

    luketdrifter Ace

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    2,349
    Likes Received:
    304
    One more P.F.F.
     
  8. urqh

    urqh Tea drinking surrender monkey

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,683
    Likes Received:
    955
  9. Stefan

    Stefan Cavalry Rupert

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2001
    Messages:
    5,368
    Likes Received:
    336
    Oh, so you choose to ignore facts when put in front of you because they clearly conflict with your preconceptions, that makes sense. That's a great attitude for a student of history! As for the cool aid keep it, it tastes horrible.
     
  10. C.Evans

    C.Evans Expert

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2000
    Messages:
    25,883
    Likes Received:
    857
    No stefan, I choose to ignore your beating-around-the-bush-games and as I have better things to do than to play along with y=that silliness-I will not give a credible reply. This one is also the last one for me with you in this thread.

    Cheerio.
     
  11. Stefan

    Stefan Cavalry Rupert

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2001
    Messages:
    5,368
    Likes Received:
    336
    Fair enough carl, but there have been no games, simply statements of fact. To paraphrase the saying if you can't stand the heat so probably best to stay out of the kitchen.
     

Share This Page